
Palestinian Christians: Are They Faithful Witnesses?
Western Christians must carefully consider Palestinian Christian claims about Israel, the legacy of dhimmitude, and how fear and persecution may shape today’s political narratives.
In July 2026, the Church of England General Synod voted to “hear” Kairos Palestine II (A Moment of Truth: Faith in a Time of Genocide), as a “heartfelt expression of Palestinian Christians’ lived experience”.
Issued by Palestinian Christian leaders, and claiming to be the voice of the Palestinian community (“the collective word of Palestinian Christians” according to the original 2009 Kairos document), the document describes Israel’s Gaza campaign as “genocide”, and calls Israel a colonial/settler/apartheid entity built on racism and “Jewish supremacy”.
Kairos II also contains a call to “isolate Israel, hold it accountable, impose sanctions, boycott it, and ban the export of arms.” Palestinian Christians must surely know what they are calling for.
They know that support for Hamas tripled in the West Bank in the direct aftermath of October 7, when its mass killings, sexual violence and hostage taking, as seen on Al Jazeera, were all that they knew about it, and support for what happened on October 7 was between 60 and 80% of the population.
Yet, after seeing what happened on October 7 (when Israeli communities were not properly defended), they still issued a call to make all Israel less well defended, to “isolate Israel, hold it accountable, impose sanctions, boycott it, and ban the export of arms.” Palestinian Christians must know what would happen if their call were to be effective. Massacre and atrocity on an unimaginable scale against their Jewish/Israeli neighbours. Yet Kairos II still calls for it.
So, why do it???
And, how should Western Christians relate to this document?
These questions make this article, originally written in August 2021, of even greater relevance now.
Palestinian Christians: Are They Faithful Witnesses?
A recent article by Dexter Van Zile began:
“[In July], the United Church of Christ (UCC)’s General Synod passed a ‘peacemaking’ resolution that declared Israel guilty of sins against the Palestinian people. The resolution repeats the narrative offered about the evils of the Jewish state broadcast by Palestinian Christians in the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem, who have been demonising Israel for decades.”[1]
This Western church, like numerous others, was attacking Israel on the basis of information provided by Palestinian Christians. This raises the important question: “How should we view Palestinian Christian statements about their situation in Israel/Palestine?”
Given that Western churches are acting upon this advice, this is an important question for them to consider. The discussion begins with the concept of dhimmitude, and its impact upon the spiritual lives of the Palestinian Christians.
Dhimmitude was the contract entered into between the Muslim conquerors and the conquered Christian and Jewish populations. Basically, it treated them as rubbish in exchange for not murdering them. They had to promise not to speak badly about Islam, not to preach the Gospel, and to accept endless humiliations and contempt from the ruling Muslims. See The Pact of Umar (Shurut Umar) and later jurists (al-Shafi‘i, al-Mawardi, and others).
The Christian communities have been suffering under this system for 1300 years(!), and its effects are profound.
“Dhimmis can appear to collude to conceal their own condition, finding themselves psychologically unable to critique or oppose it. The psychology of gratitude and inferiority can manifest in the dhimmi as denial or concealment of the condition.
… the psychology of inferiority can mean that people from a dhimmi background are themselves the least able to analyse or expose their own condition. A powerful silence rests over the whole subject like a thick blanket or a strong dose of anaesthetic.”[2]
“Christian communities native to the Middle East today exhibit the scars of centuries of inferiorization and marginalization. They constitute living relics of the ravages of a system that, although technically abolished in many modern Arab states, continues on the level of official as well as popular attitudes and practices. The Christians of the Holy Land, for example ‘Palestinian Christians’, are symptomatic of this dhimmi genre and its attendant complexes.”[3]
Sadly, the Palestinian Christian communities, their leadership, and many of their members, witness to this internalised oppression all too frequently. They may well rationalise it by believing that by agreeing with the Muslims, they are protecting their communities from even greater harm, but their calling is to preach the truth, not to fear men. Life truly has not been easy for them! We should pray for them!
Examples of life under Muslim rule from Palestinian Christian history
In 1785, Constantin de Volney wrote:
“Faithful to the spirit of the Koran, it [the government] treats the Christians with a severity which displays itself in varied forms. … All kinds of public worship is prohibited the Christians, … They cannot build any new churches; and if the old ones fall into decay, they are not allowed to repair them, unless by a permission which costs them very dear. A Christian cannot strike a Mahometan without risk of his life, but if a Mahometan kill a Christian, he escapes for a stipulated price.”[4]
As the Mufti of Jerusalem said in a fatwa issued in 1853, “It is against the honour of the Moslem religion to permit Christian Churches to be erected.”[5] In 1823, some Christian villagers refused to pay “the excessive and arbitrary” taxation laid upon them (but not the Muslims).
The soldiers then “caught hold of an infirm old peasant of the Christian village of Beit Jalla, shot him, cut off his head, and stuck it up inside the Jaffa gate of Jerusalem, where it was pelted and spit upon by boys of the street for three days. Christians passing by were melted into tears, but dared not give expression to their feelings.”[6]
The early Anglican priest, Michael Kawar, mentioned in his autobiography that anti-Christian riots in Nazareth had forced his father to flee to Lebanon in the 1820s.[7] In 1828, in Nazareth, a Christian girl who refused the advances of a Muslim man was killed by being dragged through the streets behind a horse. This would have served as a reminder to all other Christian girls not to resist a Muslim.
Indeed, prior to 1845, James Finn wrote that Christian women were “dishonoured with impunity.” As Colonel P. Campbell, A Visit to Israel’s Holy Places (1839) wrote: “The Mussulmans [of Syria-Palestine], … from the bottom of his heart he believes and maintains that a Christian, and still more so a Jew, is an inferior being to himself.”[8]
Ottoman reforms granting civil rights to Christians and Jews in the nineteenth century upset this centuries-old pattern, and provoked a savage backlash from the Muslim community. The American Protestant missionary, Henry H. Jessup, wrote that, “the new liberties granted to the Christian sects, … had kindled [among the Muslims] fires of fanatical hatred.”[9]
In 1853 in Nablus, the sight of a Syrian Christian official sitting in a chair roused a Muslim mob to shout: “Kill him, kill him. Did you ever see a Christian like that before?”
In 1856, Muslim riots in Nablus left a number of Christians dead and forced the expulsion of the entire Protestant community. The Nablus Protestants wrote to the Sultan. They spoke of “their afflicted and calamitous state … the injuries inflicted on them, the loss of their freedom, the insecurities of their lives, property and families, all of which they presently endure (and for the previous 5 months). Since the issue of the Firman (February 1856) declaring religious liberty, the Mohammedans of Nablus have been filled with rage against the Christians.”
On Friday, April 4th, most of the Ulamahs of Nablus assembled in one of the Mosques … after this, the call was given by one of them going through the streets; “Oh religion of Mohammad, attack the Christians.” At the same time, all the Mohammedans being assembled for prayer, the Ulamahs stopped the Muazzins and made them come down from the Minarets, saying there shall be no prayers for the religion of Muhammad is dead.”
They aroused the populace “to fury, that they might fall upon the Christians.” They destroyed the school of Bishop Gobat, and the attached chapel. They also killed a number of Christians, burying one boy in lime.
The shouts of the mob were “frightful, together with those of the females who shrieked on the terraces to excite and encourage them.” The Greek Orthodox, “from fear, have appeared outwardly satisfied with the Mohammedans, and have made no claim [of] satisfaction for the injuries done.”[10]
That is, the local Christians, from fear, did not even attempt to gain compensation through the court, but simply accepted the murder, violence, robbery and destruction of property they had been subjected to. Such was their life under Muslim rule. Note also the cry from the crowds that if they are unable to persecute Christians, then Islam is dead.
The Rev. Arthur George Harper Hollingsworth wrote in 1852, “No Christian is secure against insult, robbery, and ruin.”[11] In 1858, the two villages of Zebabdeh and Likfair (where the inhabitants were all Christian) “were utterly sacked, men and women stripped even to their shirts and turned adrift.”
“Whereas many villages in the district of Nablus have a few Christian families located in each, such families were subjected in every direction to plunder and insults.”
Also in 1858, James Finn wrote from Jerusalem, “Daily accounts are given me of insults in the streets offered to Christians and Jews, accompanied by acts of violence. … There is no clear case yet known of a Christian’s evidence being accepted in a court of justice, or in a civil tribunal against a Moslem.”[12]
In 1876, J.P. Newman wrote that in nearly all parts of Palestine, “the Christians are cringing and fearful.”[13] Christians were forbidden from entering or praying at the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, or Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron.
One reads of “the talk” that black parents give their children in America, and Jewish parents give their children worldwide. Christian parents in Muslim lands also rightly pass down their fears and nightmares. Najib Awad describes how beneath the rich history of plurality for eastern Christians, there hides a “parallel history of suffering, uncertainty, fear, pressure, difficulty, death and perpetual strife for survival as a minority in a non-Christian majority world.”[14]
Christian strategies supporting (secular) Arab nationalism and anti-Zionism cannot be fully understood apart from this overwhelming fear, a fear which, for obvious reasons, is rarely mentioned in public.
In 1923, Dr Alexander Paterson reflected in general upon the inter-communal relations:
“It was this age-long incompatibility, this irreconcilable enmity, that was more potent for evil than any other single factor, and harder to be dealt with than any other obstacle to mission work. The Moslem and Christian hated the Jew for denying and slaying the Messiah, the Christ. The Moslem and Jew hated the Christian for worshipping three gods.
The Jew and the Christian hated the Moslem for his arrogance and fanaticism and oppression, from which they never felt safe. Of course, they commonly existed in an armed truce; life otherwise were impossible. But an anniversary or an indiscreet word, an un-equal deal in business, or a false report, and their passions were in full cry, too often the cry for blood.”[15]
The sentence from the above quote is important: “Of course, they commonly existed in an armed truce; life otherwise were impossible.” Concerning the Jewish community during Ottoman times, Yaari writes, “subjected throughout to severe disabilities, restrictions and humiliations, they were as a rule not seriously molested.”[16]
Conditions did vary, both from place to place and over time. There were positive relations between members of the different communities, but everyone still understood the rules and knew the boundaries. Decent Muslims hid Jews during the 1929 Hebron massacre, but still, the Muslim mob murdered 67-9 Jews.
Likewise, during the 1834 pillaging of the Safed Jewish community, it is reported that Rabbi Menachem Mendel fled to the house of a Christian to escape the mob.[17] These positive, welcome exceptions do not nullify the more general situations described above. Obviously, community norms do not define every single member of that community.
Ongoing Effects
According to the Islamic scholar, Ibn ‘Ajibah, the purpose of dhimmitude was a killing of the soul: [The dhimmi] “is commanded to put his soul, good fortune and desires to death. Above all, he should kill the love of life, leadership and honour. [The dhimmi] is to invert the longings of his soul, he is to load it down more heavily than it can bear until it is completely submissive.”[18]
Dhimmitude entails a spiritual as well as a social enslavement. Being subservient, keeping quiet, submitting to countless minor humiliations, not resisting even when beaten, or community members are raped — all of this has profound effects upon the self-image of those subjected to it. They come to believe that they are indeed inferior, that Muslims are indeed superior.
The dhimmi was, in fact, made to feel gratitude towards the Muslims for not killing him. There are obvious similarities between this and the appalling ‘battered wife syndrome.’[19] Dhimmis lose all self-respect and come to believe they deserve their fate. As seen, they also will not speak out against Islam.
All of these characteristics can be seen in the Palestinian Christian leadership today. Being generally better educated, and at the same time, desperate to ingratiate themselves, Palestinian Christians have indeed often taken the lead in defending Islam to the West.
Western Christians all too often view such Christians as co-religionists, as an unbiased but knowledgeable reference for all things Muslim, especially on the treatment by Muslims of non-Muslims. They also trust their views on the Arab Israeli conflict for the same reasons.
And the Palestinian Christians continually tell their Christian brothers and sisters in the West how well they and the Muslims get on, how happy they always were together, and how Islam is a religion of peace.
“In the Palestinian historiography today, the discrimination in past and present of the Christian Palestinians and the periodical tensions among the Muslims and Christians are regarded as taboo.”[20]
Bat Ye’or notes how Syrian Christians have “dedicated themselves to extolling at both a political and a literary level the greatness and tolerance of Islamic civilization.”[21] This is also seen in Palestinian Christian Edward Said’s book Orientalism.[22]
Muslim/Christian relations have “all too often been mythologised by intellectuals and clergymen who never tire of insisting that harmony has always prevailed between Muslims and Christians in Palestine.
The Anglican Bishop of the Diocese of Jerusalem Riyah Abu-‘Assal stated emphatically to this author: ‘The entire history of Palestine never witnessed any religious conflict between Christians and Muslims.’”[23]
Likewise in 2011, Father Manuel Musallam, head of Gaza’s Catholics, met with Hamas leader, Mahmoud al Zahar, and declared that “Christians are not threatened by Muslims.”[24]
Presumably wanting to protect their own community from real dangers, they seem incapable of warning their Christian brothers and sisters of the horrors they have experienced. What we get are essentially hostage videos. Do we really expect the Christian community, about 1% of the Palestinian population, to risk offending the dominant community at a time when Christian communities across the Middle East have been decimated? We should have the wisdom to recognise what lies behind their words.
As Mark Durie in his excellent book “Liberty to the Captives: Freedom from Islam and Dhimmitude through the Cross” shows, they need to repent of being dhimmis, break the power of Islam over them and step out into the freedom and truth of Jesus.
Contemptible Behaviour and False Hopes
Palestinian Christian leaders also know that Palestinian Christians receive better treatment from Israel than any other minority in the Middle East, and that the only Christian community in the Middle East which is thriving is in Israel.
They also know that Israel, the Jewish state, treats Christians and Muslims far better than Christians and Muslims ever treated Jews when they were in the minority. Yet no words of gratitude are heard. Instead, groups like Kairos spend all their time and energy, not preaching the Gospel, but attacking Israel.
Palestinian Christians need to wake up! A democratic, secular state is not going to happen. Sure, they have wanted this since the 1830s and the Ottoman Tanzimat reforms, because it gives them, as a tiny minority, advantages/protections from the reality of dhimmitude.
But it offers no advantage to the Muslim majority; rather, it conflicts with a fundamental aspect of Islam. We have already seen the rage these reforms produced locally in Palestine in 1856. The best the Palestinian Christians might hope for is to be in a situation similar to that in Jordan.
Interestingly, between 1947 and 1967, Palestinian Christians gained some experience of living under Jordanian rule. During that time, the Christian population of Jerusalem dropped from over forty-five thousand to twenty-eight thousand. (It had more than doubled during the British Mandate.) Christian institutions were barred from purchasing or even renting land in the Old City of Jerusalem. This was due to increasing Muslim demands.
Local Christians were again made to feel inferior, and dependent upon the diminishing goodwill of the Muslim majority. Christianity was attacked in Friday sermons, on radio and also physically, especially during times of crisis such as 1956 and 1966-7.
In 1966, the violence was so bad that the Latin and Greek Catholic bishops in Amman issued a rare public protest against the “official policy of discrimination and assaults on Christians.”[25]
Between official government restrictions and popular antipathy, Palestinian Christians during the Jordanian period again experienced the reality of living as a despised minority within a Muslim majority population. And all that was while they were under the protection of King Hussain, who was a moderate, pro-western due to his education, wife and allies, and generally viewed as a buffer to the increasingly anti-Christian legislation and acts of the government and population. There would be no King Hussain in any future Palestinian state.
In fact, within Palestine, the Christians have known since the 1920s that there will be no secular state, and they have been left always backing the least Islamic of the various Muslim contenders. Having spent the past 40 years backing the PA, many are now turning in despair to Hamas,[26] and hoping that they can ingratiate themselves sufficiently to survive.
More Recent Palestinian Christian History – Still Being Treated as Dhimmis
The photo below was taken in 2015, at the entrance to the Church of the Annunciation in Nazareth.
In 2005, a Christian village, Taiba, was “ransacked” by more than 500 Muslim men chanting “Allahu akbar” because a Christian man from that village had a romantic relationship with a Muslim woman.[27]
Also in 2005, Justus Reid Weiner investigated the human rights of Palestinian Christians living under the Palestinian Authority. He reported that “there is a widespread distrust of religious leaders among Palestinian Christians, who ‘obfuscate the situation as it affects their constituents.’
One Christian man said, ‘Our leaders are liars: They tell the newspapers that everything is OK. But when Christians go to the market, they’re afraid to wear crosses.’”[28]
In 2019, on April 25, “the terrified residents of the Christian village of Jifna near Ramallah asked the PA to protect them after they were attacked by dozens of Muslim gunmen. The violence erupted after a woman from the village submitted a complaint to the police that the son of a prominent, Fatah-affiliated leader had attacked her family.”
The attackers “fired hundreds of bullets in the air, threw petrol bombs while shouting curses, and caused severe damage to public property.” They also called on the residents to pay jizya.
Despite the residents’ cries for help, the PA police did not intervene. According to the BESA Centre, Fatah regularly exerts heavy pressure on Christians not to report the acts of violence and vandalism from which they frequently suffer.[29]
The Wider Impact of Dhimmitude
“… and sin, when it is full-grown, gives birth to death.” (James 1:15)
Having (in their eyes) been humiliated by the Jews for over 100 years, if Hamas/Hezbollah/PA/whatever succeeded in taking back control of Jerusalem, would they want this to be seen as a triumph of Western democratic secular values, or as a triumph of Islam?
Palestinian Christians need to think about this: they know the answer! Wake up, there is not going to be a secular, democratic state of Palestine.
“The fact is that if the Islamists ever fulfilled their dream of defeating the Israelis and hurling the Jews into the sea, they would hardly be predisposed to share power with Palestinian Christians, secular or otherwise. … the mirage of Palestinian nationalism will not save the Christians from the oppression that awaits them at the hands of the radical Islamists who are increasingly calling the shots in Palestinian society.”[30]
How Christians deal with their own persecution is up to them. In light of the second Commandment, the real question Palestinian Christian leaders need to ask themselves (given that some are working tirelessly to harm Israel) is, “If Israel were to be overpowered, what would happen to the defeated Jewish population?”
Again, they need to think about this, because deep down, hidden under layers of servile dhimmitude, they know the answer. Massacre. The Muslim Palestinians make no secret about it! Sermons about trees telling Muslims to kill Jews behind them, “the army of Khaybar”, etc! You know this!
They reward with large sums of money any Palestinian who murders Israeli civilians, including 3-month-old children. Statues are put up of, streets and soccer clubs are named after Palestinians who murder Israelis. Listen to Hamas sermons about killing Jews worldwide. They are not trying to hide this.
So Palestinian Christians, think clearly. Palestinian Christian organisations like Kairos want to weaken Western Protestant evangelical support for Israel. This is largely to show the Muslim majority that they have value, so they will not suffer the same fate as the other Christian communities across the Middle East. Shamefully, this is not just their dhimmitude in action. As well as that, some Palestinian denominations, like Christian denominations worldwide, have yet to acknowledge and repent of their own anti-Semitism.
The question you need to ask is, “Am I working and doing all of this year in and year out? Is what I am doing enabling and empowering genocide?”
Remember, one day, each one of you will have to answer to the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. You do not want to face him with that on your resume! I do not think it will happen, but that is the goal you are working to further.
The other option, taught by your Anglican founders, proclaimed God’s faithfulness to the Jewish people. When (according to their own worldview) the Muslims were defeated by the Jews in 1948, and again in 1967, they knew something spiritual had happened. They interpret reality in spiritual terms.
Had you spent the previous 100 years proclaiming God’s faithfulness to the Jewish people as part of the Gospel, they would not have liked you (they don’t anyway), but they would have been given the means to understand what was happening. Had you warned them, “do not oppose this return, for God is in it and you will not succeed”, the path of the Lord would have been straightened. Many might have repented. But they never heard it explained to them by you.
So rather than attacking God’s grace in rescuing and restoring the Jewish people to the land He promised to them, Palestinian Christian leaders and their Western allies need to repent, break the chains of dhimmitude, ask forgiveness from the Jewish people, and bear fruits of repentance.
And Christians in the West should be aware of all this when they evaluate their anti-Israeli pronouncements.
___
[1] Dexter Van Zile, “Time to Put the United Church of Christ on Trial for Antisemitism“, Camera, 9 August 2021.
[2] M. Durie, The Third Choice, 181.
[3] Habib C. Malik, “Christians in the Land Called Holy“, First Things, 1 January 1999.
[4] Bat Ye’or, 1985; The Dhimmi, 214-17.
[5] Bat Ye’or, 1985; 244-5.
[6] Bat Ye’or, 1985; 235-6.
[7] Farah, In Troubled Waters, 11.
[8] Bat Ye’or, 1985; 224.
[9] Freas, Muslim-Christian Relations in Palestine During the British Mandate Period, 39.
[10] Bat Ye’or, 1985; 246-8.
[11] Hollingsworth, Remarks on the present condition and future prospects of the Jews in Palestine, 1852, 4.
[12] Raphael Israeli, Green Crescent over Nazareth, 11. (See also Bat Ye’or, 1985; 252.) Taken from the official dispatches of James Finn.
[13] Emmett, Beyond the Basilica: Christians and Muslims in Nazareth 29.
[14] Ashdown, Christian–Muslim Relations in Syria, 11.
[15] A Galilee doctor being a sketch of the career of Dr D. W. Torrance of Tiberias by W. P. Livingstone.
[16] Avraham Yaari, The Goodly Heritage, 11.
[17] A. Yaari, 40.
[18] M. Durie, 140.
[19] See M. Duries, 283 for a discussion on this.
[20] Kimmerling, Processes. Quoted in Frantzman, 23.
[21] M. Durie, 201.
[22] See M. Durie, 201-2.
[23] Habib C. Malik, “Christians in the Land Called Holy“, First Things, 1 January 1999. Written by a Lebanese Christian, this whole article is well worth reading.
[24] Giulio Meotti, “Vatican’s twisted priorities: instead of focusing on decline of Arab Christianity, Catholic Church chooses to demonize Israel“, Ynet Global, 16 March 2012.
[25] Tsimhoni, Christian Communities in Jerusalem and the West Bank since 1948. 1993, 14.
[26] Dexter Van Zile, “The Palestinian Christians Defending Hamas“, The Algemeiner, 14 July 2021.
[27] M. Durie, 160.
[28] M. Durie, 203. See also “Bethlehem Churches Bear Brunt of Religious Hatred“, Israel Behind theNews, 1 September 2008.
[29] Dr. Edy Cohen, “The Persecution of Christians in the Palestinian Authority“, BESA, 27 May 2019.
[30] Habib C. Malik , “The Body and the Blood: The Holy Land’s Christians at the Turn of a New Millennium, A Reporter’s Journey“, First Things, 1 June 2002.
___
Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
28 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
22 October 2026
2.9 MINS
Victoria Labor’s promise to fund free abortions has drawn a forceful response from Presbyterian leaders, raising profound questions about unborn life, government priorities and Australia’s moral direction.
22 October 2026
4.7 MINS
Western Australia’s proposed anti-discrimination overhaul has sparked warnings from Christian leaders that religious freedom, parental choice and faith-based schools’ ability to uphold their beliefs are at risk.
22 October 2026
5 MINS
Queensland’s newly released abortion statistics reveal the scale of the state’s abortion toll, prompting renewed calls for political accountability, protection of unborn life and an end to parliamentary silence.
22 October 2026
2.9 MINS
An Israeli political candidate claiming a remarkable biblical identity has sparked questions about false messiahs, the Antichrist and how Christians should interpret prophecy.
22 October 2026
6.4 MINS
Victoria’s major parties have both pledged $30 million to fund abortions, prompting fierce criticism from pro-life advocates who say taxpayers deserve better support for mothers and unborn children.
22 October 2026
2.8 MINS
31 October is a historic day of reformation and revival. This end of month, let's gather together on this day which holds deep wells of revival, and ask God to do it again.
21 October 2026
3.5 MINS
The alleged attack on Helen Haines demands condemnation, but rising threats against politicians also raise questions about public trust, political intimidation and selective outrage.







Sobering but great article!!!!
This article is very personal to me, I’m an Evangelical Christian, my family is originally from the Middle East (Beit Jala), their religious background is Orthodox, being brought up in both Catholic and Orthodox religions, born in Chile, we were told that the relationship between Jews an Arabs in Palestine was good, this is obviously not true. Many in my family, most educated people, believe all the lies of Hamas’ propaganda and consequently they hate the Jewish people, they at. are religious, they don’t read the Bible, where God says He will bless those who bless Israel and He will curse those who curse Israel. This is a heavy burden for me, I pray for all of them everyday, they’re family.
Juan, wow, thanks for this your personal story. Colin’s piece shows us how ‘ingrained’ the animosity is between Islam and Christians (and Jews). I am only recently ‘converted’ to this understanding, since 7th October 2023 in fact.
I am reminded of Jeremiah’s testimony, called to testify against a hostile people who ultimately paid the price of their turning away from God. For me, I cling to the promises of God, whether I see them or not. My testimony is that God is most assuredly ‘on the move’ these days in our life time, its so exciting to wait to see ‘what’s next!’
Hi Juan, thankyou for your comment!! I really appreciate what you shared! You really humanized the struggles I was writing about. I am so encouraged that you are praying for your family! God bless, Colin
Colin a brilliant piece! For several months now i have been ‘wrestling’ with the ‘Palestinian Christians’ issue. I have begun to study Mark Durie’s work but this essay has opened the window for me on this critical perspective – the battered wife syndrome. This is so so true. The persecuted, the humiliated, and the marginalized run from ‘conflict’ preferring to ‘submit’ as their means of ‘self preservation’ (for a season). But it is all too short-lived, the battering continues unabated.
I really appreciated the call to the ‘Palestinian Christians’ to look at history and the compare the lot of Christians within Israel within the Arab world in general.
Finally, how salutatory to consider 1948 as a major spiritual event, directed by God, to reestablish a homeland for the Jews, their only safe haven on the planet. So to tacitly side with the Palestinian’s desire is to rebel directly against God! That can never have a good outcome!
This article is very close to me, first I’m an Evangelical Christian, born in Chile of a Palestinian Arabs descent with Orthodox as their religious background. My grandparents migrated in the early 1900s, I got to know the Gospel in Australia, 51 years ago. But many of my family believe the lies of Hamas’ propaganda, and they are against the Jewish people, most of them are educated, but they have fallen in the trap of these evil monsters. They are just following a religion, I’ve been praying for them to get to know the truth. They are family.
The first issue that needs to be understood is that the Church of England has long since eased to be Christian in any sense of the word as encapsulated by King Charles’s adulation of Islam in the face of the crisis his own subjects are being forced to contend with.
Second issue: taqiyyah, or “holy deception” as a means of conquering more territory is a core Islamic tenet:
https://schnellmann.org/taqiyyah.html
We are in Israel at this very moment. We’ve been to the west bank etc. and know directly about this issue and will write shortly on this topic with first hand accounts of what is happening on the ground.
I will address that dark issue of some Christians funding terrorists! This make me weep.
—
Also…. my item on Kairos II https://dailydeclaration.org.au/2026/07/24/kairos-ii-a-theological-and-historical-critique/
“To detach Jesus from his Jewish identity is to detach Christianity from its roots.”
The overarching intention being to replace Him with the Mahdi ?
https://joelstrumpet.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Islamic-Antichrist.pdf
What’s also noteworthy is that the Palestinian “Christian” cause is also being pushed by Tucker Carlson courtesy Alexander Dugin:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkL373C-FPA
In 1980, Dugin joined the “Yuzhinsky circle [ru]”, an elitist Satanic cult immersed in “esoteric” Nazism and other forms of the occult.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/russ.12048
He became caught up in séances, Ouija boards, Sufism and trances accordingly.
Wolfram Sievers, the notorious Nazi researcher of the paranormal became his alter ego
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=QdHADwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
[https://books.google.com.au/books?id=c5TBCwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
There’s no record of him renouncing said ventures, a fair indication that his latest fad is of the same Spirit
What’s also noteworthy is that the Palestinian “Christian” cause is also being pushed by Tucker Carlson courtesy Alexander Dugin:
In 1980, Dugin joined the “Yuzhinsky circle [ru]”, an elitist Satanic cult immersed in “esoteric” Nazism and other forms of the occult.
He became caught up in séances, Ouija boards, Sufism and trances accordingly.
Wolfram Sievers, the notorious Nazi researcher of the paranormal became his alter ego
There’s no record of him renouncing said ventures, a fair indication that his latest fad is of the same Spirit
Unfortunately the substantiating links won’t post
Colin Barnard’s article is a heartless, humiliating and erroneous takedown of our suffering Palestinian Christian brethren. My comments are intended to balance the constant bias from media and Christians generally on the very complex Israel-Palestine situation.
I’m a 79 year old evangelical Christian who researched Islam for 25 years and visited 2 Muslim countries to see it on the ground because Islam is a massive threat to the West. I do not support terrorist Hamas. I understand dhimmitude and reject Colin’s dismissive thesis that calls for Palestinian repentance of anti-semitism. I’ve also been to Israel and have felt a deep spiritual affinity with the Jews all my life. Until October, 2023, when a Christian friend told me every Palestinian should be destroyed and my chief elder said Palestinians shouldn’t be there. I was appalled. I thought Christians were to love their enemies. That began ongoing research into 7/10/23 and the events leading up to it. What I discovered forced me to completely change my perspective on Israel and Palestine, based on Scripture, facts and historical evidence.
Being pro-Israel, I started with Jewish rabbis, Israeli historians and IDF testimony. Then I examined Christian scholars and theologians’ books about Israel’s claim to Palestine. I wanted the truth from a biblical perspective. I heard Genesis 12: 1-3 a lot but not the last line which says ‘ALL PEOPLES ON EARTH will be blessed by you’, meaning Gentiles through Jesus Christ. Israel, I was told, is sinful but God loves them anyway and they will all be converted in the end, based on Romans 11: 26. ‘All Israel’ could also mean all the Jews who receive Christ as Saviour. Would Romans 11: 26 nullify Romans 2: 28,29; 1 Peter 2: 4,5, 9; Ephesians 2: 14-22 and Galatians and Hebrews, which were written to emphasize that it’s Jews and Gentiles who receive Christ and are now the chosen Bride of Christ?
Modern Israel is 80% atheist. Although we hear about Israel’s historic claim to the Promised Land, we do not hear about Leviticus 25: 23 where God says, ‘ The land must not be sold permanently because THE LAND IS MINE and you are but aliens and My TENANTS…’ [Emphasis mine] Jesus Himself confirmed this in the parable of the tenants (Luke 20: 9-19). The modern State of Israel has no claim to Palestine that God supports without faith in Him and obedience to His law and they have never done so.
Israel is the product of Zionists and not all Jews are Zionists. Atheist Eastern European Zionists infiltrated Judaism to rule and reign the world from Jerusalem. Greater Israel is just the start. Millions of orthodox Jews and rabbis worldwide (including many who live in Israel) have never believed God approved the State of Israel. They believe God must send the Messiah before they will have a legitimate national kingdom.
I discovered I was an unwitting Christian Zionist. PreTrib rapture was the only view I’d ever heard in the different denominations the Lord has led me into over 60 years. This eschatology was based on Dispensationalism, in which the Jews remain the chosen people and God has a separate plan of salvation for them than for the church. Christ is a parenthesis between the two eras of Israel. He is not the crux of the Bible and the only means of salvation for all by faith in His atoning death and resurrection. Dispensationalism is a different gospel. Its offshoot, Christian Zionism is a cult, an attempt to weld together two completely different belief systems, Christianity and atheistic Zionism.
What began as an investigation into the truth about how and what Hamas actually did on 7/10/23 revealed a disproportionate response that Israel has always enacted against anyone it views as an enemy. It has a very sophisticated and well funded propaganda/soft power weapon which is all most of us have ever heard. Israel’s right to exist doesn’t extend to genocide of Palestinians within its borders or Lebanese, Syrians, Turks or anyone else outside its borders just because they’re Muslim. Israel really is a colonial, apartheid, racist State and has never been a democracy. It also discriminates between Jewish ethnic groups and discourages intermarriage between European Ashkenazi Jews and other Jews because it considers Ashkenazis are more intelligent.
The more I learnt about Judaism, it also became apparent that Israelis are not the descendants of biblical Israel. Judaism is a new religion from the Pharisees after 70 AD based on the Babylonian Talmud and the Kabbalah. There are different ‘denominations’ within Judaism. The Chabad Lubervitch is one, an extremely wealthy and influential group promoting the 7 Noahide Laws to bring morality and monotheistic worship to the whole world. The only religion that will not be tolerated will be Christianity because it’s idolatrous (3 gods). Judaism, like Islam, is based on law and regards unbelievers as animals, who do not have a soul like Jews. Both religions use beheading for goyim/infidel disobedience.
Christians have been beguiled into believing the modern State of Israel is ‘God’s timepiece’ heralding the beginning of the end times. That falsehood is based on a literal reading of the Bible and the Notes in criminal Cyrus Schofield’s translation of the Bible which was mysteriously funded and then printed by the Rothchilds’ Oxford Press. When scrutinised, today’s Israel bears no resemblance to biblical Israel. It is a counterfeit. A terrible Satanic deception against Christians to gain their support and finances, primarily through the US and its military.
Christian Zionists encompassing vast swathes of evangelicalism and the charismatic-Pentecostal churches now believe they are involved in a holy war, a spiritual and political struggle between light and dark. It’s causing havoc worldwide and especially for the people of the Middle East. The Jewish led American war effort against Iran has incited Muslims as far away as Nigeria and Pakistan to counter ‘the crusaders’ and attack Christians in these countries.
Judaism is hostile to Christianity. Israel’s actions against the Palestinians and others in the Middle East mirror the horrors done to them in the Holocaust and blaspheme the name of our LORD. If their endless warfare is supposedly justified by our God, neither Muslims nor any non-Christian will be attracted to the gospel of Jesus Christ.
I urge Christian readers to be informed! Look up the Noahide Laws. Listen to Professors Norman Finkelstein and Yakov Rabkin. Read DeAnne Loper’s book KABBALAH SECRETS CHRISTIANS NEED TO KNOW. And pray for the Jews and the Palestinians. We will be next.
I will answer in more detail later.
But for now explain to me why these ‘Christians’ literally fund terrorists?
Your comment is full of lies and mistruths being propagated at this time.
I spent this afternoon in Jerusalem at Christ Church in the old with a friend to is Arab Christian.
His story bears repeating…
A dear friend Yusuf, not his real name for security reasons, is an Arab Christian Israeli living in Judea, he works with youth and helps people with PTSD due to his psychology qualifications.
We sat with Yusuf in our apartment in Jerusalem while he recounted the following:
Yusuf was born in Israel in an Arab town to Arab Israeli and Gazan parents.
From age 4 till teens Yusuf lived in Gaza, they left in 2005 when Israel withdrew all Jews and handed Gaza over to Arab rule and settled in Israel.
Yusuf’s best friend Damir (again name altered) growing up, also a Christian, was Gazan and could not leave in 2005. Damir married and they had a daughter.
Early in 2024 Hamas setup rocket launchers in the Church and started attacking Israel. Hamas held many of the congregation hostage in the Church while launching rockets.
The Israeli Air Force (IAF) blew up the rocket launching base, the Church and the hostages were killed.
We wept with Yusuf as he shared this horror.
What should have the IAF done? Continued to allow Israel to be attacked?
This is the dilemma Israel faces in dealing with Hamas, PIJ, Hezbollah, Iran, etc. who use civilians and civilian infrastructure to wage war.
It is worth noting that the civilian casualty ratio is 1:1.8 in Gaza vs a 1:9 global average. This is the lowest civilian casualty rate by far for any similar urban conflict.
THIS IS BECAUSE ISRAEL HAS GONE OUT OF ITS WAY TO PROTECT CIVILIANS!
Israel is the only military in the world that drops leaflets, sends text messages, uses “knock bombs,” announces their plan to attack by drones so that civilians can escape. The civilians who try to leave are often shot by Hamas and are included in their count of dead or injured civilians.
Israel is by no means perfect, but are they accountable. E.g. If IDF soldiers do the wrong thing they are punished, i.e. gaoled. They do the best to adhere to basic humanity.
Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, PIJ, et. al. on the other hand?
Kym I commend you on this post, I think it is a brilliant response to those who, through no fault of their own, have accepted the most widely accepted narrative. It is so hard to push back when the majority have a different view of reality. All the more reason to keep bringing the alternative perspective into focus.
Next… Jews are Jews – including Ashkenazi – check the DNA !!
This destroys a major antiIsrael argument about so called European colonisation after WWII being not real ethnic Jews.
Also the majority of Jews in Israel are from those ejected from Arab countries in 1948/49 (850,000+), i.e Mizrachi and Sephardic. Only ~20% in Israel are Ashkenazi, but this fact matters little as they are actual Jews – end of story.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20560205/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19161619/
In this video, Dr. Ron Cantor walks through two decades of peer-reviewed population genetics research — including the landmark work of Dr. Harry Ostrer, Dr. Doron Behar, and Dr. Almut Nebel — showing that Ashkenazi, Sephardic, and Mizrahi Jews all carry significant Levantine ancestry tracing back to the Iron Age land of Israel. Three exiles, three diaspora communities, one shared point of origin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHVI-pU6jR8
Next … ‘Dispensationalism’ part 1
Below are 10 quotations from early church fathers that strongly reflect the idea of distinct administrations (“economies”) in God’s redemptive plan.
While they do not present a fully developed modern dispensational system, the language and concepts often sound strikingly similar to later dispensational theology.
Thus we see dispensational theology pre-dates Darby by more then 1,500 years.
The key Greek term used by many fathers is “oikonomia” (economy/administration)—the same concept behind the biblical word translated “dispensation” in Ephesians 3:2.
1. Irenaeus – God works through different covenants in different ages
Irenaeus (c.130–202)
“The law was a preparation for the Gospel… God introduced different covenants suited to different ages of mankind.”
(Against Heresies 4.9.3)
This clearly teaches progressive stages in God’s dealings with humanity.
2. Irenaeus – Distinct dispensations throughout history
“There is therefore one God the Father… who has formed and arranged all things according to His dispensations for the salvation of mankind.”
(Against Heresies 3.16.6)
The word translated dispensations comes from oikonomia.
3. Irenaeus – Progressive revelation through successive eras
“For inasmuch as God is always the same, He has nevertheless varied the covenant according to the times, and adapted it to the human race.”
(Against Heresies 4.11.2)
This resembles the idea that God administers different rules or responsibilities in different periods.
4. Justin Martyr – The Mosaic law as a temporary dispensation
Justin Martyr (c.100–165)
“God commanded you to keep the Sabbath, not because He needed such observances, but on account of your sins and the hardness of your hearts.” (Dialogue with Trypho 18)
Justin argues that the Mosaic system was temporary, anticipating a new covenant.
5. Justin Martyr – A new law replacing the old
“For the law promulgated on Horeb is now old, and belongs to yourselves alone; but this is for all universally.” (Dialogue with Trypho 11)
This reflects a transition from the Mosaic dispensation to the universal gospel age.
6. Tertullian – God organizes history into divine economies
Tertullian (c.155–220)
“The Creator… distributed the times and seasons and arranged the divine economies according to the order of the ages.” (Against Marcion 4.11)
This language is extremely close to dispensational terminology.
7. Clement of Alexandria – God educating humanity in stages
Clement of Alexandria (c.150–215)
“Before the coming of the Lord, philosophy was necessary to the Greeks for righteousness… as the Law also was to the Jews.” (Stromata 1.5)
Clement sees different divine administrations given to different peoples before Christ.
8. Hippolytus – Successive eras in God’s plan
Hippolytus of Rome (c.170–235)
“The law and the prophets continued until John… after which the kingdom of heaven is preached.” (Fragments on Daniel)
This recognises a clear transition in God’s redemptive administration.
9. Augustine – Distinct historical ages
Augustine of Hippo (354–430)
“The divine Scripture speaks of six ages of the world, as of six days, in which the human race is gradually educated.” ( City of God 22.30)
Augustine viewed history as structured into eras of divine activity.
Augustine described different ages in salvation history.
In City of God he divides history into six ages, paralleling the six days of creation.
These ages included:
– Adam to Noah
– Noah to Abraham
– Abraham to David
– David to the exile
– Exile to Christ
– Christ to the end
Though not dispensational in the modern sense, Augustine still recognised distinct historical administrations of God’s plan.
10. Irenaeus – Humanity matured through successive stages
“God formed man at the beginning… and permitted him to pass through every stage of discipline, that he might attain to maturity.” (*Against Heresies* 4.38.1)
This reflects the idea that God progressively advances His plan through stages.
— Why these quotations matter?
These passages demonstrate that long before John Nelson Darby (1800–1882):
Early Christian writers already taught:
• Successive divine economies
• Different covenants for different eras
• Progressive revelation
• Transitions between historical administrations
• Distinct phases of God’s redemptive plan
Darby did not invent the concept, but rather systematised and expanded earlier theological ideas that were already present in the early church.
In short: The early church fathers did not develop a full modern dispensational system, but their language about divine economies, successive covenants, and historical stages in God’s plan shows that the core concept of dispensational thinking existed many centuries before Darby.
Next … ‘Dispensationalism’ part 2
Christian dispensationalism (I don’t use this term as it is just simple Biblical prophecy unfolding over time) is a framework for understanding the Bible that emphasises how God administers His redemptive plan through distinct historical stages (dispensations). Each stage involves a particular revelation from God, human responsibility, a test of obedience, human failure, and then a new phase of God’s plan.
The concept is built primarily from the biblical idea of **“dispensation” or “administration” (Greek: oikonomia), which appears in the New Testament.
1. The biblical basis for dispensations
The idea comes from passages where Scripture describes different administrations of God’s plan.
Key verses
Ephesians 1:10 “That in the dispensation of the fullness of times He might gather together in one all things in Christ…”
Ephesians 3:2 “If indeed you have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which was given to me for you.”
Colossians 1:25 “According to the dispensation from God which was given to me for you, to fulfill the word of God.”
These verses indicate that God manages history through specific administrations or stewardships.
2. Progressive revelation in the Bible
Dispensationalism emphasizes that God reveals His will progressively over time.
Hebrews 1:1–2 “God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by His Son.”
This shows that different eras had different levels of revelation.
3. Distinct covenants and responsibilities in Scripture
The Bible itself shows that God gave different commands to people in different eras.
Examples:
Before the Flood, People were originally partly vegetarian.
Genesis 1:29 “I have given you every herb bearing seed… it shall be for food.”
After the Flood, Humans were permitted to eat animals.
Genesis 9:3 “Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you.”
Under the Mosaic Law, Israel received a national law system.
Exodus 19:5–6 “If you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be a special treasure to Me above all people.”
In the Church Age
Believers are not under the Mosaic Law. Romans 6:14 “You are not under law but under grace.”
4. The distinction between Israel and the Church
A central feature of dispensational theology is that Israel and the Church have distinct roles in God’s plan.
Israel, God made specific national promises to Israel.
Genesis 12:2–3 “I will make you a great nation… and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.”
Jeremiah 31:35–37 This passage states that Israel will continue as a nation before God forever.
The Church. The Church is a distinct body formed through faith in Christ.
Ephesians 3:6 “That the Gentiles should be fellow heirs… and partakers of His promise in Christ through the gospel.”
1 Corinthians 10:32
Paul distinguishes three groups:
“Give no offense, either to the Jews or to the Greeks or to the church of God.”
The bible clearly shows that the Church is separate from Israel in God’s program.
5. The commonly identified dispensations
There are seven major dispensations derived from Scripture.
1. Innocence – Adam before the Fall
Genesis 1–3
Humanity lived in perfect fellowship with God but failed through disobedience.
2. Conscience – Fall to the Flood
Genesis 3–8
Humanity governed by moral conscience but descended into violence.
3. Human Government – After the Flood
Genesis 9
God instituted human authority and capital punishment.
4. Promise – Abraham to Moses
Genesis 12 – Exodus 19
God dealt with the patriarchs through promises.
5. Law – Moses to Christ
Exodus 20 – Acts 2
Israel lived under the Mosaic covenant.
6. Grace – The Church Age
Acts 2 – present
Salvation is proclaimed through the gospel to all nations.
Ephesians 2:8–9 “For by grace you have been saved through faith…”
7. Kingdom – The Millennial reign of Christ
Revelation 20
Christ rules on earth for 1000 years.
Revelation 20:4 “They lived and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.”
6. The future restoration of Israel
Biblical prophecy holds that God’s promises to Israel will be literally fulfilled.
Key passages:
Romans 11:25–26 “Blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And so all Israel will be saved.”
Zechariah 12:10 “They will look on Me whom they pierced.”
7. The ultimate goal of all dispensations
All stages of history lead toward the universal reign of Christ.
Revelation 11:15 “The kingdoms of this world have become the kingdoms of our Lord and of His Christ.”
Ephesians 1:10
God’s plan is to unite all things in Christ.
Summary
Biblical dispensationalism teaches that:
• God administers history through distinct stewardships (dispensations/economies/administrations)
• Revelation unfolds progressively through Scripture
• Israel and the Church have distinct roles in God’s plan
• God’s promises to Israel will be literally fulfilled in the future
• All history moves toward the kingdom of Christ
The system was later organised by various theologians, but its core ideas arise directly from the structure of the biblical narrative itself.
Further… we MUST understand God is true to His word and His covenants. God DOES NOT LIE.
A big question… Is God a liar in terms of His covenants?
The question of whether God’s covenant with Israel is eternal can be examined through key biblical covenants associated with Abraham, Moses, David, and the New Covenant.
1. The Abrahamic Covenant
The covenant with Abraham is foundational for Israel, promising land, descendants, and blessing. In Genesis 17:7, God says, “I will establish my covenant as an everlasting covenant between me and you and your descendants after you for the generations to come, to be your God and the God of your descendants after you.” The term “everlasting” (Hebrew: *olam*) suggests permanence. Genesis 17:8 further promises the land of Canaan to Abraham’s offspring “as an everlasting possession.” This covenant is reiterated in Genesis 15:18, where God binds Himself to the promise without conditions on Abraham’s part, emphasising its unilateral and eternal nature. The covenant’s focus on Abraham’s descendants through Isaac (Genesis 17:19) ties it directly to Israel, indicating an enduring commitment. Also Psalm 147:19-20 continues the promise to Yakov (Israel).
2. The Mosaic Covenant
The covenant with Moses, given at Sinai, includes the Law and establishes Israel as a “kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Exodus 19:5-6). Unlike the Abrahamic covenant, this covenant is conditional, requiring Israel’s obedience: “If you obey me fully and keep my covenant, then out of all nations you will be my treasured possession” (Exodus 19:5). Deuteronomy 28 outlines blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience, suggesting the covenant’s benefits depend on Israel’s faithfulness. However, Leviticus 26:44-45 states that even if Israel is unfaithful, God will not “reject them or abhor them so as to destroy them completely, breaking my covenant with them,” recalling the covenant with their ancestors (Abraham). This implies that while the Mosaic covenant’s blessings are conditional, God’s commitment to Israel’s existence endures, rooted in the Abrahamic promise.
3. The Davidic Covenant
God’s covenant with David promises an eternal dynasty: “Your house and your kingdom will endure forever before me; your throne will be established forever” (2 Samuel 7:16). Psalm 89:3-4 reinforces this: “I have made a covenant with my chosen one, I have sworn to David my servant, ‘I will establish your line forever and make your throne firm through all generations.’” The term “forever” underscores permanence. This covenant focuses on the Davidic line ruling Israel, suggesting an eternal role for Israel as a nation under God’s chosen king. Even when Israel faced exile, passages like Jeremiah 33:20-21 affirm that God’s covenant with David (and the Levites) is as unbreakable as the day and night, reinforcing its eternal tie to Israel.
4. The New Covenant
The New Covenant, prophesied in Jeremiah 31:31-34, is explicitly made “with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah.” It promises forgiveness of sins and a new relationship with God: “I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people” (Jeremiah 31:33). The eternal nature is implied in Jeremiah 32:40: “I will make an everlasting covenant with them: I will never stop doing good to them.” Ezekiel 37:26-28 also ties this covenant to Israel, promising an “everlasting covenant” of peace and God’s presence among them forever. In the New Testament, Hebrews 8:8-12 cites Jeremiah 31, applying the New Covenant to believers, including both Jews and Gentiles through Christ (Hebrews 9:15). However, the original promise in Jeremiah is directed to Israel, showing continuity with prior covenants.
The BIG question raised: Is the Covenant with Israel Eternal?
The Abrahamic and Davidic covenants explicitly use “everlasting” language, tying God’s promises to Israel’s existence, land, and Davidic rule. The Mosaic covenant, while conditional in its blessings, does not negate God’s enduring commitment to Israel as a people, as seen in Leviticus 26 and its link to the Abrahamic promise. The New Covenant, while fulfilled in Christ and extended to all believers, is rooted in God’s promises to Israel and Judah, maintaining continuity with the earlier covenants.
Romans 11:25-29 provides insight: Paul states that “Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in,” yet “all Israel will be saved” because “God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable.” This shows that God’s covenantal relationship with Israel remains intact, even as the New Covenant broadens salvation. The eternal nature of these covenants is tied to God’s faithfulness, not Israel’s performance, as seen in passages like Psalm 105:8-10: “He remembers his covenant forever, the promise he made, for a thousand generations, the covenant he made with Abraham, the oath he swore to Isaac. He confirmed it to Jacob as a decree, to Israel as an everlasting covenant.”
Conclusion
Based on the biblical references, God’s covenant with Israel-through Abraham, Moses, David, and the New Covenant-is eternal in its core commitments to Israel’s existence as God’s people, their connection to the land, and their role in God’s redemptive plan. While the Mosaic covenant’s blessings are conditional, the overarching promises to Abraham, David, and through the New Covenant use “everlasting” language, affirmed by God’s irrevocable call in Romans 11. Thus, the covenants collectively point to an enduring relationship with Israel, fulfilled ultimately through Christ in the New Covenant, which includes but does not replace Israel’s unique role.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m03PAH7Z-VM
Sitting here walking distance from the Old City and the Mt of Olives (where Yeshua will soon come and rule and reign for 1000 years) I can attest that Jews are now more open to Yeshua than ever before.
In the last month I have spoken with many Jews here in Israel. No one has been closed to discussions.
Some conversations have been very deep and we we able to share our testimonies of how Yeshua saved us.
We have also spent time with Arabs, including believers and Church leaders. They love and support Israel. Even Taxi drivers said they don’t want to live without Israel as they are free.
In the Bible Jesus had a special condemnation for a particular sect of the Jews , who just happen to be around today under a different name . This sect hates Jesus with a passion and according their Talmud -Jesus is in Hell boiling in hot excrement . Like Christianity there are good Jews and bad Jews ( if indeed you can call them Jews at all ) . So as we reach a climax in end time eschatology remember folks not all is at it seems . Trust in the LORD that He may give us all discernment for His truth in todays troubling times .
The folly of using His MATT 23 rebuke of Pharisaical Judaism in support of demonically-inspired fantasies about the Talmud is, spelled out in 2 of the follow-up passages of the self same chapter:
1) In the wake of said rebuke He proceeds to remind a goy woman, on no uncertain terms, that His mission remains primarily towards His Own, quote:
“I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
“It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.”
https://biblehub.com/bsb/matthew/15.htm
2) The closing line reads quote: “For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, ‘Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.’ ” – MATT 23: 39
What’s also noteworthy is that the Palestinian “Christian” cause is also being pushed by Tucker Carlson courtesy Alexander Dugin:
And DugIn’s un-renounced trail is a fair indication of who’s actually steering the ship:
LINK WON”T POST
In 1980 he joined the “Yuzhinsky circle [ru]”, an elitist Satanic cult immersed in “esoteric” Nazism and other forms of the occult:
LINK WON”T POST
He became caught up in séances, Ouija boards, Sufism and trances accordingly.
Wolfram Sievers, the notorious Nazi researcher of the paranormal became his alter ego
LINK WON”T POST
I’ve recently returned to the church after spending most of my life agnostic because I’ve had an overwhelming feeling that something really bad is going on.
I am not very educated in Christianity or Islam, but had been considering the end times prophecies and noticed how they were similar.
I thought, if Islam recognizes most of the same people then why are we fighting? Is it because of the corruption of mankind?
I see the truth now.
We need to get out strength back and stop compromising our faith for those who refuse to compromise theirs.
I highly recommend this channel on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/live/kN-KdJZ2WP4?si=PBN4QJlYhA860eXn
Thank you, Colin, for exposing the true situation of the Anglican Christian church in many countries and the serious lies about Kaoris 2. Those taken in by fearing Islam and trying to appease those who are bent on killing Jews or punishing them, have fallen for the lies of the Aljazeera news reports which always blame Israel and the IDF for any situation that leads to a loss of life in Gaza.
The exaggeration and twisting of statistics regarding deaths in Gaza and the total bias of the Arab driven media is akin to Hitler’s program in WW2. In those days of Propaganda Hitler seduced the church and pretended he was on their side but used it for his overall aim of exterminating all Jewish people. he began with small reprisals but soon a Jew and German ‘Gentile’ could not been seen together, jobs were lost, businesses and houses taken and the gradual plan of sending Jewish families to concentration camps in order to kill them became a reality, plus death for any civilians who sided with them.
Even now with Oct 7th commemorations (3 yrs later) we have heard little about the slaughter of almost 1,200 Jews who died at the hands of the Hamas who invaded their land and spent 16 years building underground tunnels into Israel, in order to do this. Nor have we heard of the years spent living underground and torture of the hostages or the rape of women or beheading of babies…Instead Palestinian protest marches have been allowed to exist on Oct 7 here in Australia which seems to be perpetuating a lie about the reality of what really happened Oct 2023 – just like the Holocaust- -some pretend it never occurred and try to blot it out.
I think the church (of any denomination) has the obligation to allow Israel to defend her land. Those who read Genesis and the Bible know it was given by God to Abraham and His seed. The Body of Christ also needs to remember and acknowledge that we worship a Jewish messiah who died on the cross in our place and rose again. This Messiah was born of a long line of Jewish ancestry with several gentiles included within the family tree (such as Ruth the Moabitess who Married Boaz) .
As you said above Colin the churches that try to change the truth and ignore the fact that God chose to give the land to Israel need to repent of falling prey to media lies and distorted version of Israeli’s heritage and to read biblical passages such as Romans 9-11 and the Book of Revelation with the 12 tribes of Israel being seen in heaven, along with gentile believers grafted in from every tribe and nation.
May God help all to see the truth of the Bible and God’s call to Israel first, and then the gracious act of adding Gentiles in. God will bring His word to pass. Heaven and earth will fall away but God says His word will come to pass.
Thanks for all the feedback!!
Several replies raised a few questions, I will try and answer two of them first;
1. There is the question of Zionism. What is it?
Zionism (an ever-changing mix of idealism, faith, and fear) began as a desperate effort to rescue the doomed Jews of Europe from imminent catastrophe. It was only after the Kishnev pogroms of 1903 that Herzl suggested Uganda as a safe half-way house, anything to remove the Jews in Europe from danger. It was the forced compromise of a man desperate to rescue his people. He was amazed when the delegates from Kishnev itself insisted that Jerusalem was non-negotiable. As the Jewish Chronicle put it in 1904, “Dr. Herzl led a great movement, or rather he voiced a great despair. At a moment when the Jews of Eastern Europe had abandoned hope of justice from the nations, he came forward boldly to give tongue to their feelings.” After this, things continued to spiral down towards catastrophe. In WW1, 300,000 Jews were forced from their homes in Galatia by the Russian army. After WW1, 100,000 Jews were massacred in the Ukraine, there were further massacres in Hungary (1919-1924) and in Poland. Then the Nazis came to power in Germany.
Jews desperate to flee to safety found the doors to the nations of the world shut. Conferences in Evian (1938) and Bermuda (1943) showed that the world knew what was happening to Jews in Nazi occupied Europe but refused to take in Jewish refugees. After Evian, Nazi propaganda itself highlighted the outcome: foreign governments criticized Germany’s treatment of Jews yet would not take them. Chaim Weizmann commented that the world was divided into places where Jews could not live and places where they could not enter. And an American writer wrote: “What is to be done with these people, with the millions who are clawing like frantic beasts at the dark walls of the suffocating chambers where they are imprisoned? The Christian world has practically abandoned them, and sits by with hardly an observable twinge of conscience in the midst of this terrible catastrophe.”
The one place where fleeing Jews were wanted, welcomed and loved was with the Jewish communities in Palestine. This is Zionism. Britain had however also shut to the door to Jewish refugees trying to enter Palestine, so far fewer were able to escape than would otherwise have been the case. And six million were brutally murdered in the Holocaust. It has been said that the great tragedy of Zionism is that it was proved to be correct.
Prior to this largely unimaginable horror, many 19th century Jewish people did indeed reject Zionism. They felt efforts would be better directed to alleviating the sufferings of Jews within Europe, rather than advocating for the extreme measure of a mass evacuation. At the time, it was a legitimate discussion over how best to help. This view was shown to have been hopelessly wrong by the horrors of the Holocaust. It was said of the Jews of Europe that the optimists (who hoped things would get better) went to Auschwitz (and were murdered) and the pessimists went to Palestine (and lived). For people today to quote the optimists after that event, as ammunition against Zionism, against those who survived, is unbelievable.
2. So, to Palestine.
An empty land? No. As for “a people without a land for a land without a people” obviously there was an existent population in Palestine. It was however largely underpopulated. Just prior to the Jewish War in 66AD, the population was about 2.3 million. In 1800 it was 300k – just 13% of what it had been 1800 years earlier. Globally, human numbers tripled during that time. “The country is in a considerable degree empty of inhabitants” said British consul James Finn in 1857. In 1869, Mark Twain wrote “Palestine is desolate.” (See also Leviticus 26:34.) So, was the country empty? No, but it was massively underpopulated, and well able to provide sanctuary for refugees fleeing pogroms, massacre and genocide.
Early Jewish settlements in Palestine were all legally bought according to the laws of the day, either under Ottoman rule, or British. Nor did the Jewish community desire to steal land! They simply desired to live free from oppression. In 1926, Ben Gurion wrote that; “the Arab community is an organic, inextricable part of Palestine.; it is embedded in the country where it toils and where it will stay. It is not to disinherit this community nor to thrive on its destruction that Zionism came into being … Only a madman can attribute such a desire to the Jewish people in Palestine. Palestine will belong to the Jewish people and its Arab inhabitants.” In 1937, he wrote; We do not wish and do not need to expel Arabs and take their place. All our aspiration is built on the assumption – proven throughout all our activity in the Land – that there is enough room in the country for ourselves and the Arabs.” Again in 1937, at the Twentieth Zionist Congress, he declared; “No Jewish State, big or small, in part of the country or in its entirety will be [truly] established so long as the land of the prophets does not witness the realize of the great and moral ideals nourished in our hearts for generations; one law for all residents, just rule, love for ones neighbour, true equality.” In 1938, in its submission to the Peel commission, the Zionist movement undertook “not only to respect the civil and religious rights of its non-Jewish citizens, but also to safeguard and, to the best of its ability, to improve their positions.”
Ze’ev Jabotinsky foresaw the Arab minority as full citizens, participating on an equal footing “throughout all sectors of the country’s public life.” As early as 1905 he stated that “we must treat the Arabs correctly and affably, without any violence or injustice.”
Interestingly, he believed that a weak Jewish community would always be rejected by the Arab community, and that only a strong Jewish community would be able to live in peace with its Arab neighbours. In his famous article; “The Iron Wall” he argued that the Jewish community needed to be as strong as an iron wall. “not till then will they [the local Arab leaders] drop their extremist leaders, whose watchword is ‘never!’ And the leadership will pass to the moderate groups who will approach us with a proposal that we should both agree to mutual concessions. Then we may expect them to discuss honestly practical questions, such as a guarantee against Arab displacement, or equal rights for Arab citizens, or Arab national integrity. And when this happens, I am convinced that we Jews will be found ready to give them satisfactory guarantees, so that both peoples can live together in peace, like good neighbours. … I consider it absolutely impossible to eject the Arabs from Palestine. There will always be two nations in Palestine – which is good enough for me, provided the Jews become the majority. … I am prepared to take an oath binding ourselves and our descendants that we shall never do anything contrary to the principle of equal rights, that we shall never try to eject anyone. This seems to me a fairly peaceful credo.”
In 1934 he presided over the drafting of a constitution for Jewish Palestine. According to it, Jews and Arabs were to share the prerogatives and duties of statehood. Hebrew and Arabic were to enjoy the same legal standing. He also affirmed to the Peel Commission his view that “on a long view, the Jewish village cannot prosper unless the Arab village prospers with it.”
In his 1922 White Paper, Churchill wrote; “it has been observed with satisfaction that at the meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims, “the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development.”
As Anglican clergyman James Parkes noted; “That this world was still-born was not the fault of the Jews.”
The Christian community are severely persecuted in West Bank. Towns that were predominantly Christian are being relentlessly infiltrated and replaced by Muslims. On the other hand, Christians in Israel enjoy total freedom of worship. These Kairos mob in no way represent the true picture. The claim that Israel practices apartheid is comical. Just another example of the tide of growing anti semitism. Thankyou for this article which corrects popular myths and theologically driven Jew hatred.