COVID-19 Far Less Deadly for Non-Elderly than Original Estimates: Study
A peer-reviewed study published this month at Science Direct found the infection fatality rate (IFR) for non-elderly people who contracted COVID-19 was far lower than original, widely-publicised estimates.
The report compiled data from 31 national seroprevalence studies that took place before mRNA injections were rolled out and before the appearance of the milder Omicron variant. It found that the median infection fatality rate of COVID-19 was 0.0003% at 0–19 years, 0.002% at 20–29 years, 0.011% at 30–39 years, 0.035% at 40–49 years, 0.123% at 50–59 years, and 0.506% at 60–69 years.
These figures stand in stark contrast to the 0.6% to 1% IFR cited by government officials and media publications, and used to justify draconian lockdowns and mRNA mandates in 2020–2021.
As recently as November 2022, for instance, AAP Factcheck used two-year-old data indicating a COVID-19 IFR of 0.4% for people aged 55 years old and 1.4% for those aged 65 — figures approximately three times higher than the results from the latest study.
Authoritative Research
The recent report was co-authored by John Ioannidis, one of the world’s most-cited and most influential physicians.
As the recent report highlights, 94% of the global population is younger than 70 years and 86% is younger than 60 years. For all people in those age brackets globally, it was found that the median COVID-19 IFR may have been as low as 0.07% and 0.03% respectively.
The subjects of the recent study were people who had not experienced a prior COVID-19 infection and were yet to take an mRNA injection — suggesting that today’s COVID-19 IFR would likely be far lower still.
Ignored
The peer-reviewed study, published in the journal Environmental Research on January 1st of this year, is yet to receive attention in the mainstream press.
The study further vindicates the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD), which as early as October 2020 advocated for focused protection for the elderly and at-risk.
The GBD has garnered almost 1 million signatures globally, though its authors faced censorship on social media for their advocacy of a measured approach to COVID-19.
___
Photo by cottonbro.
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
12 October 2026
3.1 MINS
The proposed livestream of Nidal Hasan’s execution has reignited debate over justice, deterrence and public accountability, with critics comparing American justice to ISIS propaganda.
6 October 2026
3.4 MINS
Christians cannot afford to let headlines and social media shape their view of Israel. Scripture provides a foundation for understanding Israel, God’s promises and our response.
6 October 2026
6.7 MINS
Fresh revelations about the foiled FlyDubai terror plot expose the attacker’s alleged extremist history, while a courageous pilot’s actions prevented an unthinkable catastrophe.
6 October 2026
6.2 MINS
Britain’s grooming gang scandal exposes a devastating failure to protect vulnerable children, raising urgent questions about political correctness, accountability, immigration and the loss of moral courage.
5 October 2026
4.9 MINS
Free Speech Union co-founder Reuben Kirkham warns Australia’s proposed Digital Duty of Care could expand censorship powers, undermine free expression and bypass recent legal protections.
2 October 2026
6.6 MINS
A foiled airline attack highlights the courage of passengers and crew who confronted danger, while raising urgent questions about jihadist terrorism and the ideology behind it.
1 October 2026
6.2 MINS
A foiled terror plot at RAF Fairford highlights the vigilance of local residents, heightened threats to Western military bases, and growing concerns over Iran’s role.
Thank you Kurt. As numerically illiterate as I am and trust me , I am. Even I understand what you have written.
May We thank God for the grace of His truth .