Australia’s Largest Christian News Site

“Woke Christianity” is growing in popularity — but it’s also a contradiction in terms. More than a political movement, wokeness is a rival religion. Learn how Christians can respond to this movement with clarity and conviction.

In his book Live Not by Lies, Rod Dreher shares powerful stories from Christians who survived life under Soviet totalitarianism.

One of these saints was Milada Schirger, a Czech dissident imprisoned for her political views. She warned that the West is now facing a similar danger — a growing pressure to conform to certain ideas or be silenced and even punished for dissent.

Notably, believers like Milada warn that the West’s growing “soft totalitarianism” isn’t just coming from outside the church, but from inside as well. When churches and Christian institutions start bending to the spirit of the age instead of standing firm on the truth, they risk losing their freedom and becoming tools of control.

The spirit of our age — sometimes referred to as “wokeness” — is a set of beliefs that clothes itself in words like justice and compassion but radically rejects some of the central claims of the Bible. This dogma creeps into churches, seminaries and ministries — not as an obvious enemy, but as a false version of the gospel, recruiting Christian goodwill in service of a new agenda. While promising freedom, it delivers bondage.

History shows what happens when churches give in to the pressure of their times: they stop being faithful witnesses and instead become servants of the powers that be. In these challenging times, the Western church must resist woke ideology with courage, and stay true to the faith once for all delivered to the saints.

To resist wokeness, we first need to understand it. Where did it come from? What claims does it make? How does it disguise itself? What threat does it pose to believers? And how can we steel ourselves — standing firm on God’s Word — in the days ahead?

Let’s dive in.

Lessons from the State-Controlled Church

To see what’s at stake today, let us first look back at how Communist regimes in China and the Soviet Union controlled religion — not by banning it outright, but by turning churches into tools of the state.

In China, Protestant churches were absorbed into the government-run Three-Self Patriotic Movement (TSPM), while Catholics fell under a similar state-controlled body. These churches had to submit to the authority of the Communist Party.

Crosses were taken down, sermons were censored or vetted to promote socialist ideas, and pastors had to pledge loyalty to the state. Evangelism and any talk that challenged the Party were banned. Churches often displayed portraits of Communist leaders alongside religious symbols. Meanwhile, underground “house churches” that refused to cooperate were labelled illegal, faced persecution, and were forced to meet in secret. Indeed, some of these practices persist today.

Likewise, in the Soviet Union, churches that resisted state control were harassed, infiltrated, or shut down. Registered churches like the Moscow Patriarchate operated under government surveillance, with clergy often pressured to inform on their congregations.

Public Christian teaching and evangelism were outlawed, and believers who worshipped outside official channels did so under threat of harsh punishment. Faithful pastors were imprisoned or executed, and religious education was banned, leaving believers to gather in hidden places like basements or forests.

In both China and the USSR, perhaps the greatest tragedy was not the persecution itself, but the compromise of Christians and church leaders who chose survival over faithfulness. Some believed they were being “wise as serpents,” adapting to keep their churches open. In truth, they unwittingly became tools of the regime, sacrificing truth to the demands of political power.

These Christians managed to avoid the immediate threat of gulags and secret police, but they still fell victim to “soft totalitarianism” — a chokehold on their witness enforced by shame, cancellation, and a loss of social standing. Their Christianity wasn’t eradicated but it was domesticated, which was exactly what the regime wanted: a church that posed no threat and politely echoed the culture.

Today’s “woke” movement operates much the same way. Rather than starting with overt state control, cultural elites enforce conformity through social pressure and institutional power. Instead of party loyalty, they demand virtue signalling and performative solidarity. And like the Communist regimes before them, they seek not to destroy the church, but to co-opt and neutralise it — turning the gospel into an echo of their own ideology.

The Marxist Roots of Woke Ideology

At first glance, wokeness appears to be a very modern moral shift, but it has old roots. In fact, it grew from the same tree that produced both Russian and Chinese Communism. Indeed, woke ideology might best be described as Western Marxism.

When Karl Marx urged the masses to “seize the means of production,” he didn’t just have factories and farmland in mind. He hoped to reshape humanity itself. He believed capitalism alienated man from his true nature as a social being. Communism, in Marx’s view, would not just redistribute wealth, but redeem mankind by reclaiming his identity and completing history.

Marx saw history as an enduring struggle between oppressors and the oppressed. He believed that key social institutions — like religion, family, and private property — were tools used by those in power to keep others down. Marx’s vision was revolutionary, materialistic, and atheistic. He hoped to overthrow these structures and create a new society.

While classical Marxism focused mainly on economics and class struggle, 20th-century Marxists of the Frankfurt School — such as Herbert Marcuse and Antonio Gramsci — realised Communism could only overtake the West if it first undermined the key institutions of Western culture.

They saw that violent revolution had failed, and if utopia would be achieved, it could only come about through subtler means — by changing the way people think and the values they hold. They believed it was necessary to take control of key cultural institutions — education, religion, family, media, and law — and reshape them from within.

Thus, the battleground shifted from class to identity. Categories like race, gender and sexuality became central. Victimhood became a source of moral authority. Crucially, justice was redefined as the breaking down of all traditional norms associated with Western and Christian values.

The terms “Cultural Marxism” and “critical theory” are often used to describe this phenomenon, but more accurately, it is simply Western Marxism — Karl Marx’s utopian vision applied in a Western context.

Today, this new belief structure shapes much of the West’s moral outlook. And its greatest danger lies in how it enters the church — not with open hostility, but cloaked in familiar Christian language. Terms like “love,” “compassion” and “justice” are borrowed to disguise an entirely different message to the one found in Scripture. Instead of pointing to Christ’s redemption, wokeness requires the church to accept a new gospel focused on social activism and cultural conformity.

Just as Communist regimes once pressured churches to conform to state ideology, today’s churches face pressure to adopt woke dogma, or risk being labeled intolerant, irrelevant — even dangerous.

Recognising the Marxist lineage of wokeness is essential for Christians who want to stand firm in the truth. So is learning its many clever disguises.

Woke Christianity: A Counterfeit Gospel

Wokeness doesn’t confront Christianity head-on by rejecting it. Instead, it subtly edits what Christianity means. In this new framework, sin is no longer personal disobedience but “systemic injustice”. Salvation isn’t about forgiveness and new life in Christ — it’s social liberation through cultural revolution. Repentance becomes a call to confess one’s “privilege”. Sanctification turns into a lifelong journey of acquiesce to certain identity groups.

The biblical gospel is not denied outright — it is quietly replaced.

Core Christian teachings on marriage, sexuality, the sanctity of life, and the unique lordship of Christ are quietly reframed as tools of oppression. Scripture is read through the lens of power and identity politics. Jesus himself is recast — not as the Saviour who rescues us from sin, but as a revolutionary figure who upturned society’s hierarchies.

Many churches, eager to avoid being labeled bigoted or out-of-touch, begin to echo this language. Sermons shift focus from calling sinners to repentance and upholding biblical values toward calls for social advocacy. Pastors often trade the full counsel of God for safe, politically correct messages. Compassion is used to silence uncomfortable truths. And the biblical concept of justice is replaced by worldly ideas like equity and redistribution.

This pattern is not new. Under Communist regimes, churches were allowed to operate but only under strict state control. They could preach spiritual matters but had to avoid any moral or political challenges to the regime. The result was a neutered church — a shadow of its true calling, serving propaganda instead of truth.

Woke Christianity waltzes headlong into the same trap — not under an iron-fisted regime (at least not yet), but under the velvet-gloved tyranny of Western cultural elites, who wield shame, cancellation and exclusion as tools of control.

Woke Christianity: A New Orthodoxy

What many Christians are yet to reckon with is this: wokeness is not merely a political movement — it is a rival religion. It offers its own theology, moral law, sacred texts, sacraments, and eschatological vision. It has its own blasphemy codes, inquisitors and high priests.

Most dangerously, wokeness does not seek peaceful coexistence with Christianity. It aims to replace the church by hollowing Christianity out and wearing it as a skin suit.

This new faith has no god, but it upholds a powerful moral vision of salvation and judgment. It divides the world into two castes: the oppressed and the oppressors. It demands rituals of penance, confession and purification. It replaces objective truth with moral narrative, and casts aside evidence for ideological allegiance. And like all religions, it defines what is sacred, what is profane, and who has the right to speak.

These parallels to formal religion are not accidental. Wokeness borrows the form of faith while replacing its substance. The contours of this new orthodoxy can be traced clearly across a wide range of domains — race, gender, climate, capitalism, colonialism, and more. Consider just three of these domains, as presented in chart form by independent journalist Michael Shellenberger and philosopher Peter Boghossian:

Under the banner of race, for instance, slavery and white supremacy are the original sins. White people are the damned, BLM leaders and race activists are the elect, and black and brown bodies are sacred victims. Kneeling, reparations, and racial training serve as rituals of purification, while taboo facts — like declining racism and Asian success — are treated as heresy.

In climate activism, fossil fuels are sinful, oil companies and sceptics are the devils, and figures like Greta Thunberg form the elect. Recycling, protesting, and advocating for Net Zero are the rituals, while dissent — such as supporting nuclear power or praising wealth and growth — is taboo.

Meanwhile, under trans ideology, the gender binary is the original sin. Critics of gender fluidity are the guilty, and trans activists are the priesthood. Public rituals include pronoun declarations and gender-affirming care, while the stories of detransitioners or facts about mental health outcomes for those who transition are taboo.

Feminism, decolonisation, anti-capitalism and queer theory all follow the same pattern. Each have sacred victims, moral elites, purifying speech, and harsh penalties for dissent. Though the specifics differ, the structure is unmistakably religious, intolerant of rival creeds, and firmly grounded in Marxism.

Unlike Christianity — which begins with the truth that all have sinned but can be redeemed by God’s grace — this new religion offers no forgiveness. Your identity either condemns you or places you among the elect. The only path to salvation is through endless performance and ideological conformity. Wokeness demands allegiance but offers no atonement. It imposes guilt and withholds grace. It promises justice but delivers condemnation.

Under wokeness, we see the same impulse that led totalitarian regimes to create state-sanctioned churches. In the Soviet Union, Christian liturgies were rewritten in Marxist terms. In China still today, sermons must align with Party doctrine. And in the West, churches are now pressured to baptise woke slogans in Christian language. But this new faith is not compatible with the gospel. It is a false religion — one that seeks not to renew the world, but to remake it in its own image.

The Four Stages of Censorship in the West

In their quest for dominance, Western Marxists have targeted the principle freedom of Western democracies: freedom of speech.

The steady erosion of free speech in the West has followed a clear and chilling trajectory — not through violent revolution, but by gradual cultural, institutional and legal capture. What began as politeness is rapidly morphing into prosecution. The process has unfolded in four overlapping stages, each building on the last:

Stage 1: Political Correctness (1990s–2010s). Social norms were reshaped through informal pressure. Universities, HR departments and media outlets adopted PC language in line with progressive values on race, gender, and sexuality. Dissent was not illegal — but it came at a reputational cost. The boundaries of acceptable opinion quietly narrowed.

Stage 2: Cancel Culture (2014–2020). Crowdsourced enforcement emerged. Social media mobs targeted individuals for ideological infractions — real or perceived, past or present. Institutions capitulated swiftly, firing employees, dropping clients, and deplatforming controversial figures. The cost of dissent became economic and professional.

Stage 3: DEI Institutionalisation (2020–present). After 2020, ideological conformity became formal policy. Under the banner of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), organisations adopted mandatory trainings, pronoun rules and hiring quotas. Disagreement wasn’t just impolite — it was framed as “harm”. Compliance became a condition of employment and career advancement.

Stage 4: Misinformation Legislation (2022–present). The final shift is legal codification. Cloaked in vague terms like “hate”, “harm”, and “disinformation”, Western governments — most notably in Canada, the UK, and Ireland — have enacted laws that criminalise certain viewpoints. Australia made a similar attempt and will likely try again. These laws grant sweeping powers to suppress dissent, often without clear definitions or due process — a feature, not a flaw.

Together, these four stages chart a movement from culture to code to coercion. Each step may seem justified in isolation. But taken together, they reveal a relentless Marxist march toward ideological control, where truth and conscience are subordinated to the new orthodoxy.

In short, free speech is no longer under threat from fringe activists. It is being redefined by law.

Resisting Ideological Captivity

So how should Christians respond?

1. Recover Biblical Discernment. We must test every spirit, every slogan and every sermon against the full counsel of God’s Word (1 John 4:1). Not every cause that sounds moral is actually righteous. Some of the most dangerous lies wear the language of virtue. Discernment is not optional — it is a matter of spiritual survival.

2. Reject False Unity. The unity Christ prayed for in John 17 is unity in truth, not a fragile coexistence built on compromise. We are not called to conform to the world but to be transformed by the renewing of our minds (Romans 12:2). Real unity cannot be built on silence, ambiguity or the path of least resistance.

3. Speak the Truth in Love. Love without truth is little more than sentimentality. Likewise, truth without love can be brutal. But silence in the face of deception is neither — it is cowardice. We are called to proclaim the truth of God boldly and graciously, with clarity, compassion, and courage (Ephesians 4:15).

4. Strengthen the Remnant. In every age of compromise, God preserves a remnant. We must invest in churches, leaders, and ministries that stand firm — those actively refusing to bow to the idols of our age. History attests that these are the torchbearers who will carry the gospel of Christ into the next generation.

5. Be Prepared to Suffer. Faithfulness will cost us. We will pay a price in social standing, careers, friendships — perhaps even our freedom. But we follow a crucified Lord who told us to take up our cross daily (Luke 9:23). Our concern must not be preserving comfort or influence — but guarding the truth, whatever the cost.

6. Cultivate a Robust Worldview. We must equip ourselves and the next generation with a biblical worldview that can withstand cultural pressure. This means understanding not just what we believe, but why — so we can engage the world faithfully without being conformed to it.

A Church at the Crossroads

The church in the West stands at a defining crossroads.

Will we baptise the lies of our age in Christian language, dressing ideological conformity in the robes of righteousness — just as many churches did under Communist regimes?

Or will we stand firm? Will we speak the truth, suffer faithfully, and proclaim Christ without compromise?

The gospel does not call us to relevance but to repentance; not to safety, but to sacrifice; not to comfort, but to the cross.

Don’t be deceived: the world does not need a church that mirrors its ideologies. It needs a church that shines the light of Jesus in the gathering darkness.

As Joshua declared to a wavering Israel, so we must declare today: “Choose this day whom you will serve” (Joshua 24:15). The choice is before us. Cultural acceptance or Christ; compromise or conviction; silence or truth.

May we choose Christ and reject the counterfeit gospel. And may we live not by lies — but by the truth that sets us free.

___

Image courtesy of Pexels.