
Variety’s Latest Honour Proves Categories Are Real… Until They’re Inconvenient
Variety Magazine has announced the recipient of their 2026 Women of Power award.
And the award goes to…
You think you already know the punchline, don’t you?
These days, the winner of a women’s award is likely to go to… someone not a woman. It’s all so predictable.
But Variety Magazine has seen fit to add a twist this year.
Outside the Binary Box
They’ve given their Women of Power award to actress Emma Corrin… a woman… who says she’s not a woman. Or a man.
She enthusiastically accepted the award, telling those gathered:
I’m doubly honoured to be here tonight as the first non-binary recipient of the award. I think it’s crucial now more than ever that no matter how we identify, we are able to come together and support each other.
Actor Person Emma Corrin insists on being called they/them rather than she/her because they is non-binary.
So we are, apparently, dealing with a woman who is not a woman, receiving an award for women, in celebration of a category she does not belong to, but is also honoured to represent.
It makes perfect sense if you say it while standing on your head. Or if you’re the Australian Sex Discrimination Commissioner. But I repeat myself.
Confusing Contortions
Here’s what I find so difficult to understand…
If you or I use the wrong pronouns in relation to a gender diverse person, it’s tantamount to committing a genocide.
And yet, if that same person decides that, for the purposes of a trophy ceremony, a red carpet, and much-needed publicity for an upcoming film, they are perfectly comfortable stepping temporarily into the category of “woman” in order to accept a Women’s award, then suddenly we are expected to be nothing but gracious, celebratory, and inclusive.
No contradiction is acknowledged. No irony is permitted. Just a gentle injunction that we all “come together and support each other.”
Which is, of course, the modern moral ecosystem in miniature: the rules are absolute, unless you need a loophole; the categories are sacred, unless they are inconvenient; and consistency is not so much a virtue as a kind of microaggression.
And so we are left with a world in which language is treated as both dangerously rigid and infinitely elastic, depending entirely on who is speaking, what they are receiving, and which direction the applause is coming from.
___
Republished with thanks to The James Macpherson Report. Images courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
12 October 2026
4.6 MINS
Learn how journalists use loaded language, selective quotes and misleading headlines to shape public opinion, using a controversial report about James and Joanna Howe as a case study.
12 October 2026
3.1 MINS
The proposed livestream of Nidal Hasan’s execution has reignited debate over justice, deterrence and public accountability, with critics comparing American justice to ISIS propaganda.
12 October 2026
3.7 MINS
An EU court case over baptismal records could pit data protection laws against religious freedom, raising serious questions about whether governments can compel churches to erase sacramental history.
12 October 2026
3.2 MINS
Your support has helped us change the world for the better, as Dads4Kids has poured our heart, soul and finance into the global promotion and celebration of International Men’s Day.
9 October 2026
1.8 MINS
Pen Power Australia has been busy confronting antisemitism and double standards, lodging letters, pursuing accountability and celebrating several important wins along the way.
9 October 2026
3.3 MINS
New South Wales healthcare workers who object to abortion and voluntary assisted dying face growing pressure, raising serious questions about conscience rights, employment and moral injury.
8 October 2026
3.6 MINS
John Anderson warns that Australia’s decline is rooted in spiritual and cultural disintegration, calling for a recovery of Christian foundations, social cohesion and national purpose.






Brilliantly observed James.