Australia’s Largest Christian News Site

Chris Uhlmann and former Deputy PM John Anderson lay bare the brutal reality of net zero – it will impoverish the nation, destroy industries, and leave young people with a diminished future. But no one in power will admit it.

On Saturday, 31 May 2025, the governing body of the South Australian Liberal Party passed a motion calling on the Federal Parliamentary team to discontinue the pursuit of Net Zero by 2050. It made quite an impact in the media.

The Liberal Party has been losing ground to Labor for years, struggling against a one-party state machine that locks in left-wing control.

Spain’s renewables PowerGrid went from net zero to net nothing on Monday, 28 April. An atmospheric disturbance on an unstable grid is likely the cause. Will Australia learn the lesson?

With rising debt and vague promises, both Labor and the Coalition are sidestepping hard reforms as global threats grow.

Australia is yet again approaching an election in which neither party leader, or party, is particularly popular. Whoever wins will be little more than, in the eyes of Australians, the leper with the most fingers. Australia tends not to elect heroes; it elects managers.

In a few weeks’ time after the federal election, we will either have some sort of conservative government in, with all its faults, but with at least some really good MPs among them, or we will have a Greens-Labor government in, further destroying what is left of Australia.

My journey to be the lead South Australian Senate Candidate for Family First starts at our family breakfast table. We would come home after church, have breakfast and have spirited arguments about political issues.

Every species can be threatened by disease. The bureaucratic instinct is to kill every member in any threatened herd to ensure all sick ones die. But there are major flaws in this scorched earth policy that threaten animal and human flourishing.

Is climate change a catastrophe or is it a problem demanding a solution; is "Net Zero" the only answer; are renewables – like wind and solar – so reliable, clean, cheap, and secure; and if renewables are so cheap, why the heck is my power bill flying to the moon?

The net zero carbon push to combat “climate change” – a conveniently vague term – involves eye-watering amounts of notional capital. The biggest banks and management funds are starting to walk away.

With the federal election looming, the already heated debate over Australia’s energy future is set to intensify. Both parties’ energy models are seriously flawed. But when we fix those flaws, nuclear comes out cheaper than renewables.

Albo took five days to get to the synagogue fire, but was at the Grampians faster than you could say "Climate Change".

The Australian economy is tanking. A large part of the cause is government spending, and yet Labor treasurer Jim Chalmers believes all is well. Rather than motivate businesses to build growth, Labor has chosen to further bloat the bureaucracy instead.

Australians are already feeling the cost of the "renewable" transition, but there are far higher costs to come, according to Chris Uhlmann's new documentary "The Real Cost of Net Zero".

From social media bans to Australia Day boycotts, our world seems to be losing any sense.

In a cost-of-living crisis, with Australians facing higher bills, growing debt, and an energy system at risk of instability, Albanese and Labor are making life worse for all of us. Labor's plan relies on a carbon price to justify their renewables-only approach.

According to journalist Chris Uhlmann in his new one-hour-long documentary "The Real Cost of Net Zero: The shocking truth of the renewable energy push", renewable energy sounds good in theory, but the reality is vastly different.

We are living in an age of disruption. Joe Rogan is now one of the biggest media personalities in the world, and Donald Trump looks almost certain to win a second term as President of the United States. Here are my top ten highlights of their extensive exchange.

While Vance was the clear victor in this debate, the question arises as to how much of an impact it will have in next month’s election.