Net Zero Solar Panel

The Big Lie Unmasked: Why Net Zero is Based on Net Zero Truth

1 July 2025

3.2 MINS

Australia’s obsession with “net zero” is one of the most destructive political delusions of our time.

In a compelling conversation between veteran journalist Chris Uhlmann and former Deputy Prime Minister John Anderson, the brutal reality of net zero is laid bare — and it’s a wake-up call for the nation.

It’s an alarm Family First has been sounding for years.

But when two eminent Australians apply their experience and knowledge to the debate, more people, especially Coalition politicians, should take note.

Net Zero, a False Religion

Net zero has become a kind of civic religion, enforced by political elites, media operatives and corporate interests.

“We’ve signed up to a faith,” Uhlmann warns. “Our ruling class, our elites… the media class… a large proportion of it has signed up to this faith as well.”

This is not science — it’s dogma. And as Anderson says, it’s “self-flagellation without hope and without mercy.”

The truth is, renewables can’t do the job. Wind and solar aren’t “generators,” Uhlmann argues, but “energy gatherers… like throwing a net into the ocean.”

They are intermittent, heavily subsidised, and need fossil-fuel backup. The more you build, the less stable and more expensive the system becomes.

“It makes a less reliable system and it makes a more expensive system,” he says.

South Australia — with the highest proportion of renewables — also has the highest electricity prices in the nation.

This is not just bad economics — it’s intergenerational theft.

“People have to understand that if they want the lifestyle that they’re living now, which is essentially borrowed money, that money… has to be paid for — and that’s by future generations,” Uhlmann says.

And he is right — young Australians are being saddled with the cost of an energy transition that cannot work.

Dishonest Political Class

Uhlmann and Anderson are deeply critical of the political class for failing to be honest with the public about the true cost and consequences of net zero.

Uhlmann makes the central accusation bluntly: “If we are going to make this transition, then the one thing that we could demand of all of our leaders is simply this: tell the truth. What is the cost going to be?”

He accuses politicians of knowingly misleading Australians, citing the $275 energy bill reduction promised by Labor during the 2022 election.

Uhlmann also recounts private conversations with industry leaders and government officials who admit the policy is unworkable but won’t say so publicly: “I’ve had the same conversations with people who run electricity retailers… who know that we’re on the wrong path, but all want to sign up for a target like net zero because they feel that their shareholders want it or that the public wants it.”

This dishonesty, they argue, is corroding trust in democracy.

“There is no greater issue confronting this nation now than the breakdown of trust,” Anderson warns.

“If we’re not going to trust because we don’t think [leaders are] trustworthy… we’re not going to be able to come to grips with the challenges that are before us.”

Net Zero Will Destroy Australia

In short, Uhlmann and Anderson argue that Australians are being sold a lie — that net zero can be achieved cheaply, painlessly, and without serious disruption.

In reality, they say, it will impoverish the nation, destroy industries, and leave young people with a diminished future — and no one in power is willing to admit it.

“Climate change is a problem,” Uhlmann says, “but it is not an existential threat.”

The real threat is the collapse of our energy and economic systems.

“Energy is life… and energy is the economy,” he says plainly.

“We are creatures of fire,” and without energy-dense fuels like coal, oil and gas, we can’t power farms, factories, hospitals, or homes — let alone data centres and defence systems.

Hiding the Real Cost of Net Zero with Subsidies

Net zero is also dangerously dishonest. The government is hiding the true cost by using taxpayer money to suppress power bills.

“There’s this giant Ponzi scheme,” Uhlmann says, “where we’re taking money from taxpayers and then recycling it back into the bills of consumers and calling that cost-of-living relief.”

When the subsidies end, the pain will hit hard — and it will hit the poor the hardest, he says.

Worst of all, this is all for nothing.

“Economies which now make up 60% of the world’s carbon emissions… have no intention of hitting net zero.”

What Australia does is irrelevant to the climate but devastating to our economy.

As Anderson puts it: “We are being asked to wear an incredible cost of mitigation… and then have to pay the price of adaptation anyway.”

Family First is calling for both major parties — especially the Coalition — to walk away from net zero before it’s too late.

“If we continue on this path,” Uhlmann warns, “we will not be able to manufacture anything in Australia.”

That’s a future of decline, darkness, and dependence.

It’s time to return to reality.

___

Originally published at Family First. Image via Adobe.

We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.

Fake news and censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate now.

4 Comments

  1. e8efab73e9035f385ce879e3343f5abf477d6ee73e172987eab20c74791dafa9?s=54&d=mm&r=g
    David Hallett 1 July 2025 at 8:46 am - Reply

    Good article. There is also another reason that net zero, if achieved, will have a destructive effect on the planet. Net zero policy is directed at reducing so called greenhouse emissions of which carbon dioxide is considered a prime enemy to the religious climate change zealots. Carbon dioxide is an essential plant food and increases of this are needed to increase the greening of the planet to provide increased food production for an increasing population and to provide increased production of oxygen. This stimulus is part of a natural order which ensures that world climate meets the needs of people. Attempts to break this natural order in the name of a net zero religion, if successful, will probably result in future widespread food shortages. I am grimly amused at the so-called Greens, who are leading the net zero nonsense, for there advocacy in pushing a programme that directly inhibits the increased greening of the planet that is now needed. More rightly they should be called the Brown Party.

  2. 88895edd636b06243f9fd428bd489df187815eaea5fa354be4a52463f62a2932?s=54&d=mm&r=g
    gail Petherick 1 July 2025 at 12:24 pm - Reply

    Thank you for the article Lyle. Its summarises everything so well and rings all alarm bells. It exposes the deceit of this Net zero policy and some of the aims behind it too.
    That statement by Uhlman says in a nutshell what has happened: “We’ve signed up to a faith,” …. “Our ruling class, our elites… the media class… a large proportion of it has signed up to this faith as well.”

    Then the thunderbolt at the end : If we continue on this path,” Uhlmann warns, “we will not be able to manufacture anything in Australia.” That’s a future of decline, darkness, and dependence….It’s time to return to reality.

  3. 88895edd636b06243f9fd428bd489df187815eaea5fa354be4a52463f62a2932?s=54&d=mm&r=g
    Gail Petherick 1 July 2025 at 12:28 pm - Reply

    Thank you for standing for Family First for standing for truth, to warn Australians of what is happening with teh agenda behind ‘Net zero’. The young generation have only been taught to panic and to blame a system that was in some sense working and also it means we could have our own industries to build cars and and even ships and defence needs were manufactured here.
    This generation through the media hype and all the misinformation have been taught to react and go for zero emissions without doing the research on it….
    Few are admitting that the turbine windmills attract birds that lose their radar ability, and as aresult birds fly into them and are killed.
    Few mention that wind turbines are made of fibreglass which means when they designate or a wing falls off, the part doesn’t disappear but instead poisons the earth below and when grass grows in t he area partials get into the grass, and hence a cow or cattle can eat contaminated soil via the grass and we can drink contaminated milk. The rivers also cannot deal with toxins from the fiberglass materials.
    These facts are hidden and everyone is told instead that the windmills create free energy and are harmless…no one mentions the unfriendly/deadly materials they are made of and that already one wind farm was closed due to parts falling off demonstrating lack of durablity -little was said though about poisoning the soil .
    May many youth read yoru article and many learn the other side of the story and realsie Australia has been sold a lie. (Satan is the father of lies and a destroyer) May we pray through and ask God to turn this around.

  4. f910f8648b50864a0a4fa9cff6838335a9df65757870ba46526d3fd0fd4d5768?s=54&d=mm&r=g
    Ian Moncrieff 2 July 2025 at 9:44 pm - Reply

    It is obvious from the science that “If we continue on this path,” we will not be able to manufacture anything in Australia.”

    That’s a future of decline, darkness, and dependence.

    It’s time to return to reality.

Leave A Comment

Recent Articles:

Use your voice today to protect

Faith · Family · Freedom · Life

MOST POPULAR

ABOUT

The Daily Declaration is an Australian Christian news site dedicated to providing a voice for Christian values in the public square. Our vision is to see the revitalisation of our Judeo-Christian values for the common good. We are non-profit, independent, crowdfunded, and provide Christian news for a growing audience across Australia, Asia, and the South Pacific. The opinions of our contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of The Daily Declaration. Read More.

MOST COMMENTS

GOOD NEWS

HALL OF FAME

BROWSE TOPICS

BROWSE GENRES