
The Gender Ideologues Identify as Progressive, But This is Not Progress
Apparently, strong women like Queen Elizabeth I who claimed masculine traits, surely could not have been women. At most, they must have been non-binary. Thus goes the trans narrative of historical revisionism, in desperate efforts to find their genderqueer reflection in ages past.
I’m old enough to remember when girls were allowed to reject stereotypes and just be themselves.
If girls wanted to wear frilly dresses and become ballerinas, that was fine. And if they wanted to wear overalls and work on car engines, that was good too.
But thanks to the regressive Left, those carefree days of women’s liberation are long gone.
Postmodern Sexism
These days, if a female behaves like a boy might be expected to behave, it is assumed that she is in fact a boy, trapped in a female body.
Quickly. Fetch the puberty blockers and bind that chest. We need to rescue the bloke from the female anatomy cruelly trying to swallow him whole
This was never more apparent than last week when a British academic made headlines claiming that Queen Elizabeth I was non-binary and that, if alive today, she would have used the pronouns they/them.
Trans-awareness trainer (yes, that’s a thing in 2022) Dr Kit Heyam claimed that Elizabeth’s famous speech to rally her troops against the Spanish Armada provided evidence she was non-binary.
Over-Literal
Queen Elizabeth I is reported to have said:
‘I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble woman; but I have the heart and stomach of a king, and of a king of England too.’
Dr Heyam, who has never heard of a metaphor, said living in a world where military leaders were almost always male would have had a profound impact on Elizabeth I and caused her to be identified as non-binary.
On the other hand, this could just be a case of an academic making stuff up.
While it’s debatable whether the Virgin Queen was non-binary, we can be fairly certain she would have rounded up all the trans awareness trainers plying their trade in the 1500s and sent them to the Tower.
Regressive
We should, however, thank Dr Heyam for demonstrating the inherent gender conservatism in the new gender identity ideology.
Essentially Dr Heyam would have us believe that people who do ‘manly’ things must be men and people who do ‘womanly’ things must be women.
This is why, along with Elizabeth I, the French heroine Joan of Arc was also categorised as non-binary by a new Globe Theatre production.
Are you understanding the woke gender ideology now? All the strong women of the past were mostly guys.
Get women out of the history books and back into the history kitchens where they belong!
The left cannot help themselves. They just keep erasing women.
Men deciding strong women aren’t feminine enough to be called women is peak misogyny.
We have gone from women being barred from positions in the public arena to now insisting that women successful in the public arena must actually be men trapped in women’s bodies.
Gender ideologues may identify as progressive, but this is not progress.
___
Originally published at The James Macpherson Report.
Subscribe to his Substack here for daily witty commentary.
The Armada Portrait of Elizabeth I of England / Wikimedia Commons.
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
4 November 2026
3.7 MINS
Victoria’s Labor Government has written off a $6 million loan to rescue the financially struggling Pride Centre, leaving taxpayers to foot the bill for another government-funded bailout.
4 November 2026
7.4 MINS
Christianity Today faces mounting criticism for suggesting Elisabeth Elliot was bisexual, despite admitting there is insufficient evidence. The controversy exposes deeper questions about the magazine’s evangelical identity.
2 November 2026
1.6 MINS
If “love is love”, as we were told during the same-sex marriage campaign, then why would a paedophile's attraction towards children be any different? That’s where the Albanese Government has come to, and it’s pure evil.
29 October 2026
2.7 MINS
If passed, the Digital Duty of Care Bill 2026 will almost certainly lead to censorship of Bible-based convictions about marriage, abortion, gender, Islam and more. Here's why it should be rejected and how to make a submission by 30 October.
29 October 2026
2.7 MINS
A Senate hearing on breastfeeding protections raises questions about sex discrimination law, induced lactation and why the Human Rights Commission paid a consultant to prepare its answers.
27 October 2026
10.3 MINS
As Tasmania and Western Australia consider conversion therapy bans, a former LGBT+ ministry leader warns of threats to religious freedom, personal choice and Christian discipleship.
26 October 2026
2.9 MINS
A powerful display of thousands of shoes highlights Australia’s escalating male suicide crisis, while Dads4Kids celebrates fatherhood, family connections and practical action to strengthen generations.






Totally nailed it! They are in fact denigrating women completely.