
Elon Musk Scrapped Twitter’s Ban on ‘Misgendering or Deadnaming’
A step forward for free speech.
Twitter moved one step closer towards its mandate as a platform for free expression this month, after the little blue bird removed prohibitions on “misgendering or deadnaming” from its hateful conduct policy.
The change was not announced but made quietly, and was subsequently noticed by online sleuths before being reported by NBC News. The original policy is still visible via Wayback Machine.
Prior to Elon Musk, Twitter had enforced the anti-free speech provision for five long years, under the subheading “slurs and tropes”. Users were deamplified and even deplatformed for using the name given at birth to a person who now identifies as transgender, or their gender pronouns that correspond with, you know, the facts of nature.
As noted by Not the Bee, the policy update “puts Twitter out of step with other social media companies that enforce insane policies and compel false speech, but it puts Twitter back in step with reality”.
The activist-journalist who penned the NBC News critique huffed that “Twitter responded to a request for comment with the Pile of Poo emoji, an automated message it now sends as a reply to all media requests.” In response to the media’s blanket negativity towards Musk’s takeover of Twitter, the new CEO initiated and humorously announced the auto-reply rollout last month:
press@twitter.com now auto responds with 💩
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 19, 2023
Backlash from the wokerati was as predictable as it was dishonest.
CEO of the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) Sarah Kate Ellis claimed that the policy update “is the latest example of just how unsafe the company is for users and advertisers alike”.
Twitter’s decision to covertly roll back its longtime policy is the latest example of just how unsafe the company is for users and advertisers alike. https://t.co/ChR1aQRf95
— Sarah Kate Ellis (@sarahkateellis) April 18, 2023
“Unsafe” is, of course, a euphemism for hurt feelings — though Ellis failed to clarify how exactly advertisers would have their feelings endangered as a result of the policy change.
Ellis went on to claim that Musk’s Twitter now plays host to a “barrage of disinformation and hate about trans people from right wing media personalities, politicians, and the extremists they bolster”.
Her words echoed those of BBC reporter James Clayton, who lived to regret an interview he recently conducted with Elon Musk on the same topic. Initially, Clayton told Musk he has seen a rise in hate speech on Twitter since the takeover, but under further interrogation from Musk, he failed to provide a single example and was forced to change topics:
The irony is James Clayton now has hundreds of examples of hate speech to choose from. Unfortunately they’re all about his disingenuous, car crash interview.pic.twitter.com/zxeNxcRNCw
— Nick Dixon (@nickdixoncomic) April 13, 2023
Another wokester to condemn Twitter’s policy update was Nora Benavidez, Senior Counsel and Director at Free Press. She tweeted:
Today, @glaad has just broke the news that @Twitter surreptitiously removed one sentence in its Hateful Content Policy which had previously protected users against deadnaming and misgendering. Every decision Musk makes is bad for free speech, safety, business. #StopToxicTwitter https://t.co/Blt3EaF9L3
— Nora Benavidez (@AttorneyNora) April 18, 2023
See how it works? Allowing people to speak more freely is “bad for free speech”. Real free speech means forcing people to utter words and phrases that contradict reality and that they themselves don’t even believe.
Orwell, eat your heart out.
Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon had some wise words to say about the saga:
This is an overdue and important update. The old policy treated factually accurate statements as enforceable policy violations. It didn’t merely prohibit harassment; it blocked truth. Gender ideology should be debated, not imposed by force — especially on a “platform for free… https://t.co/yzyEQrogKK
— Seth Dillon (@SethDillon) April 19, 2023
He added, “The idea that trans-identifying people can’t handle even the slightest pushback is horribly condescending. If they respected themselves, they’d be fighting against policies predicated on their fragility.”
Failing that, perhaps they could log off of Twitter and get some fresh air.
___
Originally published at MercatorNet. Photo by John Cameron on Unsplash.
Recent Articles:
17 September 2026
5.2 MINS
Surrogacy is often discussed through the hopes of adults seeking children. Meet the woman, born to a surrogate herself, who says the debate should begin instead with the experiences of surrogate mothers and children separated at birth.
17 September 2026
2.8 MINS
"A good mom if you strangle your kids — but lose custody for protecting your daughter from being castrated and mutilated by the gender lobby." That's Massachusetts today, where a Catholic couple lost their teenage girl for refusing to affirm her transgender identity.
17 September 2026
5.7 MINS
The Federal Labor Government is proposing to expand assisted suicide via telehealth — a choice to die over a video call, without a doctor ever being in the room. That's not compassion. That's the state deciding your life isn't worth the cost of a face-to-face visit.
16 September 2026
4.7 MINS
Sall Grover is leaving Australia, but not the fight. Following the High Court's refusal to hear her appeal in Giggle v. Tickle, Grover declared she will not call a man a woman — whatever the law says. She won't stop fighting until the law changes.
16 September 2026
6.7 MINS
When Dr Paul Tyson hand-delivered a letter opposing the Digital Duty of Care bill to his local MP's office, he expected a brief exchange. Instead, he left feeling patronised, unheard, and more alarmed than ever.
16 September 2026
3.2 MINS
Before it was ‘Dignity in Dying’, the euthanasia lobby was founded by a medical eugenicist who called the sick a “useless burden”. That dark history didn't disappear — it was just rebranded.
16 September 2026
2.2 MINS
Thirty-seven years after the Berlin Wall fell, socialism is gaining popularity among Americans with no memory of life behind the Iron Curtain. History, however, tells a very different story.





