
Elon Musk Scrapped Twitter’s Ban on ‘Misgendering or Deadnaming’
A step forward for free speech.
Twitter moved one step closer towards its mandate as a platform for free expression this month, after the little blue bird removed prohibitions on “misgendering or deadnaming” from its hateful conduct policy.
The change was not announced but made quietly, and was subsequently noticed by online sleuths before being reported by NBC News. The original policy is still visible via Wayback Machine.
Prior to Elon Musk, Twitter had enforced the anti-free speech provision for five long years, under the subheading “slurs and tropes”. Users were deamplified and even deplatformed for using the name given at birth to a person who now identifies as transgender, or their gender pronouns that correspond with, you know, the facts of nature.
As noted by Not the Bee, the policy update “puts Twitter out of step with other social media companies that enforce insane policies and compel false speech, but it puts Twitter back in step with reality”.
The activist-journalist who penned the NBC News critique huffed that “Twitter responded to a request for comment with the Pile of Poo emoji, an automated message it now sends as a reply to all media requests.” In response to the media’s blanket negativity towards Musk’s takeover of Twitter, the new CEO initiated and humorously announced the auto-reply rollout last month:
press@twitter.com now auto responds with 💩
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 19, 2023
Backlash from the wokerati was as predictable as it was dishonest.
CEO of the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) Sarah Kate Ellis claimed that the policy update “is the latest example of just how unsafe the company is for users and advertisers alike”.
Twitter’s decision to covertly roll back its longtime policy is the latest example of just how unsafe the company is for users and advertisers alike. https://t.co/ChR1aQRf95
— Sarah Kate Ellis (@sarahkateellis) April 18, 2023
“Unsafe” is, of course, a euphemism for hurt feelings — though Ellis failed to clarify how exactly advertisers would have their feelings endangered as a result of the policy change.
Ellis went on to claim that Musk’s Twitter now plays host to a “barrage of disinformation and hate about trans people from right wing media personalities, politicians, and the extremists they bolster”.
Her words echoed those of BBC reporter James Clayton, who lived to regret an interview he recently conducted with Elon Musk on the same topic. Initially, Clayton told Musk he has seen a rise in hate speech on Twitter since the takeover, but under further interrogation from Musk, he failed to provide a single example and was forced to change topics:
The irony is James Clayton now has hundreds of examples of hate speech to choose from. Unfortunately they’re all about his disingenuous, car crash interview.pic.twitter.com/zxeNxcRNCw
— Nick Dixon (@nickdixoncomic) April 13, 2023
Another wokester to condemn Twitter’s policy update was Nora Benavidez, Senior Counsel and Director at Free Press. She tweeted:
Today, @glaad has just broke the news that @Twitter surreptitiously removed one sentence in its Hateful Content Policy which had previously protected users against deadnaming and misgendering. Every decision Musk makes is bad for free speech, safety, business. #StopToxicTwitter https://t.co/Blt3EaF9L3
— Nora Benavidez (@AttorneyNora) April 18, 2023
See how it works? Allowing people to speak more freely is “bad for free speech”. Real free speech means forcing people to utter words and phrases that contradict reality and that they themselves don’t even believe.
Orwell, eat your heart out.
Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon had some wise words to say about the saga:
This is an overdue and important update. The old policy treated factually accurate statements as enforceable policy violations. It didn’t merely prohibit harassment; it blocked truth. Gender ideology should be debated, not imposed by force — especially on a “platform for free… https://t.co/yzyEQrogKK
— Seth Dillon (@SethDillon) April 19, 2023
He added, “The idea that trans-identifying people can’t handle even the slightest pushback is horribly condescending. If they respected themselves, they’d be fighting against policies predicated on their fragility.”
Failing that, perhaps they could log off of Twitter and get some fresh air.
___
Originally published at MercatorNet. Photo by John Cameron on Unsplash.
Recent Articles:
27 August 2026
2.5 MINS
According to the bombshell report, the Biden administration told agencies to treat restrictions on these drugs as discrimination. The Trump administration now wants hospitals investigated.
27 August 2026
1.8 MINS
When compassion replaces judgment, victims vanish from the story. From a Massachusetts mother's murder trial to Britain's A66 tragedy, we're losing the language to call evil by its name.
27 August 2026
4.8 MINS
Bishop Fulton Sheen argued Communism and capitalism share a common root—materialism divorced from morality. That affinity, this piece argues, explains China's persecution of Christians today.
27 August 2026
2.6 MINS
Religious leaders are urging Labor to exempt faith-based charities from its new 30 per cent discretionary trust tax, warning the reform could severely cut philanthropic funding for vulnerable Australians.
26 August 2026
1.6 MINS
Victoria's cults inquiry report lacks clear definitions and religious freedom safeguards. ACL welcomes support for survivors but warns mainstream churches and homeschooling families could be wrongly caught up.
26 August 2026
4.5 MINS
Hindu Dara Singh, convicted for burning missionary Graham Staines and his sons alive in 1999, is seeking early release. His case reopens questions about justice, remorse, and religious violence in India.
25 August 2026
10 MINS
When Sophie Cunningham's comments on transgender athletes in women's sports went viral, a WNBA sideshow became something bigger: a clash between two rival stories about creation, identity, and redemption.





