mRNA shots DNA contamination ~ suicide

What the Shot?!

17 October 2023

3.8 MINS

Would Australians have consented if they knew the potential risks?

The bombshell discovery of DNA contamination in mRNA Covid shots has shocked and alarmed scientists around the globe. They are calling on regulators to urgently stop the injections and conduct a full safety evaluation.

Following Kevin McKernan’s initial discovery earlier in 2023, his findings have been independently verified by several internationally recognised labs around the world, including Dr Philip Buckhaults and Dr Sin Lee.

These results were again confirmed most recently in Germany when biologist Dr Jurgen Kirchner tested various batches of the Pfizer product (Comirnaty) at his laboratory in Magdeburg, and discovered DNA contamination that he claims exceeds regulatory levels by a factor of 200-350.

Dr Kirchner followed up with a letter to Health Minister Karl Lauterbach on 20 August 2023, attaching the results of the findings. The official reply from the ministerial office was unimpressive, to say the least:

’(…) the Federal Ministry of Health has no evidence of possible DNA contamination in the Covid-19 vaccine Comirnaty (BioNTech/Pfizer) that has been marketed in Europe and Germany (…) From a local perspective, there is therefore no need for further action.’

This lack of alarm has frustrated members of the scientific community who ask, ‘Under what regulatory system doesn’t this lead to immediate withdrawal from market?’

In the US, testimonies from Dr McKernan to the FDA, Dr Phillip Buckhaults, and Dr Janci Lindsay to the South Carolina Senate seem to raise alarm from all except the therapeutic regulator, the FDA.

You might think, ‘Well, this is all overseas,’ and therefore not relevant to Australia. Well, dear reader, you may change your mind when you learn that the COVID mRNA injections are manufactured in just a handful of facilities around the world, and none of them in Australia. This concerns us too.

Warning Bells

Many worry that DNA contamination in the mRNA vaccines could bring with it a truckload of serious risks and potential adverse outcomes, including the possibility of genomic integration. That is, the DNA in the injection becomes a part of the DNA of a person’s cells.

The repeated and verified finding of DNA contamination has alarmed scientists from different disciplines and, as McKernan notes, ‘It is important for readers to see where various divergent voices agree.’ Despite being a proponent for the mRNA platform, Buckhaults describes his alarm at the finding, ‘… and the possible consequences of this both in terms of human health and biology.’ In testifying to the Senate, he adds, ‘But you should be alarmed at the regulatory process that allowed it to get there.’

World-renowned Professor Wafik El-Deiry, Director of the Cancer Centre at Brown University and known for his work in identifying genes associated with cancer, added his voice to the conversation, stating Buckhaults’ testimony was ‘good science raising concerns about contamination of Covid mRNA vaccines with DNA’. He adds:

‘[Buckhaults] explains how pieces of naked DNA allowed in protein vaccines at a certain threshold was not so problematic in a different era but that with encapsulation in liposomes they can now easily get into cells. If they get into cells they can integrate into the genome which is permanent, heritable, and has a theoretical risk of causing cancer depending on where in the genome they integrate. There is a need for more research into what happens in stem cells and I would add germ-line, heart, (and) brain. I am also concerned about prolonged production of spike for months with the pseudouridine in the more stable RNA.’

‘Blood clots, myocarditis, cardiac arrests, and other adverse effects are documented,’ adds El-Deiry. Many believe there’s an urgent need to quantify this problem as DNA is itself prothrombotic and could be the cause of some of the rare but serious side effects, like sudden death from cardiac arrest.

Dr Janci Lindsay, a biochemist and molecular biologist, agrees with these concerns and has spent months calling for the shots to be suspended. Alongside the identified risks of genomic integration, autoimmunity, and cancer, Lindsay says other possibilities include gut bacteria (E. coli) taking up DNA plasmids and becoming ‘perpetual spike factories’ or incorporating the antibiotic resistance gene. There is another potential issue Lindsay highlights,

‘If there’s that much (DNA) plasmid in the shots, there’s a very good chance that there’s bacterial endotoxin in the shots… bacterial proteins which can cause anaphylaxis and even death.’

Muddled Process

You may wonder how the DNA and other potential contaminants got into some of these products. Well, it all comes down to the manufacturing process, as discussed in a recent BMJ article. The clinical trials involving around 40,000 people were conducted using injections manufactured via ‘Process 1’, which involved in vitro transcription of synthetic DNA. This is essentially a ‘clean’ process.

However, this process is not viable for mass production, so the manufacturers switched to ‘Process 2’, which involves using E. coli bacteria to replicate the plasmids. Getting the plasmids out of the E. coli. can be challenging and may result in residual plasmids, and possibly bacterial endotoxin, in the vaccines. Australian Professor Geoff Pain provides extensive details on these endotoxins.

With the highest rates of adverse events and injuries we’ve ever seen for a ’provisionally approved’ product, you would think any regulator worth their salt would be jumping in to ensure that what has been discovered overseas isn’t so in Australia. But it seems the burden of proof is falling on everyone but the regulator.

From the very start, countless medical and legal professionals have called out the ethical disaster of ‘un-informed’ consent and these experimental injections. Informed consent requires a full discussion of the known and potentially unknown risks of any medication or treatment. This, and the coercion, manipulation, and mandates applied to the Australian people, made informed consent impossible.

How many Australians, I wonder, would have agreed to receive an injection that potentially contained DNA with all the inherent risks described?

None, is my guess.

___

Originally published at The Spectator Australia. Photo by Karolina Grabowska.

We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.

Fake news and censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate now.

7 Comments

  1. Stephen Lewin 17 October 2023 at 8:46 am - Reply

    Thanks Doctor Julie for this valuable additional information that deserves a urgent response from health authorities here and everywhere . Will be interesting to see the response from the excess deaths inquiry held this week in Canberra .

  2. Countess Antonia Maria Violetta Scrivanich 17 October 2023 at 10:09 am - Reply

    Am still trying to get over the harm the vaccines have done to me (nearly killed me ).

  3. David Hallett 17 October 2023 at 10:16 am - Reply

    These reports of DNA contamination of some mRNA vaccines are very alarming, especially the prospect of genomic integration and possible transmission to children through conception. I suspect that these reports are alarming to FDA, TGA and other regulatory bodies around the world for three reasons: 1. Prevent alarm in the masses; 2. Worry that checking processes were flawed and/or insufficient which could lead to blame; and particularly 3. Prevent worldwide mass litigation processes from those who have suffered myocardial and other problems as well as the worry in people that genomic changes could, in future, be devastating to the health of those who have received a contaminated vaccine as well as to the health of offspring through conception. If these three reasons are true, what a mess caused by the rush to try and find a vaccination way out of the rushed lockdown process for countless millions of citizens.

  4. Gail Petherick 17 October 2023 at 2:34 pm - Reply

    May Gd bless you Dr Julie and may many read your findings. May the Medical fraternity come to read it and take heed of all that has been discovered that is highly dangerous to many, young, od and otherwise. Thank you for your courageous reporting.

  5. Leonie Robson 17 October 2023 at 6:57 pm - Reply

    Thankyou seems a very deficient word to offer you and your band of warriors…. nevertheless, thankyou Dr. Julie.

  6. Rose 17 October 2023 at 9:17 pm - Reply

    praying for you Dr Julie that you will have supernatural mental physical and spirutual strength. praying thay miracles will happen tomorrow yp open posative doors

  7. H Harrison 18 October 2023 at 2:06 pm - Reply

    Thankyou again Dr Julie. We need more like this report to confirm medically what many suspected.

Leave A Comment

Recent Articles:

Use your voice today to protect

Faith · Family · Freedom · Life

MOST POPULAR

ABOUT

The Daily Declaration is an Australian Christian news site dedicated to providing a voice for Christian values in the public square. Our vision is to see the revitalisation of our Judeo-Christian values for the common good. We are non-profit, independent, crowdfunded, and provide Christian news for a growing audience across Australia, Asia, and the South Pacific. The opinions of our contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of The Daily Declaration. Read More.

MOST COMMENTS

GOOD NEWS

HALL OF FAME

BROWSE TOPICS

BROWSE GENRES