
The Boil on the Backside of the British Parliament Isn’t Suella Braverman
There’s a boil on the backside of the British parliament, and it isn’t Suella Braverman.
The UK Home Secretary was fired this week because she’s been bold enough to say what the average discerning voter in the West is thinking.
British Prime Minister Rishi Sunik sidelined Suella, in what she labelled a catastrophic failure to carry out the will of the people.
Addressing the PM in a scathing three-page letter, Braverman inferred that by backstabbing her, Sunik had betrayed British people.
“As you know, I accepted your offer to serve as home secretary in October 2022 on certain conditions,” Braverman protested.
“Despite you having been rejected [for the office], I agreed to support you because of the firm assurances you gave me on key policy priorities.”
Those key policies, Braverman added, were:
- Reduce legal immigration.
- Stop illegal immigration by stopping the boats, and freeing Britain from being weighed down by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
- Deliver BREXIT’s Northern Ireland Protocol, and remove EU laws via The Retained EU Law reform bill (2022).
- Protect biological sex, safeguard single-sex spaces, and empower parents to know what is being taught to their children.
Let Down
“I trusted you,” she wrote, adding,
“It is generally agreed that my support [for your candidacy as Prime Minister] was a pivotal factor in winning the leadership contest and thus enabling you to become prime minister.”
Sunik has shown he has ‘no appetite for doing what is necessary in fulfilling the pledge he made to the British people,” she said.
Braverman then described his leadership as “uncertain, weak, and lacking in the qualities of leadership that this country needs.”
“These are not just pet interests of mine,” Braverman said.
“They are what we promised the British people in our 2019 manifesto, which led to a landslide victory.”
“They,” she explained, “are what people voted for in the 2016 Brexit referendum.”
In the letter posted to X, now seen by over 22.9 million people in less than 24 hours, Braverman also condemned Sunik for refusing to listen or even work with her.
To which she added,
“It is a privilege to serve and one we should not take for granted. Service requires bravery and thinking of the common good. It is not about occupying the office as an end in itself.
“Someone needs to be honest: your plan is not working…”
It has been inspiring to look out at a room filled with 1500 people committed to building a movement of hopeful vision. Seeing connections being made, friendships started, and stories being shared. #ARC2023 pic.twitter.com/1IW32maiBU
— The Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (@arc_forum) November 1, 2023
Common Sense
As I recounted for Caldron Pool and The Spectator Australia in early October, Braverman isn’t the biggest threat to compassion, social cohesion, and the nation-state — her dishonest critics are.
Her speech delivered at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) had all the earmarks of a leader with her ear to the ground.
Braverman encouraged responsible borders and sustainable immigration, and defended Britain and the nation-state.
For this, Braverman drew the ire of the United Nations, who ominously said, it had “taken note of her speech.”
They then played the LGBTQ+ card, which attracted a joint statement of rebuke from Elton John and his AIDS foundation, saying, “We are very concerned.”
Their beef was with Braverman’s belief that identifying as “LGBTQ+” shouldn’t mean instant British citizenship for illegal immigrants (paraphrased).
From declaring that multiculturalism had failed, to rejecting open borders, and opposing the LGBTQ+ takeover of law enforcement, Braverman is every bit a Margaret Thatcher.
She is therefore everything the World Economic (WEF) Fourth Reich is not.
SB 4 PM!
___
Originally published at Caldron Pool.
2 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
16 July 2026
5 MINS
We're told that progressive politics equals compassion, inclusion and kindness. But shocking reactions to Ann Widdecombe's murder — celebrating her death and hoping she died in extreme pain — reveal the socialist left's blatant 'hate speech' hypocrisy and disturbing double standards of the highest degree.
16 July 2026
3.6 MINS
Jason Clare’s “vanilla” attack on One Nation's immigration policy dissolved under scrutiny, leaving only fruit salad and spin.
16 July 2026
4.7 MINS
As Democratic Socialists consolidate power at every level of government, House Speaker Mike Johnson is sounding the urgent alarm: these candidates don't want to reform America — they want a revolution to "tear it down to its foundations and create a communist utopia. This is serious stuff."
16 July 2026
4.8 MINS
The Covid lockdowns may not have been remotely effective, but at least they harmed millions of people and created long-lasting negative impacts that we’re still dealing with today. That’s the conclusion of a massive new body of research.
15 July 2026
3.9 MINS
UK authorities are treating the murder of devout Christian and former British MP Ann Widdecombe as domestic terrorism.
15 July 2026
4.4 MINS
In an age when our Prime Minister openly jokes about 'shagging' and candidly discusses his marital sex life, we might think the question of modesty is settled. It's not. In fact, it's never been more urgent.
15 July 2026
16.4 MINS
Months of public statements by conspiracy theorist commentator Candace Owens about Charlie Kirk's death are facing a legal reckoning in Utah. As evidence mounts against Tyler Robinson and witnesses take the stand, her narrative is crumbling under courtroom scrutiny.






thank you for this article on Suella …the government in UK and in Australia should take note ….
Brave woman who was back-stabbed for trying to implement the policies which had won her Party government. We have exactly the same problems, but, no one has the courage to tell WEF , UN , etc to ‘butt out “.For example, we don’t need more Moslems leading marches blocking city streets or stopping ports , or, the 800 coming here from Gaza . Their immigration has been fast-tracked . Potential Terrorists ?