The Prime Minister Must Reject the WHO Pandemic Treaty
This week, I authored a letter to the Prime Minister urging him to walk away from the IHR amendments and the WHO Pandemic Treaty. The letter was signed by thirteen fellow Parliamentarians, whom I thank for their support.
Beginning on May 27, representatives of member states of the World Health Assembly, including Australia, will meet in Geneva to discuss the amendments to the International Health Regulations and the World Health Organisation’s International Instrument On Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response (aka the “Pandemic Treaty”).
If ratified, these instruments would grant the WHO greater authority regarding international pandemic responses and preparation, including obliging nations via international law to prevent the spread of “misinformation and disinformation” and to potentially speed up the development of “pandemic related products”.
Apparently, the “pandemic related products” (aka COVID vaccines) were not made speedily enough!
We know that the terms “misinformation” and “disinformation” have been used to demonise objectively true statements about COVID-19, such as the fact that its lethality was exaggerated, that lockdowns would not work, and about the effectiveness of “pandemic-related products” developed to “stop the spread”. Such terms are easily weaponised and how they are interpreted is critical.
Given what we experienced over the past few years, we should be exiting the WHO or at the least, decreasing, not increasing, the authority bestowed upon unelected global health bureaucrats and “experts”.
At the outset of the 2020 pandemic period, the WHO did not scrutinise China’s possible involvement in gain-of-function research in Wuhan, which may have triggered the pandemic.
The WHO also advocated for mask mandates and total lockdowns, both of which are nonsensical and arguably caused more harm than good to peoples’ health and wellbeing. What qualifies the WHO to be in control of pandemic responses anyway?
My Bid to Reject the WHO Pandemic Treaty
This week, I authored a letter to the Prime Minister urging him to walk away from the IHR amendments and the Pandemic Treaty. The letter was signed by thirteen fellow Parliamentarians, whom I thank for their support.
You can read that letter here:
Today the Prime Minister received a letter co-signed by a group of 14 cross party Federal Parliamentarians requesting the Government walk away from the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations and the “WHO Pandemic Treaty”.
A meeting of the World Health… pic.twitter.com/GzSykwOtv0
— Senator Alex Antic (@SenatorAntic) May 14, 2024
I then spoke about this critical meeting in the Senate and you can watch that speech here:
The Prime Minister can and must instruct Australia’s delegate to the World Health Assembly to reject the IHR amendments and the Pandemic Treaty.
___
Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
2 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
10 December 2024
2.7 MINS
The Australian economy is tanking. A large part of the cause is government spending, and yet Labor treasurer Jim Chalmers believes all is well. Rather than motivate businesses to build growth, Labor has chosen to further bloat the bureaucracy instead.
10 December 2024
12.6 MINS
We need to go back almost 20 years to the time when the inaugural Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued the first dramatic arrest warrant for a sitting head of state. Will it prove a case of three strikes and you are out with respect to global governance?
10 December 2024
5.8 MINS
How much worse things get in Australia, in large measure, depends on the Labor leaders running the nation and most states. Ugly antisemitism seems doomed to simply worsen if they remain in power.
10 December 2024
3.8 MINS
Regrettably and importantly, the assisted dying bill gives no direction as to what the doctor should do if the “lethal” dose does not, in fact, kill the patient. This will certainly happen and it needs to be specified if the bill is to become law.
9 December 2024
4.3 MINS
My stand is against the treatment of Israel by the Australian government and the United Nations. The Australian government would rather reward the terrorism of October 7 and has continually pushed for a two-state solution, when all the terrorists want is a one-state solution.
9 December 2024
6.7 MINS
What is the difference between 9 November 1938 in Germany and 6 December 2024 in Melbourne? Nothing, except some 86 years. In both cases, Jewish synagogues were set alight. The truth is, Jewish people no longer feel safe in this country.
6 December 2024
6 MINS
Australians are already feeling the cost of the 'renewable' transition, but there are far higher costs to come, according to Chris Uhlmann's new documentary 'The Real Cost of Net Zero'.
Thank you Senator Antic and co-signatories – we desperately need to keep Australia free of this WHO total over reach – keep the pressure on!
Thank you Senator Antic and c o-signatories! We desperately need to avoid falling under this WHO over reach – please keep the pressure on!