
Was Tim Costello Right to Condemn Christians Who Support Trump?
Few politicians evoke such strong reactions as Donald Trump, including in Christian circles.
Former CEO of World Vision Australia and Christian commentator Tim Costello laid his cards on the table by writing a strong critique of Christians who support Trump.
In a recent article entitled ‘I am a Christian, but my tribe supports Donald Trump. I feel like I no longer belong’, Costello writes:
“Eighty per cent of white evangelicals voted for Trump in 2016… Whatever my fellow US evangelicals think about the supposed evilness of Joe Biden and the Democrats, they condemn themselves by supporting a man who denied he lost in 2020, refused to attend Biden’s inauguration (the first losing president to do this) and continues the lie of the Big Steal. This man should never be supported by anyone who believes in democracy, where one person, one vote is an expression of my faith that everyone is made in the image of God.”
Those are strong words.
While he’s writing as an Australian who doesn’t vote in US elections, he touched a nerve felt by many Christians around the world: how could Christians support a man like Donald Trump?
While I sympathise with Costello’s lament about the often-strong support many US Christians provide Trump, I am concerned by his argument. It’s one thing to say you disagree with Christians supporting Trump. It’s another to say Christians “condemn themselves” by supporting Trump – that it’s effectively ungodly to vote for Trump.
Here’s why I’m concerned:
1) The Bible does not mandate how Christians should vote in the upcoming US election.
Costello and many Christians look at Trump’s character and conclude he is not fit for office, and thus Christians shouldn’t vote for him. In their eyes, Trump’s statements about women, immigrants and the 2020 election should disqualify Trump from Christian support.
Other Christians, however, take a different view of deciding how to vote.
Many take a “package deal” view of elections, noting that voting for one candidate or the other doesn’t only install the candidate, but also their policies. American theologian Wayne Gruden (no fan of Trump’s character) argued in 2020 before the last election:
The question now facing the nation is not, “Does Donald Trump have an exemplary moral character?” or, “Does Donald Trump have flaws?” or even, “Do I like Donald Trump?” The question is, “Which of two package deals is better for the nation?”
(a) Donald Trump and Republican policies or
(b) Joe Biden and Democratic policies?
There are no other choices. The nation will either have the option (a) or option (b) as a whole package for the next four years. If I withhold support from Trump, that makes it easier for Biden to win, and thereby for Democratic policies to bring (in my opinion) great destructiveness to the nation…
In other words, according to Grudem, although Trump’s character is less than stellar, given the alternative ‘package’ of Biden, Trump is the better choice.
Others argue neither candidate is suitably qualified, so Christians should vote for a third party.
Now, chances are one of these views resonates with you more than another. Perhaps you’re with Costello. Maybe you’re sympathetic to Grudem’s view. Or voting for the third party is where you land.
But I’m not here to push one view or the other. Rather, I’m here to ask a more basic question:
Which of the above views on decision-making – the ‘character’ view, the ‘whole package’ view or the third-party view – does the Bible affirm as godly?
Which view does it condemn as ungodly?
Which is the ‘biblical’ way of deciding who to vote for?
The Bible doesn’t come close to answering these questions.
Deciding who to vote for requires Christians to understand and weigh different (and often competing) factors: how much do you weigh a person’s speech and character versus their policies? Which policies matter more than others? What about their beliefs and their party’s ideology? How exactly should you weigh these factors and come to a decision?
Yes, biblical principles – such as the importance of character, policies, and political ideology should all be considered by Christians, but in the end, different Christians (like Grudem and Costello) will weigh these factors differently.
Deciding how to vote is complex. It’s arguable. And thus disputable:
2) Christians must be free to come to different conclusions about issues the Bible doesn’t address directly.
The Bible doesn’t give us a clear command on how to vote, let alone whether it’s acceptable or not to vote for Trump.
In other words, there’s no “straight line” from the biblical text to the voting decision; rather, there’s a “jagged line” from the Biblical text to the decision, which makes any decision contestable. And that’s ok: it’s what the Bible would describe as a ‘disputable matter’ (Rom 14:1), over which Christians can and should be free to disagree (agreeably!).
Pastor and theologian Kevin DeYoung sums this up well:
‘While our church might discipline a member for holding the positions [Biden] holds or for behaving the way Trump has behaved, this does not mean we have biblical grounds for disciplining a church member who, for any number of reasons and calculations, may decide that voting for either candidate (or neither) makes the most sense. And if we wouldn’t discipline someone for a presidential vote, we should stop short of saying such a vote is sinful and shameful.’ [1]
And therein lies the crux of my concern with Costello’s article: he condemns Christians for something the Bible doesn’t. Costello condemns people for voting for Trump, rather than seeing the issue the way the Bible does — a matter of individual conscience (cf. Romans 14).
Who to vote for in 2024 is not something Christians should divide over. Instead, to paraphrase the apostle Paul in Romans 14:3-4:
“Let not the anti-Trumper despise the pro-Trumper and let not the pro-Trumper pass judgment on the anti-Trumper, for God has welcomed him. Who are you to pass judgement on the servant of another? It is before his own master that he stands or falls. And he will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make him stand.”
Yes, politics brings out strong emotions. Christians will disagree over politics and disagree passionately. But regardless, let’s welcome each other despite our political differences.
Even when it’s over polarising politicians like Donald Trump.
___
[1] Emphasis added. DeYoung wrote this article in 2016 and applied it to Clinton vs. Trump. I consider it applicable to the current US election.___
Republished with thanks to AkosBalogh.com. Image courtesy of Adobe.
5 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
26 June 2026
4.4 MINS
Channel Nine just supercharged Karl Stefanovic’s conservative brand power. The network has officially confirmed they’ve cancelled the Today show host over a now-deleted interview with UK independent journalist Tommy Robinson.
26 June 2026
3.9 MINS
Christian expression and prayer has increased during the 2026 World Cup, that even secular commentators admit the fact, while scrambling for secular explanations. The upward trend is not just about soccer, but reflects a societal trend towards Christianity.
26 June 2026
5 MINS
Identificational repentance is a very powerful corporate, priestly (1 Peter 2:9) prayer weapon, in which believers stand in the gap for their family, church, city, or nation by naming the sins that have shaped a people, confessing them before God, and turning from those patterns in heartfelt humility.
26 June 2026
3.8 MINS
Pauline Hanson’s critics would rather play dumb than debate multiculturalism's failures. It's much easier than having a serious debate over monoculturalism — or any debate at all.
26 June 2026
2.6 MINS
Nation First examines the interview that rattled the woke media class, and asks why a straightforward conversation with Tommy Robinson was enough to end Karl Stefanovic’s career at Nine.
26 June 2026
8.5 MINS
Sowell once flirted with Marxism, attracted by its promises of equality of outcome, only to reject it. Here are some choice quotes from him on what true equality means — and most importantly for today — what it does not.
25 June 2026
2.4 MINS
The Australian Christian Lobby is hosting screenings of the groundbreaking documentary Born Alive, Left to Die across Australia. It is time for truth, accountability, and change. Attend a screening and invite others to join you.






Tim Costello would do well to re-read the story of David, the greatest ever King of Israel. His character was deeply flawed. He lied, he cheated, he arranged the murder of another to cover up his adultery with Bathsheba. In so many ways a man unsuitable for public life and the exercise of power, yet God chose David and when he repented he forgave him of his sins.
Tim Costello would do well to attempt to bring Donald Trump to repentance and while he is at it he might even try to bring Joe Biden to repentance as well.
Well said!
Akos, Your piece is excellent, thank you. As I have said elsewhere, I think Tim Costello was stuck in a time warp. He has not woken up to the fact that ‘the left’ is no longer the left he grew up with. They have completely changed their guiding principles, so much so that, in my book, I would never vote for the left again! Is Trump perfect? Most certainly not, nor am I, but God still sees fit to use me. Let’s have grace and trust God that he will work out his plan and purpose the best way possible.
Tim Costello has been watching too much MSNBC and CNN.
Those that stifle opposition and freedom of speech have historically never been the good guys, and mainstream Christian leaders have had a terrible historical track record on who to politically support that won’t end up decimating a society or killing millions.
Our time is turning out to be no different.
Tim Costello condemns himself by taking his talking points straight from the mouths of marxists without a critical glance.