
Men Who Think They are Women Included in Women’s Pain Inquiry
Now we have a rainbow totalitarian regime that forces even doctors to go against medical science to accommodate the feelings of men who think they are women.
LGBTIQA+ political activism is a menace to women’s health, children’s safety and freedom of speech.
Its latest intrusion into mainstream values comes in the form of a Victorian Government inquiry into women’s pain.
Bizarrely, the Jacinta Allan Labor Government also asks to hear from biological males who claim to be women.
This is a shameless insult to women and girls.
How can women’s health be treated seriously if men who think they are women — who cannot possibly relate to the physiological challenges that are unique to women — are included in the inquiry?
Sadly, the medical profession is too scared to speak openly.
Threatened
It is un-Australian that a prominent Victorian surgeon could only speak to the media about his concerns for fear of de-registration.
Where is freedom of speech? What is the place of medical science under what is now effectively rainbow rule?
Speech and science are now subservient to LGBTIQA+ ideology thanks to our weak and woke political class in both the Liberal and Labor parties. They simply follow the radical Greens, which first championed this nonsense, starting with their crusade to rob marriage of its gender diversity requirement.
So we now have a rainbow totalitarian regime that forces even doctors to go against medical science to accommodate the feelings of men who think they are women.
It’s well known that many men who identify as women do so because they get a sexual thrill, known as autogynephilia, out of their assumed identity.
Absurd
Women’s Forum Australia chief executive Rachael Wong said it best when she told the Herald Sun that Labor’s inquiry “makes a mockery of women’s pain and women are understandably angry”.
She went on:
It’s absurd to have to state the obvious, but it is physiologically impossible for men to experience female health conditions or the pain that comes with them.
Many of these conditions, like endometriosis, fibroids and PCOS (polycystic ovary syndrome), have a devastating impact on women’s quality of life, yet are under-diagnosed and under-treated.
Just when it looks like they may be taking women’s health issues seriously, the government wants men to have their say. It’s insulting.
Dangerous
The Victorian surgeon, speaking anonymously because rainbow rights have killed free speech and medical science, said, “gender-affirming care (is) creating havoc in health care”.
He told The Herald Sun that when it came to health care, biology needed to be put before identity. “Patients present to doctors in their ‘new’ gender and don’t reveal their actual biology. This has massive ramifications on care,” he said.
“If doctors say anything negative, they can be reported to the regulator or even have their registration threatened.”
“Junior doctors spend time learning how to speak to these people and not focusing on the basics like diabetes, asthma or breast cancer.”
Here’s how The Herald Sun reported the response of the Victorian Health Minister:
Victorian Health Minister Mary-Anne Thomas has backed the inclusion of biological males in a major women’s pain study.
Ms Thomas on Monday said Victorian women were impacted by their “sex and gender”, calling backlash to the inclusion of biological males “divisive”.
“Let’s be clear. Women are impacted by both the sex, which is their biology, and their gender, which is their identity as women,” she said.
Ms Thomas was asked multiple times what trans women might wish to discuss as part of the inquiry regarding gender-based pain management.
But the health minister could not provide an answer.
“We (women) haven’t been believed, we’ve been under-diagnosed and it is a consequence of both our sex and our gender,” she said.
What a joke.
___
Republished with thanks to Family First. Image courtesy of Pexels.
3 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
5 August 2026
6.8 MINS
Census night is less than a week away, and the religion question is more confusing than it should be. Here’s exactly how Christians — practising or not — should answer it, and why the ABS’s design deserves scrutiny.
5 August 2026
2.3 MINS
What happens when the side arguing 'the West shouldn't be suspicious of Islam' essentially tells their opponents: 'Be nice to us or the mob outside will get you'? An Oxford debate provides the answer.
5 August 2026
3.8 MINS
The Berlin Pride attack has reignited questions about ideology, truth and prejudice, exposing how political narratives can distort public reactions and deepen suspicion towards Christianity.
5 August 2026
3.4 MINS
A new study finds people with multiple myeloma need more than medical treatment, urging doctors to address patients’ emotional, psychological, and spiritual needs alongside clinical care, in the face of impending death.
4 August 2026
5.2 MINS
How do you feel about listening to music that's been made totally through machine learning? Does it matter if you can't tell if it was made by a human or AI? Could the lyrics and emotion still resonate with you? Now, what about AI music made to worship God, or spread the Christian message — does it actually matter?
4 August 2026
9.1 MINS
Thirty Muslims living in the West have made their intentions crystal clear. They've announced their plans to dominate your country, replace your values, and transform your way of life — all on camera, in their own words. They're not hiding their Islamic agenda. The question is: When will we start believing them?
4 August 2026
6.6 MINS
Newly released emails and diary entries reignite debate over Anthony Fauci's pandemic leadership, exposing stark contrasts between his public statements and private assessments.






I notice that ‘being divisive’ is treated by Ms Thomas as something not allowed – the implication being that division is harmful.
Is division always harmful ?
No, division is good when it results from distinguishing (dare I say, discriminating) between true and false, right and wrong.
The less air time we give to the views of the so-called progressive activists, the more air time we have to tell the truth.
Let the liars have their lies to their fill.
We who recognise and value truth DO NOT HAVE TO all adhere to their Lies-based agenda.
Let’s keep promoting and championing the Family First Party truth-based agenda, which is available for anyone to freely choose to adhere to.
Doctors, stiffen your spines !
Clan together to stand openly for biological truth.
How can we, your patients, trust you if you’re allowing LIES to be your framework for diagnosis and treatment ??
My husband was hopeless giving birth to our children. I had to do all the hard work!
Under the sub heading Threatened in the article above the word ‘anonymously’ appears to be missing.
It’s is nothing short of an absolute lie that a man can become a woman. Where are all the university biologists to say nothing of medical professors and the like when it comes to publicly defending what is a scientific fact… sex is determined at conception and the DNA of every single cell in the body of every male (an female too) attests to this fundamental truth.