Albo Should Fire Jim Chalmers for Suggesting that Dutton is as Dangerous as a “Domestic Terrorist”
Doubling down on Dutton derangement syndrome (DDS), Jim Chalmers has insinuated that the leader of the opposition is as dangerous as a domestic terrorist.
The Labor treasurer smeared the opposition as racists, and suggested that anyone not voting for Labor, were themselves guilty of racism.
In a divisive address to the John Curtin Research Centre (JCRC), the Labor treasurer invoked culture war rhetoric, while accusing Peter Dutton of starting one.
Importing the radical left’s “weird” anti-Trump propaganda, the Labor treasurer followed the Prime Minister in a weird attempt to make the same mud stick to Dutton.
Personal Attacks
Chalmers accused the opposition leader of being the “most divisive leader of a major political party in Australia’s modern history.”
This was “no accident”, Chalmers howled.
He then accused Dutton of deliberately “embracing political divisiveness” that’s fuelling political violence around the world.
Calling Dutton “destructive and divisive”, Chalmers described the opposition leader as pathologically dangerous.
Projecting, Chalmers accused Dutton of “picking at” and “preying on divisions in society for political advantage.”
This, he said, is unlike, Labor, who want to “heal social divisions.”
The Labor treasurer claimed that Dutton “picks fights and stokes division on national security because he’s got no idea about economics.”
Hypocritically, Chalmers threw up another far-left furphy, stating that Dutton’s “wolf-whistle only plays one note.”
Despite Islam not being a race, Chalmers exploited the “Islamophobia is racism” lie, by promoting “Dutton is a racist” hype.
The latter is Marxist mud thrown in the opposition leader’s face over his concerns about potentially bringing Jew-hating genocidal jihadists to Australia.
Continuing the assault, Chalmers then made the ridiculous claim that Dutton was “starting a culture war because he has no idea how to finish the fight against inflation.”
Most of the speech is yet another typical example of leftwing “hate speech” hypocrisy.
The John Curtin Research Centre address started off with the usual Laborite hagiography.
Chalmers waffled on about how Labor aspires to fill the shoes of Chifley, Curtin, and Hawke.
Rewriting history by treating Keating, Rudd, and Swan as economic saviours, Chalmers put himself in line for the same “accolades”, selling what he called the “fourth economy.”
As a side-bar, that term alone makes me wonder who’s writing the Labor treasurer’s scripts.
In case you’ve missed it, the “fourth economy” is far too close to the Fourth Economic Revolution platform, promoted by wannabe World Economic Fourth Reich, the WEF.
Hypocrites
The treasurer’s ramblings were an early election preamble.
All this appears harmless, until Chalmers concluded with the all-out assault on the LNP, and non-Labor voters.
Chalmers’ blatant culture war offensive was hypocrisy personified.
His remarks didn’t just vilify the majority of the nation, they were the tu quoque fallacy on steroids.
Most thinking Australians will rightly see this speech as a farce.
The track record for “division” rests squarely in Labor’s camp.
Chalmers’ party tried to divide Australians with The Voice.
They are the party of censorship, circa “debate is hate.”
As well as the party dividing up society into either an oppressed or oppressor class by way of Intersectionality – where you’re either an ally of the acronym army, or you’re the enemy.
Labor is the party of Indigenous ethnocentrism, which elevates one group based on race above the rest. (Flag included)
They’re also the party refusing to admit that multiculturalism – and not racism – is the actual toxin poisoning multi-ethnic social cohesion.
This doesn’t include calling Dutton a racist, and supporting Teal’s “misogyny” rhetoric, designed to dehumanise and demonise the opposition leader.
Now, Labor is the first government in Australian history to suggest their political opponents are as dangerous as domestic terrorists.
The Labor treasurer telling voters the next election will be a choice between racists and Labor, betrays desperation.
This is the vilest speech in Australian history.
Here is a sitting Labor cabinet minister, arguing that the sitting opposition leader is as dangerous as a domestic terrorist.
Jim Chalmers is no statesman.
His hypocrisy, incitement, and double standards, make this speech dangerous.
This should disqualify the Labor treasurer from any and all leadership positions with immediate effect.
___
Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
5 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
23 April 2025
6 MINS
What does the Bible say about transgenderism? Discover 10 biblical principles that guide a loving and truthful Christian response to transgenderism and gender identity issues.
23 April 2025
6.3 MINS
Pope Francis famously called on Catholics to “make a mess.” He surely did, and now it’s up to us to clean it up.
-
23 April 2025
2.8 MINS
Young Catholics in Arcamanik, Indonesia, have peacefully stopped an Islamic mob from ending an Easter Saturday service. Despite direct opposition, Arcamanik’s Indonesian Christian community is thriving.
-
23 April 2025
1.7 MINS
King Charles has managed to make the Easter message about Islam. To somehow equate Islam as equally valid as Christianity, on of all days, Good Friday, is quite startling.
-
23 April 2025
1.4 MINS
I greatly value my personal memories of Pope Francis. But despite its strengths, in many ways, the Francis pontificate was inadequate to the real issues facing the Church.
-
23 April 2025
2.8 MINS
We are responsible for electing representatives who will govern with justice and integrity, so we should vote for those who possess character, integrity, and a healthy fear of God.
22 April 2025
3.5 MINS
Vatican officials have announced that Pope Francis died early on Easter Monday at the age of 88. Catholics around the globe are mourning the loss of Pope Francis, but his papacy has had a mixed reception.
Umm…. has Chalmers read the threat from the Muslims who have gained “charity” basis from Labor? The Australian Sheikhs know how to portray the Aussie spirit when it comes to helping others, Chalmers and the Muslims could learn a lot from them.
Strident derogatory name-calling seems to be the preferred (dare I say, instinctive) tactic of those who can no longer find any valid evidence-based reason for their defiant stand against their adversary.
Chalmers has shown his true colours. They don’t look good from any angle.
Incisive article!!!
Chalmers’ wish is that there be no debate and no Opposition Party , ie that Australia be a one Party Communist State like China where anyone who criticises is eliminated . I am not racist as my Christian religion teaches that we are all equal before God, but, I have always been against multiculturalism which promotes racism. Small businesses are being forced out of business and hundreds are losing their jobs . In my opinion , Chalmers is a dreadful failure as a Treasurer as time will prove when we go officially into the recession we already are in . Labor is over-spending on the wrong priorities to win votes to be returned to power .
Vile indeed! The Yiddish word “chutzpah” comes to mind, which is defined as a man who is crying “help” while assaulting another man.
Not to mention his arrogance in comparing himself to Hawke and Curtin. That’s reminiscent of the time Dan Quayle compared himself to JFK. Regardless of what you think of Hawke policy wise, Chalmers is an absolute lightweight, both as a politician and as a man. I’d describe him in general as “smarmy”.