Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024 – a Commentary
The government’s website states:
Misinformation and disinformation pose a threat to the safety and wellbeing of Australians, as well as to our democracy, society and economy.
So much has been said and written about this, which is great, but all this common sense does not appear to have reached the majority of our government representatives, with this bill passing the House of Representatives 78 to 57.
No threat to the safety and wellbeing of Australians
First of all, let’s define these two words: misinformation and disinformation. The Oxford Dictionary renders misinformation as wrong information, or the fact that people are misinformed, and disinformation as false information which is intended to mislead, especially propaganda issued by a government organisation to a rival power or the media.
These terms only became part of our everyday language when the COVID era hit. I find that telling. Before COVID, misinformation and disinformation did not exist! What happened?
I think the key point here is in the Oxford definition of disinformation, namely:
especially propaganda issued by a government organization to a rival power or the media.
How ironic that our Labour Government should be at pains to pass a bill to ban propaganda issued by a government, and their government agency will decide what is and isn’t propaganda!
I argue that the only threat to our safety and wellbeing is our government for putting up this bill. Take misinformation. If a citizen is misinformed, it is their responsibility to rectify that situation, not the government’s. Imagine if it was the government’s responsibility, then they would have to craft the narrative and ensure that all of us understand their narrative correctly, and not misinterpret it. All that they could ever expect to be able to do, is to ‘control the narrative’. How could they ever hope to police everyone’s understanding?
Consider disinformation. False information which is intended to mislead. So, there are two aspects here, the creation of lies, untruth and the creation of such disinformation with intent to mislead people.
Has our government got a good record in this regard? No. Let’s go no further than to quote the phrase ‘safe and effective’. When this mantra was parroted, they had no evidence to support such a claim, and as the years have unfolded, it has been shown to be a lie, an untruth, and it was parroted so many times with the intent to mislead people for control and financial gain.
I rest my case; our government is the only threat to our safety and wellbeing.
How, then, should we respond if this bill becomes law?
I admire all those in and out of parliament who spoke up against this bill, but I am not surprised that their advocacy did not prevail. The forces behind the bill are too strong. I go further: they are not merely human forces, they are forces out of the unseen, diabolical world that we are wrestling with. (Ephesians 6: 10-20)
The bill, and any subsequent legislation impacting what we can and cannot say or published is certainly important, but I believe that more important are the forces that are working to cause us to self-censor our speech, our writing and our thoughts.
The battle is for our minds (Philippians 4: 7). As long as we stay anchored to the truth, able to recognise the truth and to speak and write the truth, we will be safe, and we will maintain our wellbeing.
If we find ourselves beginning to have sympathy with and understanding for some aspects of the new world order. Then, we have probably begun to cross over to the dark side where we can no longer trust ourselves, our own judgment, and we will be reaching out for those in authority to tell us the truth.
I am not fearful of this bill passing, but disappointed. If this bill results in legislation, that will bring the day closer when we will simply have to take a stand and, peacefully and respectfully, not submit to a bad law, whatever the cost.
A new challenge might then emerge: namely, how will we be able to find the truth if it is being removed from the narrative, to protect us from harm? That will be hard, but I suspect that legislation will not be able to police everything. I think there is certainly a growing tide of rebellion against these forces of censorship. We need only look at the fallout from the recent American election to see that increasing numbers are taking a stand in this regard.
A great place to close would be with the Apostle Paul:
But you be watchful in all things, endure afflictions,
do the work of an evangelist, fulfil your ministry. (2 Timothy 4:5)
___
Image courtesy of Adobe.
7 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
24 January 2025
2.2 MINS
The first person to take issue with Donald Trump’s insistence that there are only two genders was an Episcopalian priest. Of course. Bishop Marianne Budde used her Washington pulpit, tilted to the left, to berate the President for — of all things — agreeing with Moses.
24 January 2025
4.2 MINS
The United States has been captivated by the fires sweeping across Los Angeles, California, destroying nearly everything in their path. A question many have raised goes as follows: “Did God do this?”
23 January 2025
5.7 MINS
I am using "and" in my title more as a type of contrast. So, I am not saying the recent Trump inauguration was a Christian revival, but some similarities can nonetheless be mentioned.
23 January 2025
4.7 MINS
Like Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon's Jeff Bezos seems to have made peace with the incoming president — so much so that he’s ordered the world’s biggest online retailer to scale down DEI.
22 January 2025
4.5 MINS
In his inaugural speech, President Trump vowed 'we will not forget our God'. On retaking the White House, Trump has already acted on his promise to stand for Christian values. Check out his day one reforms here and learn how you can pray for the incoming administration.
22 January 2025
3 MINS
Donald Trump has cemented his 2025 inauguration by proclaiming the dawn of an American Golden Age. Flanked by Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, the Trump family, and Elon Musk, the 45th and now 47th President of the United States declared a “new era of national success.”
22 January 2025
5.5 MINS
Donald Trump has been inaugurated as president of the United States for the second time. While there may be surface political change and new political dynamics, what about the state of civilisation?
Great article Jim!!!!
Many thanks. I was struggling with the ‘panic’ of some requiring signatures and letters. Yes, these are important, but, for me these are the politicians we ‘elected’ and if they are not going to vote for honesty and truth, we made a mistake voting for them. I for one will drill down much deeper in my questioning of whom I might vote for in the future. But there my be a wave of truth flowing over the Pacific Ocean from American that can help push back the tide of nonsense here.
Thanks for your article Jim. I am hoping and praying the cross bench in the Senate will stand their ground and vote against the mis/dis-information Bill. The bias of the legacy media in the US election and their desire to shape and control the narrative shows the danger of mis/dis-information. Australians will be foolish to accept such control.
Stephen, ‘Australians will be foolish to accept such control.’ I agree whole heartedly. But I fear its not that Australians ‘accept’ such control, its that Australians don’t know they are are accepting control. I fear his is a case of mass hypnosis orchestrated by the leftist media.
We can’t trust the majority of politicians. They belong to the Dark Side. Wish we had the 1st Amendment in Australia. Never felt so disgusted in my life ! Senator Duniam will vote against it, as I am informed by her staffer, will Senator Tammy Tyrell. I wonder how long before I am prosecuted for my religious beliefs and criticism of government ? Australia with its support of Terrorists, etc, etc is not a Free Country any more , but, more and more a repressive regime , an imitation of the UK.
If you’re working on letters to Senators you might want to mention Article 19 of the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights:
“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
The Declaration was accepted by the General Assembly at its third session in 1948. This session was chaired by Dr H V Evatt of the Australian Labor Party.
I don’t expect that will change the votes of any Labor Senators. But they can’t be reminded often enough of how far they have drifted from that ideal.
Greg, brilliant! Thank you so much for this telling history lesson, that so many often fail to heed.