
A Victory for Life, as the Scottish Parliament Rejects Assisted Suicide Bill
The Scottish Parliament has voted to reject the legalisation of assisted suicide by 69 votes to 57. This is cause for profound gratitude. Christians across the United Kingdom should give thanks to God that this deeply troubling proposal has been turned aside.
The bill, brought forward by Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur, would have allowed terminally ill adults with less than six months to live to obtain medical assistance to end their lives. Scotland would have joined that minority of dark places which say some lives are no longer worth living.
In effect, this bill would have invited the medical profession to cross a moral boundary that civilised societies have long recognised: the deliberate taking of innocent human life. Instead, MSPs have refused to take that step. For now, Scotland has been spared the establishment of a system in which doctors help patients to die.
A Victory for Truth and Compassion
Many people worked tirelessly to ensure that legislators understood the dangers of the proposal. Constituents contacted their representatives. Medical bodies and disability groups warned about the risks to vulnerable people. Church leaders from a range of traditions – including the Church of Scotland, the Roman Catholic Church, and the Free Church of Scotland – publicly appealed to MSPs to reject the bill.
Their message was simple and profoundly Christian, ‘True compassion does not mean helping someone to die, but committing ourselves to care for them in life.’ That statement captures a truth which modern society often forgets. Compassion is not measured by how quickly we remove suffering by eliminating the sufferer, but by our willingness to bear one another’s burdens.
Christians know that human life possesses an inherent dignity because it is created in the image of God (Genesis 1:27). This conviction has shaped Western law and ethics for centuries. The commandment, ‘You shall not murder’ (Exodus 20:13), reflects not merely a religious sentiment, but a fundamental moral principle for human society. When the state authorises assisted suicide, it inevitably erodes that principle.
The Illusion of a “Safe” System
Supporters of assisted suicide frequently speak of ‘safeguards’. Yet the Scottish bill demonstrated how fragile such assurances are. It contained nothing preventing doctors from proactively raising the possibility of assisted suicide with vulnerable patients. There was no clear protection for hospices that wish to care for the dying rather than participate in ending their lives. Even the question of conscience protections for medical professionals had been left unresolved, to be determined later by Westminster.
In other words, legislators were being asked to approve a framework without knowing how basic ethical protections would operate. Experience in other countries shows that once the barrier against assisted suicide is broken, the scope tends to expand. What begins as a measure for the terminally ill can quickly widen to include other categories of suffering. The lesson, as many critics have observed, is that there is no such thing as a ‘safe’ assisted suicide law.
A Distinctly Christian Vision of Life and Death
The Reformed Christian tradition offers a clear theological framework for understanding these questions. The Westminster Larger Catechism, in its exposition of the sixth commandment, teaches that we are called not only to refrain from taking life unlawfully but also to preserve life wherever possible. That includes caring for the sick, comforting the suffering, and protecting those who are most vulnerable.
Life is not ours to dispose of at will. We are stewards of the lives God has given us. As Job confessed in the midst of suffering, ‘The LORD gave, and the LORD has taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD’ (Job 1:21). Our times are in God’s hands, not our own.
For Christians, suffering – though grievous – is never meaningless. The Lord often uses affliction to deepen faith, draw families together, and display the power of sacrificial love. The answer to suffering is not the administration of death but the ministry of care.
The Better Path: Palliative Care
Instead of constructing legal pathways to assisted suicide, society should devote its energy to strengthening palliative care. The dying need relief from pain, emotional support, and the reassurance that their lives remain valuable to those around them.
The Christian tradition has long been at the forefront of such care. Hospitals, hospices, and charitable institutions across Britain owe much to believers who understood that loving our neighbour includes tending to the sick and dying with patience and dignity. That is the path Scotland should pursue.
Encouragement for the Wider UK
The rejection of this bill will also resonate beyond Scotland. Pressure to legalise assisted suicide continues in other parts of the United Kingdom, including Westminster, where similar proposals are being debated. The Scottish vote demonstrates that such measures are not inevitable.
Public concern about the protection of vulnerable people remains strong. Many recognise that legalising assisted suicide would fundamentally alter the relationship between doctor and patient, turning healers into agents of death. Christians should take encouragement from this moment. Thoughtful engagement, prayer, and public witness can make a difference.
Giving Thanks
Above all, believers should respond with thanksgiving. Scripture reminds us that God is sovereign over the affairs of nations and the decisions of rulers (Proverbs 21:1). When legislation that threatens human life is turned aside, it is right to acknowledge the Lord’s providence.
This vote does not end the debate. Those who favour assisted suicide will undoubtedly return with new proposals. But for now, Scotland has stepped back from a grave mistake. And that is good news indeed.
___
Republished with thanks to Evangelical Times. Image courtesy of Adobe.
2 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
3 October 2026
3.7 MINS
The Church is called to be counter-cultural not to be merely contrarian, but because we love God and people. In this world, that will mean going against culture that is contrary to God.
2 October 2026
2.6 MINS
NSW Libertarian Gemma Noiosi is challenging taxpayer-funded activist events, arguing government grants should not bankroll controversial projects or private cultural ventures.
2 October 2026
11.6 MINS
New evidence challenges prevailing assumptions about adolescent sexuality and gender medicine, urging parents, clinicians and Christian leaders to prioritise honest inquiry, careful care and scientific integrity.
2 October 2026
6.6 MINS
A foiled airline attack highlights the courage of passengers and crew who confronted danger, while raising urgent questions about jihadist terrorism and the ideology behind it.
2 October 2026
3.4 MINS
New research highlights the strong links between active Christian faith, marital happiness, sexual satisfaction, family stability and the formation of future generations.
2 October 2026
3.3 MINS
The Lord wants us to pray from a place of faith and resting in him. We can't awaken the Church, but he can — and he wants to do just that.
1 October 2026
3.1 MINS
Christian schools in Western Australia can currently hire staff who share their faith. Under reforms flagged by the Cook Government, they may lose that protection wherever faith is not deemed an “inherent requirement” of the role.






Meanwhile our country continues to shove through assisted dying bills and abortion to day of birth bills. We are lost 🥺
Good on Scotland. Shame on our leaders.