
Elon Musk Scrapped Twitter’s Ban on ‘Misgendering or Deadnaming’
A step forward for free speech.
Twitter moved one step closer towards its mandate as a platform for free expression this month, after the little blue bird removed prohibitions on “misgendering or deadnaming” from its hateful conduct policy.
The change was not announced but made quietly, and was subsequently noticed by online sleuths before being reported by NBC News. The original policy is still visible via Wayback Machine.
Prior to Elon Musk, Twitter had enforced the anti-free speech provision for five long years, under the subheading “slurs and tropes”. Users were deamplified and even deplatformed for using the name given at birth to a person who now identifies as transgender, or their gender pronouns that correspond with, you know, the facts of nature.
As noted by Not the Bee, the policy update “puts Twitter out of step with other social media companies that enforce insane policies and compel false speech, but it puts Twitter back in step with reality”.
The activist-journalist who penned the NBC News critique huffed that “Twitter responded to a request for comment with the Pile of Poo emoji, an automated message it now sends as a reply to all media requests.” In response to the media’s blanket negativity towards Musk’s takeover of Twitter, the new CEO initiated and humorously announced the auto-reply rollout last month:
press@twitter.com now auto responds with 💩
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 19, 2023
Backlash from the wokerati was as predictable as it was dishonest.
CEO of the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) Sarah Kate Ellis claimed that the policy update “is the latest example of just how unsafe the company is for users and advertisers alike”.
Twitter’s decision to covertly roll back its longtime policy is the latest example of just how unsafe the company is for users and advertisers alike. https://t.co/ChR1aQRf95
— Sarah Kate Ellis (@sarahkateellis) April 18, 2023
“Unsafe” is, of course, a euphemism for hurt feelings — though Ellis failed to clarify how exactly advertisers would have their feelings endangered as a result of the policy change.
Ellis went on to claim that Musk’s Twitter now plays host to a “barrage of disinformation and hate about trans people from right wing media personalities, politicians, and the extremists they bolster”.
Her words echoed those of BBC reporter James Clayton, who lived to regret an interview he recently conducted with Elon Musk on the same topic. Initially, Clayton told Musk he has seen a rise in hate speech on Twitter since the takeover, but under further interrogation from Musk, he failed to provide a single example and was forced to change topics:
The irony is James Clayton now has hundreds of examples of hate speech to choose from. Unfortunately they’re all about his disingenuous, car crash interview.pic.twitter.com/zxeNxcRNCw
— Nick Dixon (@nickdixoncomic) April 13, 2023
Another wokester to condemn Twitter’s policy update was Nora Benavidez, Senior Counsel and Director at Free Press. She tweeted:
Today, @glaad has just broke the news that @Twitter surreptitiously removed one sentence in its Hateful Content Policy which had previously protected users against deadnaming and misgendering. Every decision Musk makes is bad for free speech, safety, business. #StopToxicTwitter https://t.co/Blt3EaF9L3
— Nora Benavidez (@AttorneyNora) April 18, 2023
See how it works? Allowing people to speak more freely is “bad for free speech”. Real free speech means forcing people to utter words and phrases that contradict reality and that they themselves don’t even believe.
Orwell, eat your heart out.
Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon had some wise words to say about the saga:
This is an overdue and important update. The old policy treated factually accurate statements as enforceable policy violations. It didn’t merely prohibit harassment; it blocked truth. Gender ideology should be debated, not imposed by force — especially on a “platform for free… https://t.co/yzyEQrogKK
— Seth Dillon (@SethDillon) April 19, 2023
He added, “The idea that trans-identifying people can’t handle even the slightest pushback is horribly condescending. If they respected themselves, they’d be fighting against policies predicated on their fragility.”
Failing that, perhaps they could log off of Twitter and get some fresh air.
___
Originally published at MercatorNet. Photo by John Cameron on Unsplash.
Recent Articles:
4 June 2026
2.7 MINS
Last Thursday, we witnessed something truly remarkable. The Australian Christian Freedom Index (ACFI) launch at Parliament House exceeded even our highest hopes — and God's generosity was unmistakable.
4 June 2026
5.3 MINS
The murder of 18-year-old Henry Nowak has reignited debate over policing, race, multiculturalism, and DEI policies, following allegations that officers prioritized racism claims over a dying victim.
4 June 2026
5.2 MINS
A major new report warns that Christian freedoms in Australia are under increasing pressure, documenting legal restrictions, personal testimonies, and growing concerns about religious liberty.
4 June 2026
11.2 MINS
A major science publisher says the peer-reviewed article on the link between vaccines and SIDS is too dangerous for doctors and parents to read.
4 June 2026
4.2 MINS
The Henry Nowak case exposes declining trust in British policing. Ideological influences risk undermining impartial justice, public confidence, and equal treatment under the law.
4 June 2026
2.1 MINS
The harassment of Helen Mirren in London highlights rising antisemitism, political intimidation, and the distortion of public statements in an increasingly hostile debate over Israel.
3 June 2026
3.3 MINS
A New Zealand gang leader's radical conversion is turning hardened criminals toward Christ — and his own violent past is exactly what makes him the right man for the job.





