Concerns have been raised that Premier Chris Minns may be seeking to limit scrutiny of his government’s recently introduced hate speech laws.
The inquiry is demanding answers about the relationship between hate speech legislation and the January caravan bomb hoax in Dural.
Some critics allege that the government acted on the Dural terrorism threat despite indications it may not have been credible, pushing hate speech laws under the banner of public safety.
NSW Labor did this without genuine regard for debate and the democratic process.
‘Serious and Grave Concerns’: MLC Rod Roberts
Members of the inquiry are concerned about the government’s resistance to full participation in the investigation into the hate speech laws.
8 legislative council (LC) members of the Select Committee are reportedly frustrated by “some witnesses trying to avoid” testifying.
Rod Roberts, who began the investigation, said members had “serious and grave concerns because witnesses were declining to attend, using spurious and tenuous arguments.”
The LC Select Committee comprises NSW Libertarian John Ruddick, one Liberal, three Labor, one National and one Greens member.
Roberts is the chair.
Their concerns are justifiable, wrote leftwing Sydney Criminal Lawyers journalist, Paul Gregoire.
Premier Minns’ Interference
Premier Minns’ interference began the moment he petitioned the Speaker to stop MPs from answering questions.
Minns muddied up the push for transparency, taking issue with the Select Committee’s terms of reference.
In true bureaucratic style, Minns wanted a second committee “to gauge whether the investigation can continue.”
This is because he regards the inquiry’s tone as threatening.
Terms of reference, Minns argued, could “threaten parliamentary privilege of the legislative assembly,” and disrupt the relationship between the Assembly and the Council.
According to Gregoire, the speaker gave Minns a pass.
Subsequently, key staff from the Attorney General, and police minister’s offices told the inquiry they were not available for questioning.
Staffers from the Premier’s office only showed up, Gregoire recalled, because Roberts talked tough and threatened to summon them to the hearing.
Like an upside-down episode of Hogan’s Heroes, the bureaucrats all said they knew nothing.
“Minns is now gearing up to have another committee attempt to end the inquiry,” Gregoire concluded.
An inquiry that is “currently scrutinising his dubious lawmaking actions, in passing a series of laws based on a manufactured antisemitic scare campaign.”
Hasty Hate Speech Law?
The Roberts inquiry into Minns’ hasty hate speech legislation has nine stated goals.
The primary pursuit, Roberts said in a press release on 4 April was “accountability and ensuring the integrity of our parliamentary processes.”
“The public must have confidence that members of Parliament are informed of all available facts before passing legislation,” Roberts asserted.
“This inquiry will investigate whether the hate speech and protest laws were introduced and debated based on misleading or incomplete information.”
With this kind of spotlight, there’s ample reason for why Premier Chris Minns might want the inquiry quashed.
John Ruddick shared some of the second meeting on X, saying he “asked top bureaucrats whether the government rushed through its anti-free speech laws in response to what we now know was a ‘criminal con-job.’”
“They obfuscated, and Labor members got cranky.”
Labor’s Hamletian, ‘doth protest too much’ against Ruddick’s tone during this second sitting, suggests Gregoire’s observations are not all that far off the mark.
___
Originally published at Caldron Pool. Image via YouTube/ABC News.
NSW Premier Chris Minns Accused of Stonewalling Inquiry into Hasty Hate Speech Laws
29 May 2025
2.3 MINS
Concerns have been raised that Premier Chris Minns may be seeking to limit scrutiny of his government’s recently introduced hate speech laws.
The inquiry is demanding answers about the relationship between hate speech legislation and the January caravan bomb hoax in Dural.
Some critics allege that the government acted on the Dural terrorism threat despite indications it may not have been credible, pushing hate speech laws under the banner of public safety.
NSW Labor did this without genuine regard for debate and the democratic process.
‘Serious and Grave Concerns’: MLC Rod Roberts
Members of the inquiry are concerned about the government’s resistance to full participation in the investigation into the hate speech laws.
8 legislative council (LC) members of the Select Committee are reportedly frustrated by “some witnesses trying to avoid” testifying.
Rod Roberts, who began the investigation, said members had “serious and grave concerns because witnesses were declining to attend, using spurious and tenuous arguments.”
The LC Select Committee comprises NSW Libertarian John Ruddick, one Liberal, three Labor, one National and one Greens member.
Roberts is the chair.
Their concerns are justifiable, wrote leftwing Sydney Criminal Lawyers journalist, Paul Gregoire.
Premier Minns’ Interference
Premier Minns’ interference began the moment he petitioned the Speaker to stop MPs from answering questions.
Minns muddied up the push for transparency, taking issue with the Select Committee’s terms of reference.
In true bureaucratic style, Minns wanted a second committee “to gauge whether the investigation can continue.”
This is because he regards the inquiry’s tone as threatening.
Terms of reference, Minns argued, could “threaten parliamentary privilege of the legislative assembly,” and disrupt the relationship between the Assembly and the Council.
According to Gregoire, the speaker gave Minns a pass.
Subsequently, key staff from the Attorney General, and police minister’s offices told the inquiry they were not available for questioning.
Staffers from the Premier’s office only showed up, Gregoire recalled, because Roberts talked tough and threatened to summon them to the hearing.
Like an upside-down episode of Hogan’s Heroes, the bureaucrats all said they knew nothing.
“Minns is now gearing up to have another committee attempt to end the inquiry,” Gregoire concluded.
An inquiry that is “currently scrutinising his dubious lawmaking actions, in passing a series of laws based on a manufactured antisemitic scare campaign.”
Hasty Hate Speech Law?
The Roberts inquiry into Minns’ hasty hate speech legislation has nine stated goals.
The primary pursuit, Roberts said in a press release on 4 April was “accountability and ensuring the integrity of our parliamentary processes.”
“The public must have confidence that members of Parliament are informed of all available facts before passing legislation,” Roberts asserted.
With this kind of spotlight, there’s ample reason for why Premier Chris Minns might want the inquiry quashed.
John Ruddick shared some of the second meeting on X, saying he “asked top bureaucrats whether the government rushed through its anti-free speech laws in response to what we now know was a ‘criminal con-job.’”
“They obfuscated, and Labor members got cranky.”
Labor’s Hamletian, ‘doth protest too much’ against Ruddick’s tone during this second sitting, suggests Gregoire’s observations are not all that far off the mark.
___
Originally published at Caldron Pool. Image via YouTube/ABC News.
About the Author: Rod Lampard
Australia / COMMENTARY / Fairness & Justice
SHARE >
We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.
Fake news and censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate now.
Recent Articles:
How to Identify as a Christian on the Census When the ABS Gives You No Box to Tick
5 August 2026
6.9 MINS
Census night is less than a week away, and the religion question is more confusing than it should be. Here’s exactly how Christians — practising or not — should answer it, and why the ABS’s design deserves scrutiny.
Should the West Be Suspicious of Islam? The Oxford University Debate
5 August 2026
2.3 MINS
What happens when the side arguing 'the West shouldn't be suspicious of Islam' essentially tells their opponents: 'Be nice to us or the mob outside will get you'? An Oxford debate provides the answer.
Loopy Liberal Wished Berlin Pride Attacker Was a ‘White Christian’ Not an Arab Muslim
5 August 2026
3.8 MINS
The Berlin Pride attack has reignited questions about ideology, truth and prejudice, exposing how political narratives can distort public reactions and deepen suspicion towards Christianity.
How Can We Flourish as Death Approaches?
5 August 2026
3.4 MINS
A new study finds people with multiple myeloma need more than medical treatment, urging doctors to address patients’ emotional, psychological, and spiritual needs alongside clinical care, in the face of impending death.
AI Worship Music: Why Christians Should Care
4 August 2026
5.2 MINS
How do you feel about listening to music that's been made totally through machine learning? Does it matter if you can't tell if it was made by a human or AI? Could the lyrics and emotion still resonate with you? Now, what about AI music made to worship God, or spread the Christian message — does it actually matter?
In Their Own Words: 30 Islamist Declarations of Intent to Dominate the West
4 August 2026
9.1 MINS
Thirty Muslims living in the West have made their intentions crystal clear. They've announced their plans to dominate your country, replace your values, and transform your way of life — all on camera, in their own words. They're not hiding their Islamic agenda. The question is: When will we start believing them?
Anthony Fauci’s Private Diary and Emails Show He Knew Lockdowns Failed
4 August 2026
6.6 MINS
Newly released emails and diary entries reignite debate over Anthony Fauci's pandemic leadership, exposing stark contrasts between his public statements and private assessments.
Use your voice today to protect
Faith · Family · Freedom · Life
MOST POPULAR
ABOUT
The Daily Declaration is an Australian Christian news site dedicated to providing a voice for Christian values in the public square. Our vision is to see the revitalisation of our Judeo-Christian values for the common good. We are non-profit, independent, crowdfunded, and provide Christian news for a growing audience across Australia, Asia, and the South Pacific. The opinions of our contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of The Daily Declaration. Read More.
MOST COMMENTS
GOOD NEWS
HALL OF FAME
BROWSE TOPICS
BROWSE GENRES