Australia’s Largest Christian News Site

The media has talked for months about enshrining the Voice to Parliament and Executive Government into the constitution. A shrine is something you worship at. What are we meant to worship?

Despite its relatively short length, Voice Treaty Truth contains a wealth of information and background. It is a soul-searching read that will prove vital for the days, weeks and months ahead.

If successful, the Voice will introduce a race-based or ancestry/heritage-based body into the constitution, which is therefore discriminatory and goes against the equality of law in a democracy.

I appreciate your passion, Rev. Costello, in prosecuting your case for the ‘Yes’ campaign. But all things considered, I believe my duty as a Christian is to vote ‘No’.

Years of work for reconciliation and to build a multicultural cohesive society in Australia are at risk with the Voice referendum. I explain cultural Marxism and why I am voting no at the referendum.

The Uluru Statement envisages that with “substantive constitutional change and structural reform”, “two sovereignties [can] co-exist”.

The Uluru Statement makes use of the term “spiritual sovereignty”, which “serves as the rallying point of those who want to entrench the Voice in the Constitution”.

The Albanese Labor Government’s hypocrisy about promoting ‘a voice’ is utterly disgraceful. They have shown themselves to be totally incapable of hearing what the Indigenous people are saying or speaking about.

Are you thinking biblically about the upcoming Voice referendum? Here are three articles from each side of the debate to help make an informed decision.

I am voting ‘No’ to the Voice because of the pagan culture that the proponents of the Voice are seeking to impose on Australian society.

This paper aims to assist Sydney Anglicans in understanding and taking seriously the case for voting ‘yes’ in the planned referendum this year.

Among so many of Australia’s church leaders, on the profoundly important issues of Indigenous injustice, we find caution rather than courage.

I think the Voice will fail, and I think that it will be in the interests of Aboriginal Australians ultimately for it to fail, because I fear the consequences.

The Voice proposal seeks to provide certain rights to a group of citizens solely because they are Indigenous or First Nations peoples.

We want to get a good car into the hands of a good man (Ps Peter Walker) so he can continue to do the good work he's been doing for 40 years.

A speech Senator Nampijinpa Price gave last week has been called “powerful”, “transformational”, and a “turning point” for Australia.

The Voice is being promoted by those who are living off our peoples’ miseries. They are the educated, confident ones who constantly blame kardiya for our problems and do all they can to keep voices like mine unheard.

The Indigenous Leaders Car Appeal is already helping fuel gospel ministry. Can you help with further needs?

The Voice referendum reveals some interesting dimensions of contemporary Australian culture that are being obscured by the political debate.

I became very concerned about whether the Voice was in the national interest. After reading and listening and canvassing ideas, I’ve come to the firmly held view that the last thing that Australia can afford is a solution described as the Voice.