Barrett Didn’t Have to Apologise – Homosexuality is not Innate
“Judge Barrett did not have to apologise at all for using the expression ‘sexual preference,’” said Ruth Institute President Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D., “Homosexuality is not innate.”
Morse was commenting on an exchange in the course of Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation hearing. Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) objected to Barrett’s use of the expression (in regard to Obergefell v. Hodges) which she said was “offensive to the LGBT community,” whereupon Barrett apologised.
Morse remarked:
“The LGBT community, so-called, can take offense at anything they want. We certainly can’t stop them. However, science has now proven beyond doubt that there is no ‘gay gene.’ Whatever combination of nature and nurture, choice and chance, may be at work for any particular person’s situation, hard genetic determinism is certainly not correct.”
She added:
“Self-identifying as ‘gay’ or ‘lesbian’ or ‘transgender’ is certainly a choice. Living a sexually active life with partners of the same sex is a choice, in fact, a whole series of choices.
“Unfortunately, we now have science by interest-group intimidation,” Morse charged.
In a commentary on a study in the August 30, 2019 issue of the publication Science, Fr. D. Paul Sullins, Ph.D., the Ruth Institute’s Senior Research Associate, remarked that the study “explodes the false narrative that being gay is an innate condition that is controlled or largely compelled by one’s genetic makeup.”
“Rebutting decades of search by LGBT scientists for a ‘gay gene,’ the study’s first author flatly concludes ‘it will be basically impossible to predict one’s sexual activity or orientation from genetics.’”
Morse added:
“But this false narrative of gay at birth, or homosexuality as an innate condition, was the basis for the Supreme Court’s decision mandating same-sex marriage in Obergefell. That’s why the LGBT movement and its apologists become hysterical at the suggestion that homosexual behavior is a choice, implied in the expression ‘sexual preference.’ For the Sexual State, there’s so much at stake here.
“Ironically, the same politicians who say ‘listen to the scientists’ when it comes to COVID, are saying ‘Don’t listen to the scientists; listen to us,’ when it comes to homosexuality.”
On June 5, 2020, Morse interviewed Dr. Walter Schumm of Kansas State University on efforts to silence research on gay issues.
[Photo: BigStock]Recent Articles:
21 October 2026
7.9 MINS
A collection of sobering reflections on Western civilisation’s decline, the loss of Christian foundations and the dangers of cultural complacency, ending with a message of enduring Christian hope.
20 October 2026
7.7 MINS
France and Europe are burning — is it too late to save them from the barbarians?
20 October 2026
4.6 MINS
As rioters burn cars and historical buildings, celebrating the destruction of France’s inheritance, the West confronts an uncomfortable question: what happens when a civilisation loses the will to defend itself?
20 October 2026
4.9 MINS
A federal investigation has exposed how America’s biggest banks shut out conservative and Christian clients, relying on subjective reputation risks and controversial ideological watchdogs.
19 October 2026
6.7 MINS
Europe’s escalating unrest raises urgent questions about immigration, national identity, secularism and the decline of Christian influence, prompting calls for repentance, prayer and renewed leadership.
19 October 2026
2.7 MINS
The UK Greens’ vote to define Zionism as racism has exposed deep divisions within the party, raising questions about its future leadership and political direction.
16 October 2026
4 MINS
Katie Zacharia’s first days as White House Press Secretary have sparked fierce media criticism, but her remarkable testimony of surviving an abortion attempt tells a deeper story.
