Gay Couple Wanting a Son Sue IVF Clinic When They Get a Daughter
But isn’t gender a social construct?
A gay couple is suing a California fertility clinic after they requested a male embryo but ended up with a baby girl.
I know what you’re thinking. You’re thinking, ‘Can’t they just be happy with a healthy child?’
Well, no. They regarded this as a purchase.
They should have tried Walmart.
All Planned Out
CBS News reported that gay couple Albert and Anthony Saniger were determined to be fathers to two sons.
They’d chosen names for their future children and (insert creepy music here) even created Gmail accounts for them.
The Sanigers reportedly made it clear to the IVF providers that they wanted a male embryo implanted in their surrogate. (Would you like fries with that?)
I suspect what they were looking for was not a child, but a mini-me.
The surrogate gave birth to a healthy baby girl.
Cue gay outrage.
Disappointment
The angry men launched a lawsuit claiming that the fertility clinic …
“Negligently, recklessly, and/or intentionally transferred a female embryo to the Sanigers’ gestational carrier.”
The men are seeking damages, citing the $300,000 cost of the fertility process, as well as the cost of raising three children instead of two, as they still plan to have, by which I of course mean ‘procure’, two sons.
All of this seems rather unnecessary though, don’t you think?
Haven’t we been told that children are non-binary at birth until they decide if they’re a boy or a girl?
So I don’t see how our two gay men can even presume to know the sex of the newborn baby.
Peak Trans
Surely they can but wait until the child tells them its gender. Otherwise, they are assuming the gender. And that’s a big no-no, right?
Just on that, what if they had gotten a son and the son decided he was a girl? Who would our gay couple sue then?
Anyway, rather than take legal action, why don’t our LGBTQ friends simply get the gender fairies to create a TikTok clip baptising the child into whatever gender they conjure. Nothing that some puberty blockers and a bit of surgery down the track couldn’t make sweet.
I realise I’m being crass. But the whole thing is crass.
Consumerist
Next they’ll sue because they wanted a gay child and got a straight one!
This choose-your-own-reality business is getting out of hand. If you really want a puppy, don’t get a baby.
But what this story ultimately demonstrates is that LGBTQ radicals aren’t so woke that they are incapable of recognising truth.
They know gender is a fixed biological reality.
They just pretend otherwise when it suits, for the purpose of waging ideological war on their enemies.
___
Originally published at The James Macpherson Report.
Subscribe to his Substack here for daily witty commentary.
Photo: Pixabay
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
18 April 2025
5.4 MINS
New research shows an alarming trend: as people become more progressive, they’re more likely to abandon Christianity. Here’s what that means for churches today.
18 April 2025
5.8 MINS
Australia is at a spiritual crossroads. The same demonic forces that seduced ancient Israel — Baal, Molech, and Ashtoreth — appear to be rising again. How should we respond?
18 April 2025
3.7 MINS
Bold New South Wales churches will openly refuse to comply with the state’s atrocious Conversion Practices Ban Act 2024. Caldron Pool editor Ben Davis said the Open Windows declaration began with pastors concerned about the legislation being weaponised against Christians.
18 April 2025
6.2 MINS
Over the past few days, there have been at least three terrific wins when it comes to the gender wars, the sexual revolutionaries, and protecting women. Three nations have seen significant victories for some sexual sanity in the culture wars, with the radical trans agenda being given a few big hits.
17 April 2025
1.6 MINS
This week I was in court for the ninth time! This was the second case of alleged vilification. Women are being erased in sport, spaces and sex-based services. All because politicians refuse to correct the mistake of Julia Gillard, who removed our protections in law back in 2013.
17 April 2025
5 MINS
For years, I’ve resisted deploying the word globalism with approbation because international cooperation is a good thing. Travel is glorious, and so is the freedom to trade and migrate. How did the practice of freedom as it extends over national juridical lines come to be so widely loathed and disparaged?
Like very much….still laughing because it beats crying ….and have shared!