The New Yes Campaign Ad That Peddles Wild Disinformation
Albanese Cabinet ministers are spreading disinformation, sharing a Yes Campaign ad falsely claiming Indigenous Australians have been ignored for 250 years. Where are the fact-checkers when you need them?
Someone tell the hand-wringing bureaucrats paid to whine endlessly about misinformation and disinformation about the new Yes campaign ad.
Unveiled on Tuesday night, the 30-second television commercial tells a fib that might just take out top spot for the biggest lie of the referendum debate thus far.
Worst of all, Yes23, the organisation behind the ad, plans on spending $20 million to broadcast their blatant disinformation into living rooms all over the country.
The commercial begins with a montage of scenes depicting the lives of ordinary Australians, and explains:
Listening works. Teams listen to their coaches. Children listen to their parents, well, some of the time. When we listen, we understand. When we understand, we can help.
Then comes the bold-faced fib:
But for the last 250 years we haven’t listened to the people who have been here for 65,000. It’s time we did.
Listening works. But for the last 250 years, we haven't listened to the people who have been here for 65,000.
It's time we did. Vote Yes on October 14.#yes23 pic.twitter.com/hd0ixZP4BG
— Yes23 (@yes23au) September 24, 2023
Fact-Checking the Yes Campaign’s Disinformation
It’s a sad truth that Australia treated Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders unjustly by not listening to them — by excluding them from the political process — for far too long.
There were exceptions to this rule. In South Australia, for instance, Aboriginal men were given the right to vote with the passing of the state’s Constitution in 1856. That right was extended to women, including Aboriginal women, in 1895.
A patchwork of laws across the other states and territories variously restricted — and eventually allowed — Indigenous Australians access to the ballot box and to political office.
Finally, the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1962 gave all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander the right vote in federal elections. All remaining political inequalities were subsequently removed under the Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Act 1983.
Yes, some of these reforms were far too slow in coming. But to claim — in 2023 — that “for the last 250 years we haven’t listened to” Indigenous Australians is a breathtaking fabrication of history.
The claim doesn’t just unfairly accuse non-Indigenous Australians of indifference. It also insults the intelligence of Indigenous Australians who know better, while stoking unwarranted anger for those who don’t.
Further alienation is the last thing Australia’s Indigenous people need.
Disinformation No Matter Which Way You Dice It
In case the Yes23 commercial was referring to issues beyond just the political rights of Indigenous Australians, let’s zoom out.
Today, there are hundreds of native title bodies, dozens of land councils, and over 120 other Indigenous agencies that advise Australian governments on issues affecting Indigenous people.
Representing all of these voices in unison is the National Indigenous Australians Agency, which reports directly to the executive branch of government: the Prime Minister’s Cabinet.
In 2008, history was made with the National Apology, in which the Australian Government issued a formal apology to Indigenous Australians for the forcible removal of Indigenous children by its agencies.
In 2014, the new Australian Curriculum was launched, with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories and cultures as one of its three “cross-curriculum priorities” — that is, topics that must inform every school subject. This has ensured Indigenous issues are front and centre for all Aussie school kids for the last decade.
Every year, no fewer than a dozen significant Indigenous dates are marked on Australia’s calendar and commemorated in various ways.
Today, Australia has 11 Indigenous members of parliament in Canberra, making Indigenous “voices” statistically overrepresented on Capital Hill (that is, if we assume people can only be represented by those of their own race).
Even after all of these developments, Yes23 maintains that “for the last 250 years we haven’t listened to” Indigenous Australians.
Why the lie? And why no pushback against the disinformation from the powers that be?
Where Are the Fact Checkers When You Need Them?
The Australian Code of Practice on Disinformation and Misinformation was published in February 2021. It is a voluntary code, overseen by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), whose aim is “to provide safeguards against harms from the spread of disinformation and misinformation on digital platforms”.
According to the code, misinformation is digital content “that is verifiably false or misleading or deceptive”. “Some misinformation is deliberately spread — this is called disinformation,” ACMA further explains.
The Albanese Government infamously hopes to etch such a code into law through its deeply unpopular, proposed Misinformation Bill.
For proof that Labor’s attempt to combat disinformation and misinformation is little more than a cynical ploy to silence political dissent, look no further than their response to the Yes campaign’s latest ad.
If the Albanese Government was serious about stopping the spread of disinformation, they would demand the removal of the latest Yes23 commercial.
Instead, Albanese Cabinet members like Linda Burney and Tanya Plibersek are reposting the ad, proudly disseminating disinformation — deliberately false, misleading and deceptive claims — to hundreds of thousands of users online.
Will ACMA act? Where are RMIT ABC Fact Check, AAP FactCheck or AFP Fact Check when you need them? Will anyone be held to account?
We’ll wait.
5 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
20 May 2024
3.3 MINS
The latest bombshell revelation about gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab comes amid a crackdown on “misinformation and disinformation” by the Albanese Government.
20 May 2024
3.7 MINS
The NSW Equality Bill proposes to remove the few existing protections for religious institutions from anti-discrimination lawfare, including schools, healthcare, aged care, welfare and pastoral services, while offering no protections at all for individuals of faith.
20 May 2024
2.4 MINS
Meet Chris Elston, a Canadian father of two girls, who has gained prominence for his work advocating to protect children from harmful medical transitioning practices like puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries, through conversations sparked by his billboards around the world.
20 May 2024
2.8 MINS
As we focus on the Great Commission, let’s remember that a part of this command is to teach well about Jesus Christ and His Church. Knowledge that is relevant and transforms a person into a mature disciple.
19 May 2024
3.2 MINS
The full assurance of hope acts as an “anchor” for our soul (Heb 6:19). Full assurance acts as a catalyst that sets our hearts immovably on Christ Jesus.
18 May 2024
3.6 MINS
For this National Day of Prayer, our focus is to be still before God (Psalm 46:10). Why? Because this will aid us in being more fruitful in making disciples of Jesus.
17 May 2024
2 MINS
Australia passed its Digital ID bill in the Lower House yesterday, green-lighting the implementation of the legislative framework for the expansion of the Australian Government's Digital ID system.
God PLEASE help the people WAKE UP!!!
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
“Will ACMA act?” – No.
“Where are RMIT ABC Fact Check, AAP FactCheck or AFP Fact Check when you need them? Will anyone be held to account?” – In the tank for Yes23.
Very true but very sad!!!!!
In totalitarian countries there is only one “Truth ” (eg Putin’s and Xi’s ), no dissent is allowed and religion is persecuted or under the control of the State which promotes leaders and ideology favourable to the regime. Unless we resist now by voting “No ” to “The Voice” it is the beginning of the end of Australia’s democracy ie of our freedoms with this proposed Misinformation Law.
To attempt to change something as valuable as our Constitution on the basis of such lies is unconscionable!