
Scrubbed: My Whistleblowing Exposure of Our Defence Intelligence Has Been Erased from the Internet
The well-researched Daily Declaration article “They are Scrubbing the Internet Right Now”, written by Jeffrey A Tucker and Debbie Lerman, hit very close to home.
So I’ve decided to share my experience.
Between 2009 and 2013, I led the team of whistleblowers who exposed what was then the greatest intelligence scandal in Australia’s history. It’s still a scandal!
In light of the proposed Communications Legislation Amendment (Combating Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024 (MAD Bill), my testimony of government-enforced ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’ is, it seems, a message that our government does not want anyone to remember.
Scrubbed!
Last year, my Defence whistleblowing experience was listed on Wikipedia. Anyone could look me up and follow the links to my proofs. This year, I have been removed from that list.
Last year, everyone/anyone could find the public IGIS report titled, “Inquiry into allegations of inappropriate vetting practices by the Defence Security Authority and related matters”.
This year I can’t find it. The link has been removed.
Last year, I could still find references to, “The Three Defence Whistleblowers” on Google. This year, I can’t find any references.
Politically Incorrect
Fighting (and winning) a battle against enforced and entrenched misinformation took around three years because Defence, their department heads, lawyers, ministers and the media were involved in a massive cover-up. They didn’t want the information we three whistleblowers leaked ‘out there’.
They didn’t want anyone to know they had been routinely enforcing the entry of false data into people’s files to facilitate approval for secret and top-secret clearances.
Their ‘misinformation’ shredded ASIO’s ability to know which clearances were legitimate and which were bogus. The investigation was handed over to the Investigator General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS).
The IGIS is the highest judicial authority in Australia, higher than the High Court. As such, it has no appeal system. Every decision is final. Every recommendation is an order.
The IGIS sits directly under the Governor General, and each investigation has the power of a Royal Commission. Information from these proceedings can only be released to the Senate and public at the direction of the Prime Minister.
After a six-month investigation, the IGIS report revealed that our national security was savaged to such a degree that they deemed the problem ‘unfixable’!
Now that’s serious in anyone’s language. But now, it has been covered up again. Scrubbed!
My Documented Experience
It’s a good thing I wrote my experience in a book.
It’s also a good thing that I have kept hard copy evidence of the IGIS report, the letter of apology from the Secretary of Defence that the IGIS ordered him to write, files of newspaper articles, and other assorted hard evidence.
I have put the outline of this important historical event in a short video, called “National Scandal”. This story is not going to be scrubbed! It has already been picked up by people in New Zealand, Canada, the US and Russia.
This historical event is the most damning argument we have against the dangerous notion of allowing government bodies to decide what is ‘misinformation or disinformation’.
They ordered staff to put false information into people’s personal files!
Does it get any worse than that?
Lockdowns, rubber bullets, and callous brutality showed us how far our government was prepared to go to force their will onto ordinary Australians. Yes, it can get worse.
Unless we stop it.
Understanding the 70/30
My experience with the Defence Intelligence and Security Authority (DSA) between 2009 and 2012 revealed some interesting social data:
- With strong coercion, 70% of staff were willing to submit to a communist-style totalitarian regime. And worse, some of those were more than willing to become vicious enforcers of extreme authoritarianism.
- Meanwhile, 30% of staff objected to the brutally enforced corruption. 25% quietly and covertly supported a bold and outspoken 5%.
- Despite the odds, the 5% WON!
During COVID, governments knew that around 70% of the population would buckle under, give up their freedom and accept their new totalitarian rule. Some would even join forces with the bullies against those who dared object to having their freedoms stolen. Their biggest challenge would be shutting down the other 30% – and especially the 5%. Hence, the bullying, intimidation and terror tactics!
They knew the 5% had the power to stop them. We did! We still do! So, now they are rolling out the MAD Bill.
The MAD Bill is not yet in force but seems to be a ‘given’ since information is already being quickly erased, removed, buried and controlled.
What Can We Do?
In the midst of all this, it helps to remember that everything political bullies do ultimately fails. History tells us that people power is always stronger than political power. Always!
Right now, I suggest two points of action.
First, keep hard copies of everything because the information they are deleting now will eventually need to be re-entered. Yes! They will fail!
Second, keep those political objections going. Remember, there are only 700 politicians in Australia and they are not the source of all wisdom.
Ordinary people can and always do make a huge difference!
___
Photo by Adobe.
4 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
2 September 2026
3.8 MINS
Rachel Wilson’s "Occult Feminism" has sparked fierce debate over feminism’s historical roots, Christianity’s role, and the ideological forces shaping modern womanhood.
2 September 2026
4.5 MINS
Political opponents can be criticised without being demonised. The rhetoric surrounding Pauline Hanson risks turning legitimate political disagreement into something far more dangerous.
2 September 2026
1.6 MINS
The Secret Harbour by-election has exposed a major shift in Australian politics, opening new opportunities for minor parties and Christian voices grounded in biblical values.
2 September 2026
5.7 MINS
A new HHS-commissioned study finds notable correlations between left-wing authoritarian attitudes, transgender-affirming beliefs, and support for political violence — though researchers caution the data cannot establish which factor causes which.
1 September 2026
3.3 MINS
Labor's new Digital Duty of Care promises to protect Australians online — but critics warn it's a rebranded censorship push that could silence political dissent, faith voices and the pro-life movement.
1 September 2026
2.3 MINS
Adam Bandt has found a new culprit for bird flu: climate change. But as scientists have linked everything from turbulence to potholes to global warming, is this just the latest stretch in an increasingly elastic explanation?
31 August 2026
3.9 MINS
Sydney sociologist Salvatore Babones argues Pauline Hanson was onto something — monoculturalism, not multiculturalism, is what actually helps immigrants assimilate and thrive, while Europe's approach has failed spectacularly.






I believe that the name of the bill is enough to show that it is bad. Orwellian double speak of ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’ is incredibly concerning. lt feels like someone read 1984 as a oppression guide.
It is MAD and it’s BAD. I’m still waiting for my weekly “Please Explain” newsletter from Pauline Hanson (PHON). It was due on Friday… No, I don’t agree with everything Pauline says but the Queenslanders think she’s great and she CARES for them. Calling Freedom of Opinion!
Good advice –keep hard copies of everything as we can’t trust the politicians and bureaucrats. I have personal experience of what happened in my case in 1984. Now it is virtually impossible to find a digital reference to my cause celebre FOI court case . Also, the reporting omitted what it was really about– Sexual Harassment . It omitted , too, in the reporting , that justice to the individual (me ) overrode government’s argument that a victory for me would endanger the security of Australia. Today it seems we are all presumed to be enemies ofthe State , while the people who are the real danger to our country are protected. A sad state of affairs. For now we still have a few decent politicians who are aware of the dangers to our freedoms, but, they may be gone after the next elections as the government has already made financial enducements to win votes .
It clear to see that it’s not ‘misinformation’ or ‘disinformation’ that is being erased; it is information that is inconvenient to the political agenda that is being scrubbed – historically true information. This not a conspiracy theory or an unfounded fear. It is happening in front of our faces. We can see it happening. Are we going to let it continue, or will we do something about it?