
Charlie Kirk: Don’t Have Empathy, Have Compassion
Charlie Kirk is quoted as having said, “I can’t stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that does a lot of damage… Sympathy I prefer more than empathy. That’s a separate topic for a different time.”
Some have invoked the first part of this quote to rationalise a disturbing lack of concern for Charlie’s death, reasoning, “Charlie didn’t believe in empathy! So why should I have empathy for him now?”
Charlie said this particular line between talking about the manipulation and dishonesty of politicians, referring to how empathy is used as a way to appeal to voter emotions. Politicians and activists throw it around to sound virtuous, but it’s often handled with the sentiment “agree with me or you don’t care” looming ominously in the background. This is similar to the modern use and abuse of the word “tolerance”.
Now, we wonder, what would he have said if he’d continued to justify his view on “empathy”? We cannot know exactly what he would have said. It certainly seems like he had more to say, but he stopped himself from the tangential thought and returned to his original point. Maybe Charlie disliked the word “empathy” simply because it’s overused and often misused?
In Their Shoes
In my search for more context, I found one lady who claimed to finish his thought. She said, “Empathy means you feel what another person felt, and nobody can feel what another person felt.” This brought back memories of a high school version of myself who had that very same criticism of the concept of empathy: put yourselves in their shoes? You can’t! How can I take comfort in another person’s presumptuous and futile attempt to imagine being in my situation?
There really is a sense in which this is a New Age concept. The term empath is common in New Age spirituality, and describes a person who can “tune into” other people’s emotions, vibes, or energies. It can even be associated with astral projection and feeling into their “aura”.
Empathy also risks collapsing into self-reference: “I know how you feel because I remember that the same thing happened to me and I was devastated.” The earlier aesthetics term, Einfühlung, which empathy is derived from, is inherently self-referential, referring to the way a person might project their own feelings into an artwork.
In that sense, I suppose empathy has the potential to be the disingenuous and selfish version of its much older counterpart, “sympathy”. Sympathy recognises the emotion, and expresses condolences, but doesn’t claim to know how you feel. But this can risk feeling distant or unsupportive.
The pinnacle of these interrelational emotions must be “compassion”. Charlie says this himself. Compassion recognises the emotion, then stretches out its hand and offers to help. It both acknowledges the suffering and moves toward alleviating it.
Empathy and sympathy are like faith without deeds, a fig tree without figs. Compassion is not only the feeling, but also the motivating desire to help. It’s not just an emotional buzzword; it’s a commitment to serve.
Moved to Action
It should come as no surprise that, out of the three, the concept of compassion appears in Scripture the most. Jesus explicitly shows compassion several times in the New Testament. Rachamim and Splagchnizomai are often translated to “compassion”.
The next most common concept is sympathy, represented by words like “comfort, mourn, bear one another’s burdens”. While empathy, in the modern sense, does not seem to have much of a presence in Scripture. The Greek root of both empathy and sympathy is the term Sympatheo, though sympathy does not carry the additional baggage of Einfühlung.
Christians are called to something stronger: not just to feel or imagine another’s suffering, but to respond with compassion and act in ways that reflect the will of God.
Of course, we can’t know whether this is the rationale Charlie had kept to himself. Maybe it was more elaborate, or far simpler. I’m sure there were so many more profound insights that Charlie had packed into his head – insights that only Erika might’ve been privy to.
So, to my readers: Have compassion. Do something. Speak out.
God bless and comfort the Kirk family. The human race has truly been robbed.
___
Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
9 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
5 October 2026
4.9 MINS
Free Speech Union co-founder Reuben Kirkham warns Australia’s proposed Digital Duty of Care could expand censorship powers, undermine free expression and bypass recent legal protections.
5 October 2026
7.3 MINS
DJ, composer and trance music icon, Tyson Illingworth aka tyDi shares his testimony in coming (back) to Christ in this exclusive interview with Aaron Duff from Australian Christian Records.
5 October 2026
3.7 MINS
The Albanese Government promised cheaper coffee by banning card surcharges. Instead, the costs simply moved into higher prices — leaving Australians paying for a saving that never existed.
5 October 2026
6.8 MINS
A closer examination of Candace Owens’ evolving arguments asks whether conspiracy thinking can distort our ability to process evidence, and what Romans 1 teaches Christians.
5 October 2026
3 MINS
The Church is the salt of the earth. But if salt becomes tasteless, it is useless — and thrown out.
4 October 2026
3.5 MINS
As children of the day, let us live freely out of our identity and awaken those around us from spiritual sleep. We carry more than faith for a great awakening — we are the awakeners.
3 October 2026
3.7 MINS
The Church is called to be counter-cultural not to be merely contrarian, but because we love God and people. In this world, that will mean going against culture that is contrary to God.






I learned this in High School and have never forgotten it
There is a difference between “sentiment” and “sentimentality”
Sentiment is a natural response to things and people we hold dear
Sentimentality is used to appeal to a knee jerk reaction that does not require thought or logic.
We see it used more and more as a tool to weaken the vulnerable
Great article Trinity!!!
It’s interesting that the word empathy seems to have changed in meaning so that it no longer means to come alongside. Obviously we can’t know how anyone else feels regardless of whatever we’ve been through ourselves. My personal perspective: Sympathy is problematic because it can encourage a pity party whereas compassion comes alongside, listens well and is quietly there for the one in need.
Love this piece Trinity, thank you!
If you can’t have empathy, sympathy or compassion for others then you will fall into the mire of selfish behavior which is ultimately hollow and self destructive. Having care for others opens your heart and mind. Which frees your soul. That sounds like a better path to me.
It would have been great if Charlie Kirk showed either empathy or compassion, but he was too busy misrepresenting Christianity, promoting sexism and defending gun violence.
if God said love your enemies what do you need gun for ? what about put your sword and those who …. sword will definitely Charlie dead by the sword he was fighting all his life. that was Jesus teaching
Context. There were bandits/robbers on the road so Jesus advised to be armed. In the right place/time protect yourself.
Luke 22:36 Then He said to them, “But now, he who has a money bag, let him take it, and likewise a knapsack; and he who has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one.”
It’s interesting, the way words can be manipulated to support belief systems. I’m 54 and I was educated to understand sympathy to mean feeling care and pity for someone going through something for which you have no relevant experience or point of reference. Whereas empathy meant acknowledging the impact of their experience by relating a similar experience of your own or contemplating in depth how you would feel under similar circumstances. The difference between the two being your position of ‘standing by or standing beside”. In this way, Charlie Kirk’s claims are indicative of an inability to relate to or consider another person’s experiences as having equal value or legitimacy to his own.