The Safeguards in Victoria’s Assisted Dying Law are Being Skittled
Australia’s first, safest, and most conservative voluntary assisted dying scheme is booming. In Victoria, demand has skyrocketed, and the Labor government plans to loosen safeguards and make it easier for even more people to access services.
Figures from the annual report of the Voluntary Assisted Dying Review Board show that 389 people died in the 2024-25 year. The total of deaths in Victoria since VAD was launched in 2019 is 1,683.
The annual report, released in September, says that there are almost no problems with VAD in Victoria – except that not enough people are dying.
“Barriers to timely access and concerns around program sustainability remain,” says the report.
“Addressing these matters is essential to realising compassionate end-of-life care for more Victorians.”
This is a far cry from assurances that former Premier Dan Andrews gave the state in 2017, when the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act passed. “We anticipate in the first 12 months, based on overseas experience, around a dozen people that will access voluntary assisted dying,” he predicted at a press conference.
“And we would think that number will settle at around a 100, a 150 per year in the years after.”
Time for a reality check.
In the first 12 months of the legislation, from 19 June 2019 to 30 June 2020, 124 people died. That’s about a dozen per month, not a dozen per year. So much for 100 to 150 deaths per year.
More Deaths Required
The review board is fretting about its capacity for meeting rising demand for the services of VAD doctors.
“In 2024–25, the Board received an unprecedented 837 requests for voluntary assisted dying (VAD),” it says.
“As community awareness continues to grow, the Board anticipates this will rise significantly. Projections indicate there may be around 1,300 requests each year by 2028. This growth means Victoria will need to adjust the way it supports the system through which VAD requests proceed.”
“Adjusting” means loosening the safeguards which Premier Andrews once boasted were the best in the world.
Since the Victorian law was passed in 2017, every other state and the ACT has passed its own VAD legislation, each a bit more liberal than the last. Victoria is being left behind – and it’s downright humiliating.
“The uptake of VAD in Victoria is significantly lower than in most other states,” complains the review board.
Reducing Rights
With this in mind, it has recommended 13 amendments to the 2017 legislation. They include the following measures:
- Doctors should be free to persuade patients of the benefits of VAD so that they can make “a fully informed decision” about their end-of-life choices. (The review board seems to have forgotten that Premier Andrews said: “There can be no coercion, doctors can’t suggest this – patients have to ask for it.”)
- Nursing homes should be stripped of the right to refuse to host VAD.
- Conscientious objection should be discouraged because it is not compassionate and disrespects patient autonomy. “Obstruction, inaction or discouragement by medical practitioners in response to a person’s request for more information about VAD is inconsistent with patient-centred treatment,” it states.
- The time in which the patient is expected to die should be extended from six months to 12 months. Doctors should be able to approve VAD requests over a Zoom call.
In 2017, Premier Andrew boasted that: “This legislation will deliver the safest model in the world, with the most stringent checks and balances.”
Safeguards? Andrews proudly declared in 2017 that 68 of them guaranteed the safety of vulnerable Victorians. One by one, they are being stripped away. How many will be left after Victoria revises its “historic” legislation? How many Victorians will die?
___
Republished with thanks to The Catholic Weekly. Image courtesy of Adobe.
4 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
17 July 2026
15.2 MINS
The Church is wimpy, and it's destroying the nation. That's the blunt assessment of Rev. Chris Wickland, a UK clergyman who refuses to soften the gospel for perceived cultural acceptance. And he has a point. From the rise of "woke" institutional Christianity to the abdication of prophetic witness, the modern Church has traded its backbone for a desperate attempt to attain a disappearing seat at the table.
17 July 2026
4.5 MINS
Landlords have shut the door on the LGBTQ+ desecration of a former Sydney Catholic Church and theatre named after saints.
17 July 2026
3.8 MINS
Jillian Spencer, a Queensland psychiatrist suspended for questioning childhood gender treatments, has been cleared by AHPRA, as her hospital prepares to release its own statement.
17 July 2026
4 MINS
In a sign of the continuing breakdown of religious freedom in Europe, Finnish parliament member Päivi Räsänen was banned by the U.K. from traveling to Heathrow Airport for a planned layover due to her Finnish Supreme Court conviction in March for authoring a pamphlet containing supposed “hate speech” toward those who identify as LGBT.
17 July 2026
2.9 MINS
Questions on the environment produced the most lopsided results of any category tested, with every single model favouring climate concerns over growth. Removing one model’s “safety” layer moved its religion score from secular-leaning to neutral.
17 July 2026
4.7 MINS
As tensions between America and Iran escalate, foreign policy experts urge discernment in distinguishing between regimes that keep their word and those — like Tehran — that operate through deception and aggression, a lesson as old as Scripture itself.
16 July 2026
5 MINS
We're told that progressive politics equals compassion, inclusion and kindness. But shocking reactions to Ann Widdecombe's murder — celebrating her death and hoping she died in extreme pain — reveal the socialist left's blatant 'hate speech' hypocrisy and disturbing double standards of the highest degree.
When you live in a socialist state, overruled by a socialist govt; there is no hope. For many the only answer is to shorten your life. It’s a tragic outcome predicted by pro-lifers and ignored by the previous premier of Victoria and encouraged by the present premier.
As someone living with limited time I feel nervous that I am going to have to fight for the right to die naturally, without guilt or coercion to hasten my last day.
Here in communist Canada, where sadly “medical assistance in dying” or “MAID” was launched with similarly unrealistic projections as is stated by your government, here is the reality after five years:
2016: 1,015 deaths
2017: 2,833 deaths
2018: 4,467 deaths
2019: 5,631 deaths
2020: 7,611 deaths
2021: 10,092 deaths
2022: 13,241 deaths
2023: 15,343 deaths
We have no official report for 2024 as yet. I dread to know. They coerce people who suffer, call and pressure them, before offering other supports, and now propose it as a solution for poverty (from homelessness they perpetuate), for depression, etc even among youth , without requiring parental knowledge or consent. And infants. It is always a slippery slope.
It is sad when the measure of success of a program is “How many people we killed”.