A new federal Bill seeks to guarantee babies born alive after an abortion the same right to medical care as any other newborn — reviving a debate first raised by Baby Samuel’s story in Queensland earlier this year.
Earlier this year, Australians were confronted with the story of Baby Samuel: a 16-week-old baby boy who was reportedly born alive following an abortion at Townsville Hospital and lived for approximately 30 minutes before dying.[i]
Samuel’s story received national and international attention after an image of him was released by Dr Joanna Howe. In Queensland, it became a catalyst for renewed discussion about what happens when a baby is born alive following an abortion and what obligations are owed to that child. His story also helped encourage thousands of Queenslanders to attend the Public Gathering for Queensland Babies in February.[ii]
Now, a new Bill is set to reach Federal Parliament. On Monday, Federal Member for Wide Bay Llew O’Brien MP introduced the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2026 into the House of Representatives.[iii]
At the heart of this campaign is a question, one in which many Australians may assume already has a straightforward answer: if a baby is born alive, should that child be entitled to the same legal right to medical care as any other newborn? Of course, the answer is yes.
What Would the Bill do?
The 2026 Bill has not yet been formally introduced, meaning its final text is not presently available through the Federal Parliament’s Bills database. However, O’Brien’s Bill, like previous BBA Bills, will seek to ensure that babies born alive after an abortion procedure will receive a legislative right to receive healthcare, just like any newborn baby.[iv]
The Bill follows the model of the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2022, which declared that a child born alive following an abortion is a person for the purposes of Australian law.[v] It also placed duties on health practitioners to provide medical care or treatment and established requirements relating to the collection of statistics about babies born alive following abortions.[vi]
If the 2026 Bill follows this model, its focus is not on whether an abortion can legally occur. It deals with what happens after a child has been born alive. Australians hold a wide range of views about abortion. But the question presented by this legislation is narrower: once an abortion has resulted in a live birth, should the circumstances surrounding that birth affect the medical care and legal recognition afforded to the newborn?
History of Babies Born Alive Bills in Australia
The concept of federal legislation protecting babies born alive following abortion has been before Parliament for several years.
In August 2021, then Federal Member George Christensen (Dawson) introduced the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2021 into the House of Representatives. The Bill sought to create duties for health practitioners to provide medical care or treatment to babies born alive following abortions and require reporting of those births. It ultimately lapsed when Parliament was dissolved in April 2022.[vii]
The proposal returned on 30 November 2022, when Senators Matt Canavan, Alex Antic and Ralph Babet introduced the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2022 into the Senate.[viii]⁴ In February 2023, the Bill was referred to the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee for inquiry.[ix] However, it was never enacted and ultimately lapsed at the end of the 47th Parliament on 21 July 2025.[x]
The issue has also been considered at a state level. In March 2024, Member for Traeger Robbie Katter MP introduced the Termination of Pregnancy (Live Births) Amendment Bill 2024 into the Queensland Parliament.[xi] The Bill was referred to the Health, Environment and Agriculture Committee for examination, which reported on the proposal in September 2024. The Committee tabled its report recommending that the Bill not be passed.
Now, five years after the first federal proposal, Llew O’Brien is bringing the issue back before the House of Representatives.
Why is the Bill Returning Now?
The renewed push comes amid increasing public attention on cases of babies reportedly born alive following abortions in Australia.
In Queensland, Baby Samuel’s story has given the debate a human face. His case prompted widespread discussion about late-term abortion, the treatment of babies born alive and the adequacy of existing protections.
Whatever one’s position on abortion itself, Samuel’s story raises an important question: what duties arise when a baby is born alive following an abortion? That is the question Mr O’Brien’s Bill will now ask Federal Parliament to consider.
The distinction at the heart of the debate is important. This Bill is not asking Parliament to determine the legality of the abortion that preceded the birth. Once a baby has been born alive, there is a living child outside his or her mother’s body. The question for Parliament is what happens next.
If every child born alive is equal before the law, the circumstances of that child’s birth should not determine whether he or she is entitled to medical care, protection and human dignity.
What happens next?
As a private member’s bill, introduction into the House of Representatives is only the beginning. The Bill will now go through a series of stages, we will update our supporters on the progress and when action is immediately needed.
___
[i] Cherish Life. “Baby Samuel: Queensland’s Pro-Life Awakening.” Cherish Life Website. Accessed 16 August 2026.
[ii] Cherish Life. “Baby Samuel: Queensland’s Pro-Life Awakening.” Cherish Life Website. Accessed 16 August 2026.
[iii] Australian Christian Lobby. “Human Rights for Babies Born Alive After Abortion, 2026.” ACL Website. Accessed 16 August, 2026.
[iv] Australian Christian Lobby. “Human Rights for Babies Born Alive After Abortion, 2026.” ACL Website. Accessed 16 August, 2026.
[v] Parliament of Australia. “Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2022.” Accessed 12 August, 2026.
[vi] Parliament of Australia. “Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2022.” Accessed 12 August, 2026.
[vii] Parliament of Australia. “Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2021.” Accessed 12 August, 2026.
[viii] Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee. “Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2022.” Parliament of Australia. Accessed 12 August, 2026.
[ix] Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee. “Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2022.” Parliament of Australia. Accessed 12 August, 2026.
[x] Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee. “Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2022.” Parliament of Australia. Accessed 12 August, 2026.
[xi] Queensland Parliament. “Termination of Pregnancy (Live Births) Amendment Bill 2024”. Accessed 17 August 2026.
___
Republished with thanks to Cherish Life.
O’Brien’s Federal Born Alive Bill Introduced to Parliament
20 August 2026
4 MINS
A new federal Bill seeks to guarantee babies born alive after an abortion the same right to medical care as any other newborn — reviving a debate first raised by Baby Samuel’s story in Queensland earlier this year.
Earlier this year, Australians were confronted with the story of Baby Samuel: a 16-week-old baby boy who was reportedly born alive following an abortion at Townsville Hospital and lived for approximately 30 minutes before dying.[i]
Samuel’s story received national and international attention after an image of him was released by Dr Joanna Howe. In Queensland, it became a catalyst for renewed discussion about what happens when a baby is born alive following an abortion and what obligations are owed to that child. His story also helped encourage thousands of Queenslanders to attend the Public Gathering for Queensland Babies in February.[ii]
Now, a new Bill is set to reach Federal Parliament. On Monday, Federal Member for Wide Bay Llew O’Brien MP introduced the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2026 into the House of Representatives.[iii]
At the heart of this campaign is a question, one in which many Australians may assume already has a straightforward answer: if a baby is born alive, should that child be entitled to the same legal right to medical care as any other newborn? Of course, the answer is yes.
What Would the Bill do?
The 2026 Bill has not yet been formally introduced, meaning its final text is not presently available through the Federal Parliament’s Bills database. However, O’Brien’s Bill, like previous BBA Bills, will seek to ensure that babies born alive after an abortion procedure will receive a legislative right to receive healthcare, just like any newborn baby.[iv]
The Bill follows the model of the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2022, which declared that a child born alive following an abortion is a person for the purposes of Australian law.[v] It also placed duties on health practitioners to provide medical care or treatment and established requirements relating to the collection of statistics about babies born alive following abortions.[vi]
If the 2026 Bill follows this model, its focus is not on whether an abortion can legally occur. It deals with what happens after a child has been born alive. Australians hold a wide range of views about abortion. But the question presented by this legislation is narrower: once an abortion has resulted in a live birth, should the circumstances surrounding that birth affect the medical care and legal recognition afforded to the newborn?
History of Babies Born Alive Bills in Australia
The concept of federal legislation protecting babies born alive following abortion has been before Parliament for several years.
In August 2021, then Federal Member George Christensen (Dawson) introduced the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2021 into the House of Representatives. The Bill sought to create duties for health practitioners to provide medical care or treatment to babies born alive following abortions and require reporting of those births. It ultimately lapsed when Parliament was dissolved in April 2022.[vii]
The proposal returned on 30 November 2022, when Senators Matt Canavan, Alex Antic and Ralph Babet introduced the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2022 into the Senate.[viii]⁴ In February 2023, the Bill was referred to the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee for inquiry.[ix] However, it was never enacted and ultimately lapsed at the end of the 47th Parliament on 21 July 2025.[x]
The issue has also been considered at a state level. In March 2024, Member for Traeger Robbie Katter MP introduced the Termination of Pregnancy (Live Births) Amendment Bill 2024 into the Queensland Parliament.[xi] The Bill was referred to the Health, Environment and Agriculture Committee for examination, which reported on the proposal in September 2024. The Committee tabled its report recommending that the Bill not be passed.
Now, five years after the first federal proposal, Llew O’Brien is bringing the issue back before the House of Representatives.
Why is the Bill Returning Now?
The renewed push comes amid increasing public attention on cases of babies reportedly born alive following abortions in Australia.
In Queensland, Baby Samuel’s story has given the debate a human face. His case prompted widespread discussion about late-term abortion, the treatment of babies born alive and the adequacy of existing protections.
Whatever one’s position on abortion itself, Samuel’s story raises an important question: what duties arise when a baby is born alive following an abortion? That is the question Mr O’Brien’s Bill will now ask Federal Parliament to consider.
The distinction at the heart of the debate is important. This Bill is not asking Parliament to determine the legality of the abortion that preceded the birth. Once a baby has been born alive, there is a living child outside his or her mother’s body. The question for Parliament is what happens next.
If every child born alive is equal before the law, the circumstances of that child’s birth should not determine whether he or she is entitled to medical care, protection and human dignity.
What happens next?
As a private member’s bill, introduction into the House of Representatives is only the beginning. The Bill will now go through a series of stages, we will update our supporters on the progress and when action is immediately needed.
___
[i] Cherish Life. “Baby Samuel: Queensland’s Pro-Life Awakening.” Cherish Life Website. Accessed 16 August 2026.
[ii] Cherish Life. “Baby Samuel: Queensland’s Pro-Life Awakening.” Cherish Life Website. Accessed 16 August 2026.
[iii] Australian Christian Lobby. “Human Rights for Babies Born Alive After Abortion, 2026.” ACL Website. Accessed 16 August, 2026.
[iv] Australian Christian Lobby. “Human Rights for Babies Born Alive After Abortion, 2026.” ACL Website. Accessed 16 August, 2026.
[v] Parliament of Australia. “Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2022.” Accessed 12 August, 2026.
[vi] Parliament of Australia. “Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2022.” Accessed 12 August, 2026.
[vii] Parliament of Australia. “Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2021.” Accessed 12 August, 2026.
[viii] Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee. “Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2022.” Parliament of Australia. Accessed 12 August, 2026.
[ix] Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee. “Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2022.” Parliament of Australia. Accessed 12 August, 2026.
[x] Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee. “Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2022.” Parliament of Australia. Accessed 12 August, 2026.
[xi] Queensland Parliament. “Termination of Pregnancy (Live Births) Amendment Bill 2024”. Accessed 17 August 2026.
___
Republished with thanks to Cherish Life.
About the Author: Matthew Cliff
Australia / Children / COMMENTARY / Fairness & Justice / Life / Politics
SHARE >
We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.
Fake news and censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate now.
Recent Articles:
The Great Lies: Labor’s War on the Australian Dream
20 August 2026
4 MINS
Young Australians face a housing crisis decades in the making. This piece argues political choices—not fate—locked a generation out of the Australian Dream, and calls for national renewal.
ABC Unapologetically Platforms Christian Men’s Ministry, Gym Church
20 August 2026
3.1 MINS
The ABC surprises with a balanced report on Gym Church, a Melbourne-born Christian fitness ministry now spreading nationally — exploring why Gen Z men are turning to faith.
Male Basketball Player Makes a Mockery of Trans Policy
20 August 2026
3.2 MINS
I've spent years fighting Australia's transgender policies in sport — facing court orders and police visits for it. Now Enes Kanter's WNBA declaration shows the tide may finally be turning.
A Bleak Way to Make the Case for Human Dignity
20 August 2026
1.4 MINS
Chelsea Clinton told a group of activists on Saturday that legalised abortion had been a good thing — not just because it gave women “the dignity to make our own choices”, but because it had added $3.5 trillion to the economy!
Standing for Life: Support for Born Alive Bill Grows Significantly in Parliament
19 August 2026
4 MINS
On 17 August, Parliament House witnessed historic momentum for the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2026. Record numbers of politicians attended and spoke publicly in support, while media coverage reached unprecedented levels — marking a significant shift in political engagement on this highly important issue.
Italian Migrant Says Anti-Hanson Rallygoers ‘Hypocrites’
19 August 2026
4.9 MINS
Attendees at a heated anti-Hanson rally in Melbourne clashed with security and reporters, sparking claims of hypocrisy from free-speech supporters and renewed debate over immigration, youth crime and Victoria's mounting state debt.
Islam, the Adhan, and Submission: Broadcasting the Muslim Call to Prayer
19 August 2026
5.4 MINS
Mosques push for public loudspeaker calls to prayer across Western cities, but the adhan carries deeper historical and religious meaning than commonly assumed.
Use your voice today to protect
Faith · Family · Freedom · Life
MOST POPULAR
ABOUT
The Daily Declaration is an Australian Christian news site dedicated to providing a voice for Christian values in the public square. Our vision is to see the revitalisation of our Judeo-Christian values for the common good. We are non-profit, independent, crowdfunded, and provide Christian news for a growing audience across Australia, Asia, and the South Pacific. The opinions of our contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of The Daily Declaration. Read More.
MOST COMMENTS
GOOD NEWS
HALL OF FAME
BROWSE TOPICS
BROWSE GENRES