Pandemic Agreement Passes: Will Climate Be the Next Global ‘Emergency’?
Australia has thrown its support behind the WHO’s Pandemic Agreement, raising concerns that future health and even climate emergencies could be used to override national decision-making and democratic accountability.
On May 20th, the 78th World Health Assembly voted to adopt the ‘Pandemic Agreement.’ This comes after three years of negotiation between the various World Health Organization member states that make up the Assembly.
Sadly, as expected, the Australian Government voted in support of the Agreement.
While the Pandemic Agreement might contain overtures about protecting member states’ sovereignty, the practical reality is that the Pandemic Agreement and the WHO’s advice and recommendations will invariably shape the decisions sovereign nations make during the next “global health emergency”.
This is particularly concerning given that the preamble to the Pandemic Agreement purports to recognise “the importance and public health impact of growing threats such as climate change”.
Will sovereign nations simply follow WHO recommendations if a “climate emergency” is declared?
The Pandemic Agreement will allow for the transfer of decision-making responsibility away from local decision makers, and into the hands of unaccountable globalist bureaucrats, because captured member states will be readily able to take drastic “health” measures, while purporting to rely on the Pandemic Agreement and the WHO’s advice as the justification for their decision.
Rejecting the Pandemic Agreement is Not Enough
How many times during COVID did you hear health officials and politicians tell you they were following “the science”, or acting on “health advice”? I asked to see the health advice underpinning decisions being made in South Australia about how people must live their lives during the pandemic – none was provided!
Over the past three years I have been calling for Australia to oppose this Pandemic Agreement. I have also gone further, suggesting Australia follow the path taken by the United States in withdrawing from the WHO altogether.
The COVID period made it abundantly clear how hazardous it is for democracies to defer their decision-making responsibilities to unelected bureaucrats, especially at the international level.
Decisions about a country’s emergency response are best left to the people of that country, without pressure from globalist bodies.
If Australia is to remain the author of its own future, we must withdraw from the WHO.
___
Image courtesy of Unsplash.
7 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
4 August 2026
5.2 MINS
How do you feel about listening to music that's been made totally through machine learning? Does it matter if you can't tell if it was made by a human or AI? Could the lyrics and emotion still resonate with you? Now, what about AI music made to worship God, or spread the Christian message — does it actually matter?
4 August 2026
9.1 MINS
Thirty Muslims living in the West have made their intentions crystal clear. They've announced their plans to dominate your country, replace your values, and transform your way of life — all on camera, in their own words. They're not hiding their Islamic agenda. The question is: When will we start believing them?
4 August 2026
6.6 MINS
Newly released emails and diary entries reignite debate over Anthony Fauci's pandemic leadership, exposing stark contrasts between his public statements and private assessments.
4 August 2026
6.6 MINS
Is the Murray-Darling Basin really drying out? Drawing on Bureau of Meteorology data, this article challenges official climate claims and questions the scientific basis for ongoing water buybacks.
3 August 2026
4.5 MINS
A former witch looking for spiritual answers in all the wrong places, Christopher Wickland has driven off a cliff, been dead for 15 minutes, and encountered Jesus in the woods. The former occultist turned Pentecostal pastor now carries a burning conviction that England needs to reclaim its Christian identity — an he's not afraid to say so.
3 August 2026
7.9 MINS
Ceuta, Spain's enclave on Morocco's coast, faces unprecedented chaos as tens of thousands breach borders in what leaders are calling an invasion. The crisis exposes the catastrophic consequences of open-border policies across Europe.
3 August 2026
5.7 MINS
To understand Neo-Marxism, we first need to understand the realities of Marxism. Not the politically cleaned up propaganda version, but the brutal realities of the lives, and deaths, of those who lived and died under it.
Yes Please a withdrawal from the WHO would be absolutely fantastic!
Most definitely.
And of course the WHO will never recommend Ivermectin, which had incredible results in countries such as Uttah Pradesh state in India. But was banned in Australia. Big pharma don’t like it, there’s no profit in it. As with many of these issues – follow the money. Also check out the WHO leader’s (Tedros) background, interesting to see where he is coming from
Tick to all of the above.
do you know about Tim Dwyer zoom 9:00? south Australia time Wednesday night. look at
timsTruth on Rumble
to join the zoom
tim@ourtrueaustralia.com
Yes! I agree! Australia is a sovereign nation and as such, we have the sovereign right to make our own decisions! I see this move as another “nail in the coffin “to our autonomy!
Absolutely Alex. We must retain our sovereignty, and not let unelected beaurocrats make our decisions. It could lead to “worldism”, as opposed to “nationalism”. God bless, Ken.