
Senator Antic to Introduce Bill Restoring Sex-Based Rights to the Sex Discrimination Act
Senator Alex Antic has risen in Parliament to flag his intent to introduce a private senator’s bill to restore sex-based rights to the Sex Discrimination Act and remove gender identity as a protected characteristic.
Senator Antic reminded the Senate that the Gillard government removed sex based protections in 2013, which has resulted in the “safety, privacy and opportunities of women” being significantly compromised.
In a post on X, Antic wrote:
In 2013, the Gillard Labor government amended the Sex Discrimination Act to remove the definitions of “man” and “woman” and inserted “gender identity” as a protected category. I am soon introducing a Private Senator’s Bill to undo these changes and restore the intended purpose of the Act.
‘Sex Is Not a Social Construct’: Senator Antic
The Senator for South Australia affirmed that “sex is not a social construct. It is a core biological reality that underpins human nature and the protections the Act was meant to provide.”
He referred to possibly unintended consequences that Julia Gillard made to the Act, and is seeking to restore common sense and reality to it. He also said the best way to care for those suffering from gender dysphoria is to speak the truth:
My bill would remove the references to gender identity and restore the Act’s clear definitions of man and woman as members of the male and female sex, respectively – ensuring that the Act once again protects women, upholds fairness, and respects the truth.
It is quite incredible that in 2025, this even needs to be said.
It is mind-boggling that laws have been changed to protect lies and deception at the expense of women’s dignity, safety and fairness. It is outrageous that politicians think they can defy reality and the laws of nature and get away with it.
Watch Senator Alex Antic’s speech below.
Video Transcript
Thank you. I rise to indicate that I intend to introduce a private senator’s bill to amend the Sex Discrimination Act by removing the references to gender identity and restoring the Act to its original purpose.
In 2013, the Gillard government introduced gender identity as a protected attribute of the Act. This changed the Act’s intent, creating a situation where the safety, privacy, and opportunities of women are now challenged pursuant to the very law that was designed to protect them.
Sex is not a social construct. It’s a core biological reality that underpins human nature and the protections the Act was meant to provide. The 2013 amendments made discrimination based on one’s appearance or mannerisms, with reference to gender identity, an offence.
It is this approach that has led to outcomes which one suspects were not actually properly considered at the time of the amendment in 2013.
If we really care about those who are suffering from gender dysphoria, we should be speaking this truth—not amplifying the issue. And the confusion, it must be said, needs to end.
My bill would remove the references to gender identity and restore the Act’s clear definitions of man and woman as members of the male and female sex, respectively—ensuring that the Act once again protects women, upholds fairness, and respects the truth.
___
Republished with thanks to Binary. Originally titled, “Senator Antic intends to remove gender identity protections from the Sex Discrimination Act”. Image via YouTube/Alex Antic.
3 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
6 August 2026
2.4 MINS
One Nation has built its appeal on personality rather than policy detail. A recent pitch from Pauline Hanson covered immigration, child care and Net Zero — but will she deliver on it?
6 August 2026
3.3 MINS
Facing closure, St Mary's church congregation has refused to surrender. The 900-year-old medieval building's dedicated parish has secured a crucial heritage grant to begin its long-overdue restoration.
6 August 2026
2.2 MINS
Transgender actress Elliot Page has sparked debate by citing chimpanzee behaviour to justify gender ideology. We’ve lost God, and now our spiritual collapse means we’re taking moral cues from monkeys. What could possibly go wrong?
6 August 2026
5.3 MINS
Boy George's new song "We Will Dance Again" challenges the anti-Israel narrative dominating cultural discourse. The British pop icon has risked his career to stand for Israel and Jewish people — but the backlash has been swift and severe.
6 August 2026
13.2 MINS
Fauci's dairies reveal a tale of national devastation and generational harm, tracing one soul's descent through ambition, ego, and corruption—from social climbing and fame through megalomania, deceit, and malice, culminating in defeat.
5 August 2026
6.9 MINS
Census night is less than a week away, and the religion question is more confusing than it should be. Here’s exactly how Christians — practising or not — should answer it, and why the ABS’s design deserves scrutiny.
5 August 2026
2.3 MINS
What happens when the side arguing 'the West shouldn't be suspicious of Islam' essentially tells their opponents: 'Be nice to us or the mob outside will get you'? An Oxford debate provides the answer.






Great that he’s doing that, but I don’t think enough of parliament have rejoined reality for it to pass.
Let’s pray for a miracle
Have courage Alex and speak the truth. You never know what might happen. Thanks