
Australia’s Most Dangerous Assumption: That You’re Still Free to Speak.
Freedom of speech isn’t protected in our Constitution — and it’s disappearing faster than you think.
-
I’ve introduced the Constitution Alteration (Right to Free Speech) 2025to enshrine freedom of speech and freedom of the press in Australia’s Constitution.
-
Australians assume they already have free speech; they don’t. That assumption is now dangerously wrong.
-
State and federal laws increasingly punish Australians for saying what they honestly believe, even simple biological truths.
-
Without freedom of speech, there is no freedom of thought. The right to speak your mind is the foundation of every other liberty.
-
My Bill will give Australians the chance to vote in a referendum and decide, once and for all, whether we still believe in the right to speak freely in our own country.
I have introduced the Constitution Alteration (Right to Free Speech) 2025, the purpose of which is to enshrine freedom of speech within the Australian Constitution.
The proposed alteration will insert a new Chapter IIIA and section 80A in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900. The new section will provide that the Commonwealth or a State must not make any law that limits the freedom of speech, including freedom of the press and other media.
This Bill is urgently needed and will provide protection of a right that Australians assume they already have. That assumption is increasingly dangerous.
While freedom of speech in this country is generally assumed, it is not guaranteed. Indeed, it is under perilous threat right now.
Chilling Effect
Over the past decade, the right of Australians to say what they think has increasingly come under attack.
While Australian Parliaments have made no effort to protect speech, they have passed laws – at state and federal levels – to restrict freedom of speech.
We are now at a point in this country where it is dangerous to openly say things that most people privately believe.
It’s a brave person, for example, who opines in public that men cannot become women.
Is that really the kind of country we want to live in? A country in which stating simple biological truths puts a person in danger of being dragged before a tribunal to be interrogated for their words.
Halt the Regression
It is time to provide a constitutional right for all Australians to say what they truly think.
The Western world became prosperous by allowing, rather than censuring debate.
Free speech is not a thing to be feared. It’s a thing which should be embraced.
Free speech is not something to protect people from; it’s something to be encouraged.
The Enlightenment was built on the ability of people to say what they honestly thought, even if it went against established norms.
Indeed, it was the ability to challenge norms that made progress possible.
But we now risk going backwards into a new Dark Age of restricted speech, where certain ideas – held sacrosanct by those in power – are beyond challenging. This bodes well for nobody.
Without speech there is no expression of thought, it is no exaggeration to say that if people are not able to speak freely then they are not able to think clearly.
And that is the key issue here. Freedom of thought supposes freedom of speech. The two are indelibly linked.
What good are all the other freedoms if people are not free to think independently of the state and to express those thoughts?
Protecting Democracy
Australia lacks, at a national level, entrenched protections of freedom of speech. Our role as elected representatives should be to provide and sustain that right.
This Bill, if successful, will give the Australian people the power to vote in a referendum and determine just how important freedom of speech is to them.
I believe the people will vote overwhelmingly in favour of free speech, because Australians may disagree on many issues, but we believe in a fair go and the right of everyone to voice their opinion without fear or favour.
Our proposed alteration to the Constitution will protect freedom of expression along similar lines to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, which provides that the Congress ‘shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press’.
The Australian Constitution already provides some express protection against legislative action by the Commonwealth. Section 116 says that the Parliament ‘shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion’.
In a similar way, our proposed protection for freedom of speech would reflect the assumption of all Australians that people have the right to express their thoughts with confidence and without fear of censure.
Moreover, it would put a brake on efforts to suppress freedom of speech that are, shockingly, becoming more and more common around the Western world, including here in Australia.
There shouldn’t be a single Senator in this chamber who would say they were against freedom of speech.
There shouldn’t be a single Senator in this chamber who would say to their constituents, I want to make it more difficult for you and your family to express your opinions.
We came to Canberra not to oppress our constituents but to defend and ensure their freedoms. This bill does that. And it is long overdue.
I commend this Bill to the Senate.
___
Republished with thanks to Senator Ralph Babet. Image courtesy of Adobe.
8 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
15 June 2026
2.8 MINS
Living under a $1 million CCP bounty, exiled Hong Konger Frances Hui has been named this year's recipient of the Victims of Communism Dissident Human Rights Award for her continued fight against the regime.
15 June 2026
5.1 MINS
Parents of Down syndrome children have spoken out, sharing the joy of raising their children, after internet influencer Jesse Ridgway posted explaining why he and his wife chose to abort their baby after a genetic test came back positive for Trisomy 21.
15 June 2026
3.4 MINS
Pro-life Health Professionals Australia (PHPA) has issued two statements critiquing claims made by two medical institutions opposing moves to see late-term abortion restricted in South Australia. PHPA will support a public pro-life rally outside Parliament House, Adelaide, on 17 June.
15 June 2026
7.5 MINS
Millions of words have been written about socialism. Worse yet, millions of lives have been sacrificed to the delusions of socialism and Marxism. Here are 50 great quotes on socialism.
12 June 2026
3 MINS
One Nation has raised a staggering $2.5 million towards its "fire the liar" ad campaign — to be used in targeting Labor-held seats. While the PM dismissed the numbers, an independent audit has verified the donation amount.
12 June 2026
4.2 MINS
Nation First explores why One Nation’s pro-life policies against Australia's most extreme abortion laws may be closer to mainstream Australian opinion than many media reports suggest.
12 June 2026
3.9 MINS
Socialism presents itself as compassionate, enlightened, and morally superior. It promises “equity,” “inclusion,” and “social justice” — but beneath the appealing slogans is a worldview that is hostile to God, his created order and his authority.






Well done, senator Babet ! Let’s have a Referendum on Free Speech to enshrine in our Constitution an amendment similar to the US’s. We are fast becoming like the former East Germany and the other European countries which were under Soviet Russia. Unfortunately many of our recent immigrants don’t understand the value of Free Speech, etc because they come from countries ruled by dictators. We need to educate them !
Spot on, Senator Babet! Excellent! Every Australian who I know will be totally with you on this.
May God encourage you.
Salute’, Senator Ralph Babet! Stand for Senator Babet!
God blesses you and your good work! Long live!
Samuel, Although it isn’t required for State parliamentarians to give up dual citizenship it is a requirement for federal parliamentarians to do so (unless that has changed in recent years). The procedure of giving up citizenship in another country is to renounce that citizenship.
Thank you Senator Babet for standing up for freedom of speech and protection of that right in Australia. May the bill be introduced so that there can be a referendum ib this matter before the AI surveillance increases and other methods of surveillance that can and will lead to censorship.
May we learn from Germany’s example in WW2, how a country can be changed overnight once the media is used as a weapon to ‘program’ people and to punish ciizens who don’t conform to a regime e.g. a regime that seeks to annhilate or control a certain race, religious group as well as their families and associates.
The digital control plan is already evident.
May God help Australians see what is in the pipeline, to pray, to speak up and to see the dangers.
Yes! during my years in China, I read some books written by the older Chinese when they were forced to speak only what the Communist government allowed.
What they knew to be right was in their heads, but they were forced to speak ‘Communist Government Speak’ or be severely punished – and they became confused and disoriented. Almost ‘off their heads’!
Thank you for speaking up for all Australians who value the right of freedom of speech.
Australians have lost their rights because our federal and state governments have betrayed Australians. The media is complicit
The principle of natural justice has also been severely damaged because politicians have created systems that control citizens and citizens do not have access to legal representation.
” …. the parliament shall not prevent the free exercise of any religion.” That is in the Oz constitution. So the Labor state and Federal governments keep passing unconstitutional, therefore illegal, legislation attacking what can be said by a religious leader in church, and the way religious schools are staffed and generally run.
…. Hello??? Is there something soporific in the drinking water of the majority of the population???