Australia’s Largest Christian News Site

Advocates de-platforming an Aboriginal Elder’s voice, while simultaneously platforming an Aboriginal Voice to Parliament, says it all.

There was no draft legislation to lay out what a Voice would look like, what it could and couldn't do, and whether its members would be elected or selected. Rightly, Australians' good sense raised multiple worries as the Yes campaign proceeded.

On Tuesday, fully 100 per cent of Government senators (Labor and Greens) refused to support an inquiry into the sexual abuse of Indigenous children.

The Yes campaign and the corporate media might be in mourning, but in truth, the referendum result is a win for all Australians. Here's why.

It beggars belief that the overwhelming public rejection of the proposal to create a Voice within the Federal Constitution has not resulted in the SA Parliament removing this structure from the State Constitution.

The referendum was a grassroots victory. Despite the division, there are positives to come out of it and hope for the future of Australia, including a renewed opportunity for good policies and the gospel.

On referendum day, a confrontation between an older white Yes campaigner and an Aboriginal No voter turned ugly.

Australia emphatically rejected enshrining an Indigenous Voice to Parliament advisory body in the constitution at the weekend’s referendum, with a 60/40 split for No vs. Yes.

The Australian Capital Territory was the only jurisdiction in the country where a majority of Australians voted for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

The media has talked for months about enshrining the Voice to Parliament and Executive Government into the constitution. A shrine is something you worship at. What are we meant to worship?

Despite its relatively short length, Voice Treaty Truth contains a wealth of information and background. It is a soul-searching read that will prove vital for the days, weeks and months ahead.

Recent financial scandals have exposed multiple Black Lives Matter activists as frauds. Truth be told, their grift was obvious from the start.

In the end, this referendum is a referendum about Australia. What sort of a country do you think we are? The authors of the Voice are putting to us that we are essentially a racist country...

If successful, the Voice will introduce a race-based or ancestry/heritage-based body into the constitution, which is therefore discriminatory and goes against the equality of law in a democracy.

A series of disturbing events have played out in Sydney over the last two days, as pro-Hamas crowds vent anger and hatred at Israel.

I appreciate your passion, Rev. Costello, in prosecuting your case for the ‘Yes’ campaign. But all things considered, I believe my duty as a Christian is to vote ‘No’.

Years of work for reconciliation and to build a multicultural cohesive society in Australia are at risk with the Voice referendum. I explain cultural Marxism and why I am voting no at the referendum.

The ‘Yes’ campaign continues to believe they can persuade people to support an Indigenous Voice to Parliament by abusing them.

Former Prime Minister Julia Gillard launched the ‘Yes’ campaign in London overnight as 160,000 expats began voting in the referendum.

The Uluru Statement envisages that with “substantive constitutional change and structural reform”, “two sovereignties [can] co-exist”.