The Voice referendum

Setting Voice Referendum Up to Fail

9 March 2023

1.9 MINS

The approach taken by Labor and the Coalition towards the referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament is a case study in how the politics of blame works in Australia.

Both major parties have adopted separate political strategies leading into the referendum, diminishing the chances of consensus and increasing the likelihood of failure. Anthony Albanese’s strategy is to try and shame the Coalition into supporting the Voice without providing the finer details, which risks splitting the Yes vote.

In contrast, Peter Dutton’s approach is to demand a definitive model beforehand, so Australians know exactly what they will be voting for. This sets up a political impasse that cannot be resolved without one side shifting ground. But it also means both parties will have a reason to heap responsibility on to the other if the vote is lost, an outcome that will mire the nation in a period of ugly political recrimination.


If the referendum fails, Dutton can blame the result on a lack of detail, while Albanese will blame the opposition for bogging down the debate. With only 8 out of 44 referendums having succeeded, the politics surrounding the Voice are being informed more by how blame can be apportioned for a defeat, rather than what compromises can be struck to achieve success.

So far, the Liberal Party hasn’t reached a formal position on whether it will support the proposal, and Labor doesn’t know how the Voice will operate. This is not a recipe for success.

The 15 practical questions put to Albanese by Dutton will need to be answered at some point. These are fundamental issues the parliament will need to deal with in the event of a successful vote.

Who can serve on the Voice, will members be elected or appointed, how many will make up the body, what are the functions and powers of the Voice? Will there be a definition of Aboriginality to determine who can serve on the body?

Dutton is right to say these questions are not unreasonable. His appeal for Albanese to provide the “basic detail” will resonate with those who are supportive of a Voice, but uncomfortable at supporting a new body without knowing how it will operate.


Will Albanese answer Dutton’s 15 questions? Will he sit down with the Opposition Leader to work out what model the Liberals could support, where there is scope for agreement and where Labor could make concessions? Don’t count on it. The politics of the Voice referendum is not being conducted in this manner.

Labor believes the details can be worked out later. This is a high-risk strategy. If the Voice is defeated, Albanese may have a much harder time than he thinks in managing the politics of blame or sheeting home responsibility to Dutton. After all, he is the Prime Minister who championed the Voice and raised expectations, all while ignoring demands to explain how the new body was supposed to work.


Originally published at the Australian Prayer Network. Image: Peripitus/Wikimedia Commons

We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.

Fake news and censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate now.


  1. Kaylene Emery 9 March 2023 at 8:33 am - Reply

    Your ability to analyse and strategise is impressive Brian. I am glad you are working with and for Our Lord Jesus Christ, and not the government or…..the banks.
    Thank you for your work and for being salt and light.

  2. Emmy 9 March 2023 at 4:56 pm - Reply

    Well let’s hope it does fail, that’s all I can say!

Leave A Comment

Recent Articles:

Use your voice today to protect

Faith · Family · Freedom · Life



The Daily Declaration is an Australian Christian news site dedicated to providing a voice for Christian values in the public square. Our vision is to see the revitalisation of our Judeo-Christian values for the common good. We are non-profit, independent, crowdfunded, and provide Christian news for a growing audience across Australia, Asia, and the South Pacific. The opinions of our contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of The Daily Declaration. Read More.